Cargando…

Is there a role for prophylactic mesh in abdominal wall closure after emergency laparotomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Incisional hernias are a common complication of emergency laparotomy and are associated with significant morbidity. Recent studies have found a reduction in incisional hernias when mesh is placed prophylactically during abdominal closure in elective laparotomies. This systematic review w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Burns, F. A., Heywood, E. G., Challand, C. P., Lee, Matthew J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Paris 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7210219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31641872
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-02060-1
_version_ 1783531238296911872
author Burns, F. A.
Heywood, E. G.
Challand, C. P.
Lee, Matthew J.
author_facet Burns, F. A.
Heywood, E. G.
Challand, C. P.
Lee, Matthew J.
author_sort Burns, F. A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Incisional hernias are a common complication of emergency laparotomy and are associated with significant morbidity. Recent studies have found a reduction in incisional hernias when mesh is placed prophylactically during abdominal closure in elective laparotomies. This systematic review will assess the safety and efficacy of prophylactic mesh placement in emergency laparotomy. METHODS: A systematic review was performed according to the PROSPERO registered protocol (CRD42018109283). Papers were dual screened for eligibility, and included when a comparison was made between closure with prophylactic mesh and closure with a standard technique, reported using a comparative design (i.e. case–control, cohort or randomised trial), where the primary outcome was incisional hernia. Bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias in non-randomised studies tool. A meta-analysis of incisional hernia rate was performed to estimate risk ratio using a random effects model (Mantel–Haenszel approach). RESULTS: 332 studies were screened for eligibility, 29 full texts were reviewed and 2 non-randomised studies were included. Both studies were biased due to confounding factors, as closure technique was based on patient risk factors for incisional hernia. Both studies found significantly fewer incisional hernias in the mesh groups [3.2% vs 28.6% (p < 0.001) and 5.9% vs 33.3% (p = 0.0001)]. A meta-analysis of incisional hernia risk favoured prophylactic mesh closure [risk ratio 0.15 (95% CI 0.6–0.35, p < 0.001)]. Neither study found an association between mesh and infection or enterocutaneous fistula. CONCLUSION: This review found that there are limited data to assess the effect or safety profile of prophylactic mesh in the emergency laparotomy setting. The current data cannot reliably assess the use of mesh due to confounding factors, and a randomised controlled trial is required to address this important clinical question.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7210219
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Paris
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72102192020-05-13 Is there a role for prophylactic mesh in abdominal wall closure after emergency laparotomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis Burns, F. A. Heywood, E. G. Challand, C. P. Lee, Matthew J. Hernia Review BACKGROUND: Incisional hernias are a common complication of emergency laparotomy and are associated with significant morbidity. Recent studies have found a reduction in incisional hernias when mesh is placed prophylactically during abdominal closure in elective laparotomies. This systematic review will assess the safety and efficacy of prophylactic mesh placement in emergency laparotomy. METHODS: A systematic review was performed according to the PROSPERO registered protocol (CRD42018109283). Papers were dual screened for eligibility, and included when a comparison was made between closure with prophylactic mesh and closure with a standard technique, reported using a comparative design (i.e. case–control, cohort or randomised trial), where the primary outcome was incisional hernia. Bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias in non-randomised studies tool. A meta-analysis of incisional hernia rate was performed to estimate risk ratio using a random effects model (Mantel–Haenszel approach). RESULTS: 332 studies were screened for eligibility, 29 full texts were reviewed and 2 non-randomised studies were included. Both studies were biased due to confounding factors, as closure technique was based on patient risk factors for incisional hernia. Both studies found significantly fewer incisional hernias in the mesh groups [3.2% vs 28.6% (p < 0.001) and 5.9% vs 33.3% (p = 0.0001)]. A meta-analysis of incisional hernia risk favoured prophylactic mesh closure [risk ratio 0.15 (95% CI 0.6–0.35, p < 0.001)]. Neither study found an association between mesh and infection or enterocutaneous fistula. CONCLUSION: This review found that there are limited data to assess the effect or safety profile of prophylactic mesh in the emergency laparotomy setting. The current data cannot reliably assess the use of mesh due to confounding factors, and a randomised controlled trial is required to address this important clinical question. Springer Paris 2019-10-22 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7210219/ /pubmed/31641872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-02060-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review
Burns, F. A.
Heywood, E. G.
Challand, C. P.
Lee, Matthew J.
Is there a role for prophylactic mesh in abdominal wall closure after emergency laparotomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Is there a role for prophylactic mesh in abdominal wall closure after emergency laparotomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Is there a role for prophylactic mesh in abdominal wall closure after emergency laparotomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Is there a role for prophylactic mesh in abdominal wall closure after emergency laparotomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Is there a role for prophylactic mesh in abdominal wall closure after emergency laparotomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Is there a role for prophylactic mesh in abdominal wall closure after emergency laparotomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort is there a role for prophylactic mesh in abdominal wall closure after emergency laparotomy? a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7210219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31641872
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-02060-1
work_keys_str_mv AT burnsfa istherearoleforprophylacticmeshinabdominalwallclosureafteremergencylaparotomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT heywoodeg istherearoleforprophylacticmeshinabdominalwallclosureafteremergencylaparotomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT challandcp istherearoleforprophylacticmeshinabdominalwallclosureafteremergencylaparotomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT leematthewj istherearoleforprophylacticmeshinabdominalwallclosureafteremergencylaparotomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis