Cargando…

Consecutive 265 Profunda Artery Perforator Flaps: Refinements, Satisfaction, and Functional Outcomes

INTRODUCTION: The ideal form of breast reconstruction provides total permanent restoration of the breast mound. When a deep inferior epigastric (DIEP) flap is not an option or does not provide significant volume, a secondary source must be considered. In our practice, the profunda artery perforator...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haddock, Nicholas T., Teotia, Sumeet S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7209884/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32440397
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002682
_version_ 1783531178448388096
author Haddock, Nicholas T.
Teotia, Sumeet S.
author_facet Haddock, Nicholas T.
Teotia, Sumeet S.
author_sort Haddock, Nicholas T.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The ideal form of breast reconstruction provides total permanent restoration of the breast mound. When a deep inferior epigastric (DIEP) flap is not an option or does not provide significant volume, a secondary source must be considered. In our practice, the profunda artery perforator (PAP flap) from the thigh has emerged as a second choice. We present our experience with the first 265 PAP flaps used for breast reconstruction at our institution. We specifically focus on refinements, satisfaction, and functional outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of the first 265 PAP flaps at our institution. Patient demographics, perioperative data, and postoperative complications were recorded and analyzed. The Breast Q and Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) were both implemented. Additionally, a satisfaction survey was performed, particularly focused on the donor site. RESULTS: Two hundred sixty-five consecutive PAP flaps were used to reconstruct 244 breasts in 138 patients. The PAP flap was used for bilateral reconstruction (107 patients) and unilateral breast (30 patients). It was used in combination with a second flap as double PAP (21 patients) or combined with a DIEP (62 patients). Mean flap size was 403 g (range: 190–800 g) and mean patient body mass index was 26.5 (range: 18–43). Complications included total flap loss (3%), donor site cellulitis (4.9%), and significant donor site wound (6.8%). Currently, the PAP flap accounts for 16.9% of our autologous breast reconstruction and the DIEP flap accounts for 76.0%. Lower Extremity Functional Scale score was 75/80 (94%) by 6 months. Satisfaction with breast reconstruction was 78.9% and satisfaction with the thigh was 82.1%. CONCLUSIONS: The PAP flap is an excellent option for autologous breast reconstruction. Success rate and complications are similar to those of other options. There is no significant loss to lower extremity function and satisfaction with the reconstruction is comparable with other options.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7209884
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72098842020-05-21 Consecutive 265 Profunda Artery Perforator Flaps: Refinements, Satisfaction, and Functional Outcomes Haddock, Nicholas T. Teotia, Sumeet S. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article INTRODUCTION: The ideal form of breast reconstruction provides total permanent restoration of the breast mound. When a deep inferior epigastric (DIEP) flap is not an option or does not provide significant volume, a secondary source must be considered. In our practice, the profunda artery perforator (PAP flap) from the thigh has emerged as a second choice. We present our experience with the first 265 PAP flaps used for breast reconstruction at our institution. We specifically focus on refinements, satisfaction, and functional outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of the first 265 PAP flaps at our institution. Patient demographics, perioperative data, and postoperative complications were recorded and analyzed. The Breast Q and Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) were both implemented. Additionally, a satisfaction survey was performed, particularly focused on the donor site. RESULTS: Two hundred sixty-five consecutive PAP flaps were used to reconstruct 244 breasts in 138 patients. The PAP flap was used for bilateral reconstruction (107 patients) and unilateral breast (30 patients). It was used in combination with a second flap as double PAP (21 patients) or combined with a DIEP (62 patients). Mean flap size was 403 g (range: 190–800 g) and mean patient body mass index was 26.5 (range: 18–43). Complications included total flap loss (3%), donor site cellulitis (4.9%), and significant donor site wound (6.8%). Currently, the PAP flap accounts for 16.9% of our autologous breast reconstruction and the DIEP flap accounts for 76.0%. Lower Extremity Functional Scale score was 75/80 (94%) by 6 months. Satisfaction with breast reconstruction was 78.9% and satisfaction with the thigh was 82.1%. CONCLUSIONS: The PAP flap is an excellent option for autologous breast reconstruction. Success rate and complications are similar to those of other options. There is no significant loss to lower extremity function and satisfaction with the reconstruction is comparable with other options. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7209884/ /pubmed/32440397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002682 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Original Article
Haddock, Nicholas T.
Teotia, Sumeet S.
Consecutive 265 Profunda Artery Perforator Flaps: Refinements, Satisfaction, and Functional Outcomes
title Consecutive 265 Profunda Artery Perforator Flaps: Refinements, Satisfaction, and Functional Outcomes
title_full Consecutive 265 Profunda Artery Perforator Flaps: Refinements, Satisfaction, and Functional Outcomes
title_fullStr Consecutive 265 Profunda Artery Perforator Flaps: Refinements, Satisfaction, and Functional Outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Consecutive 265 Profunda Artery Perforator Flaps: Refinements, Satisfaction, and Functional Outcomes
title_short Consecutive 265 Profunda Artery Perforator Flaps: Refinements, Satisfaction, and Functional Outcomes
title_sort consecutive 265 profunda artery perforator flaps: refinements, satisfaction, and functional outcomes
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7209884/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32440397
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002682
work_keys_str_mv AT haddocknicholast consecutive265profundaarteryperforatorflapsrefinementssatisfactionandfunctionaloutcomes
AT teotiasumeets consecutive265profundaarteryperforatorflapsrefinementssatisfactionandfunctionaloutcomes