Cargando…

MON-LB78 Thyroid Nodules > 4cm: High-Risk for Malignancy or Not?

Background: Thyroid nodules are very common in adults. One percent of men and 5% of women have nodules on exam, and 19-68% of adults have thyroid nodules on ultrasound. Majority (85-90%) of them are benign. Most concerning is the diagnosis of thyroid cancer. These nodules can be stratified into risk...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fishel, Heather, Rao, Ambika
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7209588/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvaa046.2017
_version_ 1783531113102180352
author Fishel, Heather
Rao, Ambika
author_facet Fishel, Heather
Rao, Ambika
author_sort Fishel, Heather
collection PubMed
description Background: Thyroid nodules are very common in adults. One percent of men and 5% of women have nodules on exam, and 19-68% of adults have thyroid nodules on ultrasound. Majority (85-90%) of them are benign. Most concerning is the diagnosis of thyroid cancer. These nodules can be stratified into risk groups based on ultrasonographical criteria. There are 5 internationally endorsed sonographic classification systems (ATA, ACR, European Thyroid Association and Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology). After classification, decision to perform FNA biopsy is made based on size of the nodules. Some of the other parameters that have been considered to increase risk of cancer are BMI, TSH level, radiation exposure to the neck before puberty and family history of thyroid cancer. Cytogenetic testing of the FNA specimen may also help determine the need for excision. Study Design: We retrospectively studied a group of veterans referred for endocrine consultation for thyroid nodules that had undergone FNA based on ACR and ATA ultrasonographical classification (total of 127 nodules). On reviewing these charts over the past 4 years, we noted that approximately 39% (49/127) of the nodules were <2cm, 35% (44/127) were 2-4cm and 26% (34/127) were >4cm in size. We examined patient demographics and characteristics of nodules >4cm, since it is frequently a dilemma whether to clinical monitor these nodules or refer them for surgical excision. Results: Seventeen percent of patients were females. Majority were between 60-65 years of age, had a BMI 30-35 and TSH of <2. Based on review of ultrasound images and ACR and ATA classification, 55% of the nodules (19/24) had a score of 4-6 points on the TIRAD’s scale and based on ATA classification, 52% (18/34) were in the high-risk category. The ultrasound-guided FNA results showed that 65% were benign-Bethesda II (22/34), 12% were Bethesda III (4/34) and IV, 3% Bethesda V (1/34) and 15% Bethesda I (5/34). Eighteen percent of the nodules were referred for surgical excision (6/34); 3% were malignant (1/34), and the rest were benign (27/34). Discussion: It is unclear if the risk of thyroid cancer in nodules >4cm is any different from that of smaller nodules and if there should be different criteria used in nodules >4cm for risk stratification. Other questions to address are how these nodules should be monitored for growth and what criteria should be used to determine need for surgical intervention, other than FNA results or compression symptoms. Recent studies looking at growth of thyroid nodules over time do not indicate clear predictors for malignancy. Further studies are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7209588
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72095882020-05-13 MON-LB78 Thyroid Nodules > 4cm: High-Risk for Malignancy or Not? Fishel, Heather Rao, Ambika J Endocr Soc Thyroid Background: Thyroid nodules are very common in adults. One percent of men and 5% of women have nodules on exam, and 19-68% of adults have thyroid nodules on ultrasound. Majority (85-90%) of them are benign. Most concerning is the diagnosis of thyroid cancer. These nodules can be stratified into risk groups based on ultrasonographical criteria. There are 5 internationally endorsed sonographic classification systems (ATA, ACR, European Thyroid Association and Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology). After classification, decision to perform FNA biopsy is made based on size of the nodules. Some of the other parameters that have been considered to increase risk of cancer are BMI, TSH level, radiation exposure to the neck before puberty and family history of thyroid cancer. Cytogenetic testing of the FNA specimen may also help determine the need for excision. Study Design: We retrospectively studied a group of veterans referred for endocrine consultation for thyroid nodules that had undergone FNA based on ACR and ATA ultrasonographical classification (total of 127 nodules). On reviewing these charts over the past 4 years, we noted that approximately 39% (49/127) of the nodules were <2cm, 35% (44/127) were 2-4cm and 26% (34/127) were >4cm in size. We examined patient demographics and characteristics of nodules >4cm, since it is frequently a dilemma whether to clinical monitor these nodules or refer them for surgical excision. Results: Seventeen percent of patients were females. Majority were between 60-65 years of age, had a BMI 30-35 and TSH of <2. Based on review of ultrasound images and ACR and ATA classification, 55% of the nodules (19/24) had a score of 4-6 points on the TIRAD’s scale and based on ATA classification, 52% (18/34) were in the high-risk category. The ultrasound-guided FNA results showed that 65% were benign-Bethesda II (22/34), 12% were Bethesda III (4/34) and IV, 3% Bethesda V (1/34) and 15% Bethesda I (5/34). Eighteen percent of the nodules were referred for surgical excision (6/34); 3% were malignant (1/34), and the rest were benign (27/34). Discussion: It is unclear if the risk of thyroid cancer in nodules >4cm is any different from that of smaller nodules and if there should be different criteria used in nodules >4cm for risk stratification. Other questions to address are how these nodules should be monitored for growth and what criteria should be used to determine need for surgical intervention, other than FNA results or compression symptoms. Recent studies looking at growth of thyroid nodules over time do not indicate clear predictors for malignancy. Further studies are needed. Oxford University Press 2020-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7209588/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvaa046.2017 Text en © Endocrine Society 2020. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Thyroid
Fishel, Heather
Rao, Ambika
MON-LB78 Thyroid Nodules > 4cm: High-Risk for Malignancy or Not?
title MON-LB78 Thyroid Nodules > 4cm: High-Risk for Malignancy or Not?
title_full MON-LB78 Thyroid Nodules > 4cm: High-Risk for Malignancy or Not?
title_fullStr MON-LB78 Thyroid Nodules > 4cm: High-Risk for Malignancy or Not?
title_full_unstemmed MON-LB78 Thyroid Nodules > 4cm: High-Risk for Malignancy or Not?
title_short MON-LB78 Thyroid Nodules > 4cm: High-Risk for Malignancy or Not?
title_sort mon-lb78 thyroid nodules > 4cm: high-risk for malignancy or not?
topic Thyroid
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7209588/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvaa046.2017
work_keys_str_mv AT fishelheather monlb78thyroidnodules4cmhighriskformalignancyornot
AT raoambika monlb78thyroidnodules4cmhighriskformalignancyornot