Cargando…
Breast Implant Illness: A Biofilm Hypothesis
BACKGROUND: “Breast implant illness” (BII) is a poorly defined cluster of nonspecific symptoms, attributed by patients as being caused by their breast implants. These symptoms can include joint pain, skin and hair changes, concentration, and fatigue. Many patients complaining of BII symptoms are dis...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7209857/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32440423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002755 |
_version_ | 1783531172042637312 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Mark Ponraja, Ganesa McLeod, Kevin Chong, Smathi |
author_facet | Lee, Mark Ponraja, Ganesa McLeod, Kevin Chong, Smathi |
author_sort | Lee, Mark |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: “Breast implant illness” (BII) is a poorly defined cluster of nonspecific symptoms, attributed by patients as being caused by their breast implants. These symptoms can include joint pain, skin and hair changes, concentration, and fatigue. Many patients complaining of BII symptoms are dismissed as psychosomatic. There are currently over 10,000 peer-reviewed articles on breast implants, but at the time of commencing this study, only 2 articles discussed this entity. At the same time, mainstream media and social media are exploding with nonscientific discussion about BII. METHODS: We have prospectively followed 50 consecutive patients, self-referring for explantation due to BII. We analyzed their preoperative symptoms and followed up each patient with a Patient-Reported Outcome Questionnaire. All implants and capsules were, if possible, removed en bloc. Explanted implants were photographed. Implant shell and capsule sent for histology and microbiological culture. RESULTS: BII symptoms were not shown to correlate with any particular implant type, surface, or fill. There was no significant finding as to duration of implant or location of original surgery. Chronic infection was found in 36% of cases with Propionibacterium acnes the most common finding. Histologically, synoviocyte metaplasia was found in a significantly greater incidence than a matched cohort that had no BII symptoms (P = 0.0164). Eighty-four percent of patients reported partial or complete resolution of BII symptoms on Patient-Reported Outcome Questionnaire. None of the 50 patients would consider having breast implants again. CONCLUSION: The authors believe BII to be a genuine entity worthy of further study. We have identified microbiological and histological abnormalities in a significant number of patients identifying as having BII. A large proportion of these patients have reported resolution or improvement of their symptoms in patient-reported outcomes. Improved microbiology culture techniques may identify a larger proportion of chronic infection, and further investigation of immune phenotypes and toxicology may also be warranted in this group. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7209857 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72098572020-05-21 Breast Implant Illness: A Biofilm Hypothesis Lee, Mark Ponraja, Ganesa McLeod, Kevin Chong, Smathi Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article BACKGROUND: “Breast implant illness” (BII) is a poorly defined cluster of nonspecific symptoms, attributed by patients as being caused by their breast implants. These symptoms can include joint pain, skin and hair changes, concentration, and fatigue. Many patients complaining of BII symptoms are dismissed as psychosomatic. There are currently over 10,000 peer-reviewed articles on breast implants, but at the time of commencing this study, only 2 articles discussed this entity. At the same time, mainstream media and social media are exploding with nonscientific discussion about BII. METHODS: We have prospectively followed 50 consecutive patients, self-referring for explantation due to BII. We analyzed their preoperative symptoms and followed up each patient with a Patient-Reported Outcome Questionnaire. All implants and capsules were, if possible, removed en bloc. Explanted implants were photographed. Implant shell and capsule sent for histology and microbiological culture. RESULTS: BII symptoms were not shown to correlate with any particular implant type, surface, or fill. There was no significant finding as to duration of implant or location of original surgery. Chronic infection was found in 36% of cases with Propionibacterium acnes the most common finding. Histologically, synoviocyte metaplasia was found in a significantly greater incidence than a matched cohort that had no BII symptoms (P = 0.0164). Eighty-four percent of patients reported partial or complete resolution of BII symptoms on Patient-Reported Outcome Questionnaire. None of the 50 patients would consider having breast implants again. CONCLUSION: The authors believe BII to be a genuine entity worthy of further study. We have identified microbiological and histological abnormalities in a significant number of patients identifying as having BII. A large proportion of these patients have reported resolution or improvement of their symptoms in patient-reported outcomes. Improved microbiology culture techniques may identify a larger proportion of chronic infection, and further investigation of immune phenotypes and toxicology may also be warranted in this group. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7209857/ /pubmed/32440423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002755 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Lee, Mark Ponraja, Ganesa McLeod, Kevin Chong, Smathi Breast Implant Illness: A Biofilm Hypothesis |
title | Breast Implant Illness: A Biofilm Hypothesis |
title_full | Breast Implant Illness: A Biofilm Hypothesis |
title_fullStr | Breast Implant Illness: A Biofilm Hypothesis |
title_full_unstemmed | Breast Implant Illness: A Biofilm Hypothesis |
title_short | Breast Implant Illness: A Biofilm Hypothesis |
title_sort | breast implant illness: a biofilm hypothesis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7209857/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32440423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002755 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leemark breastimplantillnessabiofilmhypothesis AT ponrajaganesa breastimplantillnessabiofilmhypothesis AT mcleodkevin breastimplantillnessabiofilmhypothesis AT chongsmathi breastimplantillnessabiofilmhypothesis |