Cargando…

MON-LB57 Impact of Imputation Method and Response Cutoffs on Results From the Phase 3 OPTIMAL Study of Oral Octreotide Capsules in Adult Patients With Acromegaly

Objective: The phase 3 CHIASMA OPTIMAL study assessed efficacy and safety of oral octreotide capsules (OOC) in patients with acromegaly controlled on injectable somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs). Sensitivity analyses were conducted for efficacy endpoints using two methods of imputation (i.e., the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Samson, Susan Leanne, Nachtigall, Lisa B, Fleseriu, Maria, Gordon, Murray B, Jensterle, Mojca, Elenkova, Atanaska, Ludlam, William Henry, Patou, Gary, Haviv, Asi, Biermasz, Nienke, Trainer, Peter James, Strasburger, Christian Joseph, Kennedy, Laurence, Melmed, Shlomo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7209634/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvaa046.2120
_version_ 1783531124011565056
author Samson, Susan Leanne
Nachtigall, Lisa B
Fleseriu, Maria
Gordon, Murray B
Jensterle, Mojca
Elenkova, Atanaska
Ludlam, William Henry
Patou, Gary
Haviv, Asi
Biermasz, Nienke
Trainer, Peter James
Strasburger, Christian Joseph
Kennedy, Laurence
Melmed, Shlomo
author_facet Samson, Susan Leanne
Nachtigall, Lisa B
Fleseriu, Maria
Gordon, Murray B
Jensterle, Mojca
Elenkova, Atanaska
Ludlam, William Henry
Patou, Gary
Haviv, Asi
Biermasz, Nienke
Trainer, Peter James
Strasburger, Christian Joseph
Kennedy, Laurence
Melmed, Shlomo
author_sort Samson, Susan Leanne
collection PubMed
description Objective: The phase 3 CHIASMA OPTIMAL study assessed efficacy and safety of oral octreotide capsules (OOC) in patients with acromegaly controlled on injectable somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs). Sensitivity analyses were conducted for efficacy endpoints using two methods of imputation (i.e., the process of replacing clinical data with substitution values) to address missing data points due to some subjects reverting back to their prior injectable SRL treatment. Methods: Patients were ≥18 years of age and had evidence of active acromegaly with an average IGF-I ≤ 1.0 x ULN (utilizing the IDS iSYS assay calibrated to WHO recombinant reference standard 02/254). At baseline, patients were randomized to receive OOC or placebo for 36 weeks. The primary endpoint was proportion of patients maintaining biochemical response, defined as IGF-I ≤1.0 x ULN (2-value average at weeks 34 and 36) (Samson et al. ENDO 2020). Per study protocol, patient study discontinuations were considered non-responders regardless of clinical response at the time of discontinuation (non-response imputation). Additional exploratory analyses were performed utilizing the last observation carried forward (LOCF) analysis, as well as a completers analysis of response among the subgroup that completed the entire 36 weeks on study drug. The response rates reported for the primary end point are slightly adjusted for stratification differences as prespecified in the statistical analysis plan. Results: Twenty-eight patients received OOC and 12 failed to maintain biochemical response based on the primary endpoint. Seven of these 12 patients discontinued treatment early - 5 due to treatment failure and 2 due to AEs. The remaining 5 patients completed the 36-week protocol on study drug. Of these 5 patients, 4 had IGF-I values between >1.0 and ≤1.3 x ULN and 1 completed the study with an IGF-I of 1.7 x ULN with no clinical symptoms. 58.2% of patients in the OOC group met the primary endpoint of maintenance of biochemical response at the end of study using the non-response imputation. Using LOCF imputation, 64.3% (18/28) of patients met this endpoint. Of those completing the study (N=21), 76.2% maintained response. Conclusion: CHIASMA OPTIMAL primary endpoint was assessed using the non-response imputation for patients who discontinued treatment early, with a 58.2% response rate. However, when assessing the response rate based on LOCF imputation, or in study completers, similar to other phase 3 studies for acromegaly, the rate was imputed at 64.3% and 76.2%, respectively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7209634
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72096342020-05-13 MON-LB57 Impact of Imputation Method and Response Cutoffs on Results From the Phase 3 OPTIMAL Study of Oral Octreotide Capsules in Adult Patients With Acromegaly Samson, Susan Leanne Nachtigall, Lisa B Fleseriu, Maria Gordon, Murray B Jensterle, Mojca Elenkova, Atanaska Ludlam, William Henry Patou, Gary Haviv, Asi Biermasz, Nienke Trainer, Peter James Strasburger, Christian Joseph Kennedy, Laurence Melmed, Shlomo J Endocr Soc Neuroendocrinology and Pituitary Objective: The phase 3 CHIASMA OPTIMAL study assessed efficacy and safety of oral octreotide capsules (OOC) in patients with acromegaly controlled on injectable somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs). Sensitivity analyses were conducted for efficacy endpoints using two methods of imputation (i.e., the process of replacing clinical data with substitution values) to address missing data points due to some subjects reverting back to their prior injectable SRL treatment. Methods: Patients were ≥18 years of age and had evidence of active acromegaly with an average IGF-I ≤ 1.0 x ULN (utilizing the IDS iSYS assay calibrated to WHO recombinant reference standard 02/254). At baseline, patients were randomized to receive OOC or placebo for 36 weeks. The primary endpoint was proportion of patients maintaining biochemical response, defined as IGF-I ≤1.0 x ULN (2-value average at weeks 34 and 36) (Samson et al. ENDO 2020). Per study protocol, patient study discontinuations were considered non-responders regardless of clinical response at the time of discontinuation (non-response imputation). Additional exploratory analyses were performed utilizing the last observation carried forward (LOCF) analysis, as well as a completers analysis of response among the subgroup that completed the entire 36 weeks on study drug. The response rates reported for the primary end point are slightly adjusted for stratification differences as prespecified in the statistical analysis plan. Results: Twenty-eight patients received OOC and 12 failed to maintain biochemical response based on the primary endpoint. Seven of these 12 patients discontinued treatment early - 5 due to treatment failure and 2 due to AEs. The remaining 5 patients completed the 36-week protocol on study drug. Of these 5 patients, 4 had IGF-I values between >1.0 and ≤1.3 x ULN and 1 completed the study with an IGF-I of 1.7 x ULN with no clinical symptoms. 58.2% of patients in the OOC group met the primary endpoint of maintenance of biochemical response at the end of study using the non-response imputation. Using LOCF imputation, 64.3% (18/28) of patients met this endpoint. Of those completing the study (N=21), 76.2% maintained response. Conclusion: CHIASMA OPTIMAL primary endpoint was assessed using the non-response imputation for patients who discontinued treatment early, with a 58.2% response rate. However, when assessing the response rate based on LOCF imputation, or in study completers, similar to other phase 3 studies for acromegaly, the rate was imputed at 64.3% and 76.2%, respectively. Oxford University Press 2020-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7209634/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvaa046.2120 Text en © Endocrine Society 2020. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Neuroendocrinology and Pituitary
Samson, Susan Leanne
Nachtigall, Lisa B
Fleseriu, Maria
Gordon, Murray B
Jensterle, Mojca
Elenkova, Atanaska
Ludlam, William Henry
Patou, Gary
Haviv, Asi
Biermasz, Nienke
Trainer, Peter James
Strasburger, Christian Joseph
Kennedy, Laurence
Melmed, Shlomo
MON-LB57 Impact of Imputation Method and Response Cutoffs on Results From the Phase 3 OPTIMAL Study of Oral Octreotide Capsules in Adult Patients With Acromegaly
title MON-LB57 Impact of Imputation Method and Response Cutoffs on Results From the Phase 3 OPTIMAL Study of Oral Octreotide Capsules in Adult Patients With Acromegaly
title_full MON-LB57 Impact of Imputation Method and Response Cutoffs on Results From the Phase 3 OPTIMAL Study of Oral Octreotide Capsules in Adult Patients With Acromegaly
title_fullStr MON-LB57 Impact of Imputation Method and Response Cutoffs on Results From the Phase 3 OPTIMAL Study of Oral Octreotide Capsules in Adult Patients With Acromegaly
title_full_unstemmed MON-LB57 Impact of Imputation Method and Response Cutoffs on Results From the Phase 3 OPTIMAL Study of Oral Octreotide Capsules in Adult Patients With Acromegaly
title_short MON-LB57 Impact of Imputation Method and Response Cutoffs on Results From the Phase 3 OPTIMAL Study of Oral Octreotide Capsules in Adult Patients With Acromegaly
title_sort mon-lb57 impact of imputation method and response cutoffs on results from the phase 3 optimal study of oral octreotide capsules in adult patients with acromegaly
topic Neuroendocrinology and Pituitary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7209634/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvaa046.2120
work_keys_str_mv AT samsonsusanleanne monlb57impactofimputationmethodandresponsecutoffsonresultsfromthephase3optimalstudyoforaloctreotidecapsulesinadultpatientswithacromegaly
AT nachtigalllisab monlb57impactofimputationmethodandresponsecutoffsonresultsfromthephase3optimalstudyoforaloctreotidecapsulesinadultpatientswithacromegaly
AT fleseriumaria monlb57impactofimputationmethodandresponsecutoffsonresultsfromthephase3optimalstudyoforaloctreotidecapsulesinadultpatientswithacromegaly
AT gordonmurrayb monlb57impactofimputationmethodandresponsecutoffsonresultsfromthephase3optimalstudyoforaloctreotidecapsulesinadultpatientswithacromegaly
AT jensterlemojca monlb57impactofimputationmethodandresponsecutoffsonresultsfromthephase3optimalstudyoforaloctreotidecapsulesinadultpatientswithacromegaly
AT elenkovaatanaska monlb57impactofimputationmethodandresponsecutoffsonresultsfromthephase3optimalstudyoforaloctreotidecapsulesinadultpatientswithacromegaly
AT ludlamwilliamhenry monlb57impactofimputationmethodandresponsecutoffsonresultsfromthephase3optimalstudyoforaloctreotidecapsulesinadultpatientswithacromegaly
AT patougary monlb57impactofimputationmethodandresponsecutoffsonresultsfromthephase3optimalstudyoforaloctreotidecapsulesinadultpatientswithacromegaly
AT havivasi monlb57impactofimputationmethodandresponsecutoffsonresultsfromthephase3optimalstudyoforaloctreotidecapsulesinadultpatientswithacromegaly
AT biermasznienke monlb57impactofimputationmethodandresponsecutoffsonresultsfromthephase3optimalstudyoforaloctreotidecapsulesinadultpatientswithacromegaly
AT trainerpeterjames monlb57impactofimputationmethodandresponsecutoffsonresultsfromthephase3optimalstudyoforaloctreotidecapsulesinadultpatientswithacromegaly
AT strasburgerchristianjoseph monlb57impactofimputationmethodandresponsecutoffsonresultsfromthephase3optimalstudyoforaloctreotidecapsulesinadultpatientswithacromegaly
AT kennedylaurence monlb57impactofimputationmethodandresponsecutoffsonresultsfromthephase3optimalstudyoforaloctreotidecapsulesinadultpatientswithacromegaly
AT melmedshlomo monlb57impactofimputationmethodandresponsecutoffsonresultsfromthephase3optimalstudyoforaloctreotidecapsulesinadultpatientswithacromegaly