Cargando…

OR30-07 Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) Results from Revita-2, the First Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Double-Blind, Prospective, Multicenter Study of Duodenal Mucosal Resurfacing (DMR) Safety and Efficacy in Patients with Sub-Optimally Controlled Type 2 Diabetes (T2D)

BACKGROUND: The duodenum is a key metabolic signaling center and regulator of metabolic homeostasis. Duodenal mucosal hyperplasia is therefore a potential therapeutic target for metabolic diseases related to insulin-resistance. Previous reports demonstrated that DMR, a minimally invasive, endoscopic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hopkins, David, Mingrone, Geltrude, Aithal, Guruprasad P, Bhambhani, Vijeta, Costamagna, Guido, Crenier, Laurent, Deviere, Jacques, Drummond, Russell Sinclair, Haidry, Rehan, Idris, Iskandar, Lania, Andrea, Lopez-Talavera, Juan Carlos, Magee, Cormac, Nieuwdorp, Max, Rajagopalan, Harith, White, Kelly, Bergman, Jacques J G H M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7209409/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvaa046.491
_version_ 1783531070938939392
author Hopkins, David
Mingrone, Geltrude
Aithal, Guruprasad P
Bhambhani, Vijeta
Costamagna, Guido
Crenier, Laurent
Deviere, Jacques
Drummond, Russell Sinclair
Haidry, Rehan
Idris, Iskandar
Lania, Andrea
Lopez-Talavera, Juan Carlos
Magee, Cormac
Nieuwdorp, Max
Rajagopalan, Harith
White, Kelly
Bergman, Jacques J G H M
author_facet Hopkins, David
Mingrone, Geltrude
Aithal, Guruprasad P
Bhambhani, Vijeta
Costamagna, Guido
Crenier, Laurent
Deviere, Jacques
Drummond, Russell Sinclair
Haidry, Rehan
Idris, Iskandar
Lania, Andrea
Lopez-Talavera, Juan Carlos
Magee, Cormac
Nieuwdorp, Max
Rajagopalan, Harith
White, Kelly
Bergman, Jacques J G H M
author_sort Hopkins, David
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The duodenum is a key metabolic signaling center and regulator of metabolic homeostasis. Duodenal mucosal hyperplasia is therefore a potential therapeutic target for metabolic diseases related to insulin-resistance. Previous reports demonstrated that DMR, a minimally invasive, endoscopic mucosal ablative procedure, safely improves hepatic and glycemic parameters. Primary endpoints from REVITA-2, the first randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind, prospective, multicenter study of DMR safety and efficacy in patients with T2D, were met and previously reported. Here we further explore mechanisms underlying the beneficial effects of DMR on hepatic and glucose metabolism by analyzing mixed meal tolerance test (MMTT) data from the REVITA-2 study. Methods: Eligible patients (HbA1c 7.5–10%, BMI ≥ 24 to ≤ 40 kg/m(2), on stable treatment with ≥1 oral anti-diabetic medication) received DMR or sham procedure (1:1). Exploratory endpoints included median change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG), MMTT glucose area under the curve (AUC) over 2 hours, and change in MMTT C-peptide and glucagon over 2 hours, from baseline to 12 weeks post-DMR. One-sided P value based on ANCOVA model on ranks without imputation assessed treatment difference at the 0.05 significance level. The modified intent to treat primary analysis population included randomized patients in whom study procedure was attempted. Results: A total of 70 patients (DMR, N = 35; sham, N = 35) were included in the analysis, of which 57% and 54% (DMR, n = 20; sham, n = 19) had baseline FPG ≥ 180 mg/dL. Median MMTT AUC for glucose was significantly reduced post-DMR (-36.38 mg/dL) compared with sham (-4.94 mg/dL; P = 0.009), driven by a significant decrease in FPG (DMR, -41.0 mg/dL; sham, -15.0 mg/dL; P = 0.003) rather than median MMTT postprandial glucose excursion (DMR, -4.63 mg/dL; sham, 5.34 mg/dL; P = 0.209). AUC glucose reductions were more pronounced in patients with baseline FPG ≥ 180 (DMR, -63.03 mg/dL; sham, -20.31 mg/dL; P = 0.007) compared with baseline FPG < 180 (DMR, -26.81 mg/dL; sham, 13.81 mg/dL; P = 0.271). In patients with baseline FPG ≥ 180, postprandial C-peptide excursion was significantly increased (DMR, 0.41 ng/mL; sham, 0.02 ng/mL; P = 0.012) and postprandial glucagon excursion was significantly decreased (DMR, -8.03 pg/mL; sham, 2.13 pg/mL; P = 0.027). Conclusion: DMR markedly improves glucose responses to a mixed meal challenge, primarily driven by a decrease in FPG, suggesting a primary effect on insulin resistance. Increases in C-peptide and reductions in glucagon levels suggest improvement in beta cell function in addition to improvements in hepatic insulin sensitivity, and ratifies the position of the duodenum as both a culprit endocrine organ and therapeutic target for patients with T2D.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7209409
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72094092020-05-13 OR30-07 Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) Results from Revita-2, the First Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Double-Blind, Prospective, Multicenter Study of Duodenal Mucosal Resurfacing (DMR) Safety and Efficacy in Patients with Sub-Optimally Controlled Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) Hopkins, David Mingrone, Geltrude Aithal, Guruprasad P Bhambhani, Vijeta Costamagna, Guido Crenier, Laurent Deviere, Jacques Drummond, Russell Sinclair Haidry, Rehan Idris, Iskandar Lania, Andrea Lopez-Talavera, Juan Carlos Magee, Cormac Nieuwdorp, Max Rajagopalan, Harith White, Kelly Bergman, Jacques J G H M J Endocr Soc Diabetes Mellitus and Glucose Metabolism BACKGROUND: The duodenum is a key metabolic signaling center and regulator of metabolic homeostasis. Duodenal mucosal hyperplasia is therefore a potential therapeutic target for metabolic diseases related to insulin-resistance. Previous reports demonstrated that DMR, a minimally invasive, endoscopic mucosal ablative procedure, safely improves hepatic and glycemic parameters. Primary endpoints from REVITA-2, the first randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind, prospective, multicenter study of DMR safety and efficacy in patients with T2D, were met and previously reported. Here we further explore mechanisms underlying the beneficial effects of DMR on hepatic and glucose metabolism by analyzing mixed meal tolerance test (MMTT) data from the REVITA-2 study. Methods: Eligible patients (HbA1c 7.5–10%, BMI ≥ 24 to ≤ 40 kg/m(2), on stable treatment with ≥1 oral anti-diabetic medication) received DMR or sham procedure (1:1). Exploratory endpoints included median change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG), MMTT glucose area under the curve (AUC) over 2 hours, and change in MMTT C-peptide and glucagon over 2 hours, from baseline to 12 weeks post-DMR. One-sided P value based on ANCOVA model on ranks without imputation assessed treatment difference at the 0.05 significance level. The modified intent to treat primary analysis population included randomized patients in whom study procedure was attempted. Results: A total of 70 patients (DMR, N = 35; sham, N = 35) were included in the analysis, of which 57% and 54% (DMR, n = 20; sham, n = 19) had baseline FPG ≥ 180 mg/dL. Median MMTT AUC for glucose was significantly reduced post-DMR (-36.38 mg/dL) compared with sham (-4.94 mg/dL; P = 0.009), driven by a significant decrease in FPG (DMR, -41.0 mg/dL; sham, -15.0 mg/dL; P = 0.003) rather than median MMTT postprandial glucose excursion (DMR, -4.63 mg/dL; sham, 5.34 mg/dL; P = 0.209). AUC glucose reductions were more pronounced in patients with baseline FPG ≥ 180 (DMR, -63.03 mg/dL; sham, -20.31 mg/dL; P = 0.007) compared with baseline FPG < 180 (DMR, -26.81 mg/dL; sham, 13.81 mg/dL; P = 0.271). In patients with baseline FPG ≥ 180, postprandial C-peptide excursion was significantly increased (DMR, 0.41 ng/mL; sham, 0.02 ng/mL; P = 0.012) and postprandial glucagon excursion was significantly decreased (DMR, -8.03 pg/mL; sham, 2.13 pg/mL; P = 0.027). Conclusion: DMR markedly improves glucose responses to a mixed meal challenge, primarily driven by a decrease in FPG, suggesting a primary effect on insulin resistance. Increases in C-peptide and reductions in glucagon levels suggest improvement in beta cell function in addition to improvements in hepatic insulin sensitivity, and ratifies the position of the duodenum as both a culprit endocrine organ and therapeutic target for patients with T2D. Oxford University Press 2020-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7209409/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvaa046.491 Text en © Endocrine Society 2020. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Diabetes Mellitus and Glucose Metabolism
Hopkins, David
Mingrone, Geltrude
Aithal, Guruprasad P
Bhambhani, Vijeta
Costamagna, Guido
Crenier, Laurent
Deviere, Jacques
Drummond, Russell Sinclair
Haidry, Rehan
Idris, Iskandar
Lania, Andrea
Lopez-Talavera, Juan Carlos
Magee, Cormac
Nieuwdorp, Max
Rajagopalan, Harith
White, Kelly
Bergman, Jacques J G H M
OR30-07 Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) Results from Revita-2, the First Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Double-Blind, Prospective, Multicenter Study of Duodenal Mucosal Resurfacing (DMR) Safety and Efficacy in Patients with Sub-Optimally Controlled Type 2 Diabetes (T2D)
title OR30-07 Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) Results from Revita-2, the First Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Double-Blind, Prospective, Multicenter Study of Duodenal Mucosal Resurfacing (DMR) Safety and Efficacy in Patients with Sub-Optimally Controlled Type 2 Diabetes (T2D)
title_full OR30-07 Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) Results from Revita-2, the First Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Double-Blind, Prospective, Multicenter Study of Duodenal Mucosal Resurfacing (DMR) Safety and Efficacy in Patients with Sub-Optimally Controlled Type 2 Diabetes (T2D)
title_fullStr OR30-07 Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) Results from Revita-2, the First Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Double-Blind, Prospective, Multicenter Study of Duodenal Mucosal Resurfacing (DMR) Safety and Efficacy in Patients with Sub-Optimally Controlled Type 2 Diabetes (T2D)
title_full_unstemmed OR30-07 Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) Results from Revita-2, the First Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Double-Blind, Prospective, Multicenter Study of Duodenal Mucosal Resurfacing (DMR) Safety and Efficacy in Patients with Sub-Optimally Controlled Type 2 Diabetes (T2D)
title_short OR30-07 Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) Results from Revita-2, the First Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Double-Blind, Prospective, Multicenter Study of Duodenal Mucosal Resurfacing (DMR) Safety and Efficacy in Patients with Sub-Optimally Controlled Type 2 Diabetes (T2D)
title_sort or30-07 mixed meal tolerance test (mmtt) results from revita-2, the first randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind, prospective, multicenter study of duodenal mucosal resurfacing (dmr) safety and efficacy in patients with sub-optimally controlled type 2 diabetes (t2d)
topic Diabetes Mellitus and Glucose Metabolism
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7209409/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvaa046.491
work_keys_str_mv AT hopkinsdavid or3007mixedmealtolerancetestmmttresultsfromrevita2thefirstrandomizedshamcontrolleddoubleblindprospectivemulticenterstudyofduodenalmucosalresurfacingdmrsafetyandefficacyinpatientswithsuboptimallycontrolledtype2diabetest2d
AT mingronegeltrude or3007mixedmealtolerancetestmmttresultsfromrevita2thefirstrandomizedshamcontrolleddoubleblindprospectivemulticenterstudyofduodenalmucosalresurfacingdmrsafetyandefficacyinpatientswithsuboptimallycontrolledtype2diabetest2d
AT aithalguruprasadp or3007mixedmealtolerancetestmmttresultsfromrevita2thefirstrandomizedshamcontrolleddoubleblindprospectivemulticenterstudyofduodenalmucosalresurfacingdmrsafetyandefficacyinpatientswithsuboptimallycontrolledtype2diabetest2d
AT bhambhanivijeta or3007mixedmealtolerancetestmmttresultsfromrevita2thefirstrandomizedshamcontrolleddoubleblindprospectivemulticenterstudyofduodenalmucosalresurfacingdmrsafetyandefficacyinpatientswithsuboptimallycontrolledtype2diabetest2d
AT costamagnaguido or3007mixedmealtolerancetestmmttresultsfromrevita2thefirstrandomizedshamcontrolleddoubleblindprospectivemulticenterstudyofduodenalmucosalresurfacingdmrsafetyandefficacyinpatientswithsuboptimallycontrolledtype2diabetest2d
AT crenierlaurent or3007mixedmealtolerancetestmmttresultsfromrevita2thefirstrandomizedshamcontrolleddoubleblindprospectivemulticenterstudyofduodenalmucosalresurfacingdmrsafetyandefficacyinpatientswithsuboptimallycontrolledtype2diabetest2d
AT devierejacques or3007mixedmealtolerancetestmmttresultsfromrevita2thefirstrandomizedshamcontrolleddoubleblindprospectivemulticenterstudyofduodenalmucosalresurfacingdmrsafetyandefficacyinpatientswithsuboptimallycontrolledtype2diabetest2d
AT drummondrussellsinclair or3007mixedmealtolerancetestmmttresultsfromrevita2thefirstrandomizedshamcontrolleddoubleblindprospectivemulticenterstudyofduodenalmucosalresurfacingdmrsafetyandefficacyinpatientswithsuboptimallycontrolledtype2diabetest2d
AT haidryrehan or3007mixedmealtolerancetestmmttresultsfromrevita2thefirstrandomizedshamcontrolleddoubleblindprospectivemulticenterstudyofduodenalmucosalresurfacingdmrsafetyandefficacyinpatientswithsuboptimallycontrolledtype2diabetest2d
AT idrisiskandar or3007mixedmealtolerancetestmmttresultsfromrevita2thefirstrandomizedshamcontrolleddoubleblindprospectivemulticenterstudyofduodenalmucosalresurfacingdmrsafetyandefficacyinpatientswithsuboptimallycontrolledtype2diabetest2d
AT laniaandrea or3007mixedmealtolerancetestmmttresultsfromrevita2thefirstrandomizedshamcontrolleddoubleblindprospectivemulticenterstudyofduodenalmucosalresurfacingdmrsafetyandefficacyinpatientswithsuboptimallycontrolledtype2diabetest2d
AT lopeztalaverajuancarlos or3007mixedmealtolerancetestmmttresultsfromrevita2thefirstrandomizedshamcontrolleddoubleblindprospectivemulticenterstudyofduodenalmucosalresurfacingdmrsafetyandefficacyinpatientswithsuboptimallycontrolledtype2diabetest2d
AT mageecormac or3007mixedmealtolerancetestmmttresultsfromrevita2thefirstrandomizedshamcontrolleddoubleblindprospectivemulticenterstudyofduodenalmucosalresurfacingdmrsafetyandefficacyinpatientswithsuboptimallycontrolledtype2diabetest2d
AT nieuwdorpmax or3007mixedmealtolerancetestmmttresultsfromrevita2thefirstrandomizedshamcontrolleddoubleblindprospectivemulticenterstudyofduodenalmucosalresurfacingdmrsafetyandefficacyinpatientswithsuboptimallycontrolledtype2diabetest2d
AT rajagopalanharith or3007mixedmealtolerancetestmmttresultsfromrevita2thefirstrandomizedshamcontrolleddoubleblindprospectivemulticenterstudyofduodenalmucosalresurfacingdmrsafetyandefficacyinpatientswithsuboptimallycontrolledtype2diabetest2d
AT whitekelly or3007mixedmealtolerancetestmmttresultsfromrevita2thefirstrandomizedshamcontrolleddoubleblindprospectivemulticenterstudyofduodenalmucosalresurfacingdmrsafetyandefficacyinpatientswithsuboptimallycontrolledtype2diabetest2d
AT bergmanjacquesjghm or3007mixedmealtolerancetestmmttresultsfromrevita2thefirstrandomizedshamcontrolleddoubleblindprospectivemulticenterstudyofduodenalmucosalresurfacingdmrsafetyandefficacyinpatientswithsuboptimallycontrolledtype2diabetest2d