Cargando…

Effect Size in Surgical Intervention Into Shoulder: What Procedures Are Game Changers and What Are Not?

A number of surgical procedures are performed to treat a variety of shoulder pathologies. What is currently not understood is which of these surgical interventions provide the most improvement in patient-reported pain and function. QUESTIONS: We aimed to determine, from a patient's perspective,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paraparan, Ragu, Lam, Patrick H., Murrell, George A. C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7209793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32440636
http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-20-00022
_version_ 1783531157480013824
author Paraparan, Ragu
Lam, Patrick H.
Murrell, George A. C.
author_facet Paraparan, Ragu
Lam, Patrick H.
Murrell, George A. C.
author_sort Paraparan, Ragu
collection PubMed
description A number of surgical procedures are performed to treat a variety of shoulder pathologies. What is currently not understood is which of these surgical interventions provide the most improvement in patient-reported pain and function. QUESTIONS: We aimed to determine, from a patient's perspective, which were the most effective commonly performed surgical procedures for disorders of the shoulder and which were not. METHODS: This study was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from patients who underwent shoulder surgery by a single surgeon. To be included, at least 20 patients needed to have undergone that procedure and completed a questionnaire evaluating their shoulders function preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively. The primary outcome was change in response to the question “how is your shoulder overall?” Effect size is reported as Cohen's d (standardized mean difference). RESULTS: Two thousand two hundred six surgical procedures in 13 categories met the inclusion criteria. All procedures were associated with improvements in the patient-ranked overall shoulder status at 6 months (P < 0.01 to P < 0.0001). Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) provided the greatest effect size (improvement) in the overall shoulder status (d = 3.14, 95% CI, 2.49 to 3.79), followed by total shoulder arthroplasty (d = 2.60, 95% CI, 2.10 to 3.10) and capsular release (d = 1.41, 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.75). RTSA provided the greatest effect size in patient-reported shoulder pain, whereas capsular release provided the greatest effect size in patient-reported shoulder function. Acromioclavicular joint resection (d = 1.22, 95% CI, 0.56 to 1.88) and acromioplasty (d = 1.29, 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.61) provided the least effect size overall. CONCLUSION: All shoulder surgical procedures in this study provided a notable patient-perceived therapeutic benefit in a relatively short period of time (6 months). RTSA, total shoulder arthroplasty, and capsular release are the most effective procedures. Acromioplasty and acromioclavicular resection are the least effective.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7209793
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72097932020-05-21 Effect Size in Surgical Intervention Into Shoulder: What Procedures Are Game Changers and What Are Not? Paraparan, Ragu Lam, Patrick H. Murrell, George A. C. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev Research Article A number of surgical procedures are performed to treat a variety of shoulder pathologies. What is currently not understood is which of these surgical interventions provide the most improvement in patient-reported pain and function. QUESTIONS: We aimed to determine, from a patient's perspective, which were the most effective commonly performed surgical procedures for disorders of the shoulder and which were not. METHODS: This study was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from patients who underwent shoulder surgery by a single surgeon. To be included, at least 20 patients needed to have undergone that procedure and completed a questionnaire evaluating their shoulders function preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively. The primary outcome was change in response to the question “how is your shoulder overall?” Effect size is reported as Cohen's d (standardized mean difference). RESULTS: Two thousand two hundred six surgical procedures in 13 categories met the inclusion criteria. All procedures were associated with improvements in the patient-ranked overall shoulder status at 6 months (P < 0.01 to P < 0.0001). Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) provided the greatest effect size (improvement) in the overall shoulder status (d = 3.14, 95% CI, 2.49 to 3.79), followed by total shoulder arthroplasty (d = 2.60, 95% CI, 2.10 to 3.10) and capsular release (d = 1.41, 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.75). RTSA provided the greatest effect size in patient-reported shoulder pain, whereas capsular release provided the greatest effect size in patient-reported shoulder function. Acromioclavicular joint resection (d = 1.22, 95% CI, 0.56 to 1.88) and acromioplasty (d = 1.29, 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.61) provided the least effect size overall. CONCLUSION: All shoulder surgical procedures in this study provided a notable patient-perceived therapeutic benefit in a relatively short period of time (6 months). RTSA, total shoulder arthroplasty, and capsular release are the most effective procedures. Acromioplasty and acromioclavicular resection are the least effective. Wolters Kluwer 2020-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7209793/ /pubmed/32440636 http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-20-00022 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Paraparan, Ragu
Lam, Patrick H.
Murrell, George A. C.
Effect Size in Surgical Intervention Into Shoulder: What Procedures Are Game Changers and What Are Not?
title Effect Size in Surgical Intervention Into Shoulder: What Procedures Are Game Changers and What Are Not?
title_full Effect Size in Surgical Intervention Into Shoulder: What Procedures Are Game Changers and What Are Not?
title_fullStr Effect Size in Surgical Intervention Into Shoulder: What Procedures Are Game Changers and What Are Not?
title_full_unstemmed Effect Size in Surgical Intervention Into Shoulder: What Procedures Are Game Changers and What Are Not?
title_short Effect Size in Surgical Intervention Into Shoulder: What Procedures Are Game Changers and What Are Not?
title_sort effect size in surgical intervention into shoulder: what procedures are game changers and what are not?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7209793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32440636
http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-20-00022
work_keys_str_mv AT paraparanragu effectsizeinsurgicalinterventionintoshoulderwhatproceduresaregamechangersandwhatarenot
AT lampatrickh effectsizeinsurgicalinterventionintoshoulderwhatproceduresaregamechangersandwhatarenot
AT murrellgeorgeac effectsizeinsurgicalinterventionintoshoulderwhatproceduresaregamechangersandwhatarenot