Cargando…
A Systematic Review of the Use and Quality of Qualitative Methods in Concept Elicitation for Measures with Children and Young People
BACKGROUND: Qualitative research is recommended in concept elicitation for patient-reported outcome measures to ensure item content validity, and those developing measures are encouraged to report qualitative methods in detail. However, in measure development for children and young people, direct re...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7210227/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32346817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40271-020-00414-x |
_version_ | 1783531240149745664 |
---|---|
author | Husbands, Samantha Mitchell, Paul Mark Coast, Joanna |
author_facet | Husbands, Samantha Mitchell, Paul Mark Coast, Joanna |
author_sort | Husbands, Samantha |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Qualitative research is recommended in concept elicitation for patient-reported outcome measures to ensure item content validity, and those developing measures are encouraged to report qualitative methods in detail. However, in measure development for children and young people, direct research can be challenging due to problems with engagement and communication. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic review was to (i) explore the qualitative and adapted data collection techniques that research teams have used with children and young people to generate items in existing measures and (ii) assess the quality of qualitative reporting. METHODS: Three electronic databases were searched with forward citation and reference list searching of key papers. Papers included in the review were empirical studies documenting qualitative concept elicitation with children and young people. Data on qualitative methods were extracted, and all studies were checked against a qualitative reporting checklist. RESULTS: A total of 37 studies were included. The quality of reporting of qualitative approaches for item generation was low, with information missing on sampling, data analysis and the research team, all of which are key to facilitating judgements around measure content validity. Few papers reported adapting methods to be more suitable for children and young people, potentially missing opportunities to more meaningfully engage children in concept elicitation work. CONCLUSIONS: Research teams should ensure that they are documenting detailed and transparent processes for concept elicitation. Guidelines are currently lacking in the development and reporting of item generation for children, with this being an important area for future research. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40271-020-00414-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7210227 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72102272020-05-13 A Systematic Review of the Use and Quality of Qualitative Methods in Concept Elicitation for Measures with Children and Young People Husbands, Samantha Mitchell, Paul Mark Coast, Joanna Patient Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Qualitative research is recommended in concept elicitation for patient-reported outcome measures to ensure item content validity, and those developing measures are encouraged to report qualitative methods in detail. However, in measure development for children and young people, direct research can be challenging due to problems with engagement and communication. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic review was to (i) explore the qualitative and adapted data collection techniques that research teams have used with children and young people to generate items in existing measures and (ii) assess the quality of qualitative reporting. METHODS: Three electronic databases were searched with forward citation and reference list searching of key papers. Papers included in the review were empirical studies documenting qualitative concept elicitation with children and young people. Data on qualitative methods were extracted, and all studies were checked against a qualitative reporting checklist. RESULTS: A total of 37 studies were included. The quality of reporting of qualitative approaches for item generation was low, with information missing on sampling, data analysis and the research team, all of which are key to facilitating judgements around measure content validity. Few papers reported adapting methods to be more suitable for children and young people, potentially missing opportunities to more meaningfully engage children in concept elicitation work. CONCLUSIONS: Research teams should ensure that they are documenting detailed and transparent processes for concept elicitation. Guidelines are currently lacking in the development and reporting of item generation for children, with this being an important area for future research. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40271-020-00414-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2020-04-29 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7210227/ /pubmed/32346817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40271-020-00414-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Husbands, Samantha Mitchell, Paul Mark Coast, Joanna A Systematic Review of the Use and Quality of Qualitative Methods in Concept Elicitation for Measures with Children and Young People |
title | A Systematic Review of the Use and Quality of Qualitative Methods in Concept Elicitation for Measures with Children and Young People |
title_full | A Systematic Review of the Use and Quality of Qualitative Methods in Concept Elicitation for Measures with Children and Young People |
title_fullStr | A Systematic Review of the Use and Quality of Qualitative Methods in Concept Elicitation for Measures with Children and Young People |
title_full_unstemmed | A Systematic Review of the Use and Quality of Qualitative Methods in Concept Elicitation for Measures with Children and Young People |
title_short | A Systematic Review of the Use and Quality of Qualitative Methods in Concept Elicitation for Measures with Children and Young People |
title_sort | systematic review of the use and quality of qualitative methods in concept elicitation for measures with children and young people |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7210227/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32346817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40271-020-00414-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT husbandssamantha asystematicreviewoftheuseandqualityofqualitativemethodsinconceptelicitationformeasureswithchildrenandyoungpeople AT mitchellpaulmark asystematicreviewoftheuseandqualityofqualitativemethodsinconceptelicitationformeasureswithchildrenandyoungpeople AT coastjoanna asystematicreviewoftheuseandqualityofqualitativemethodsinconceptelicitationformeasureswithchildrenandyoungpeople AT husbandssamantha systematicreviewoftheuseandqualityofqualitativemethodsinconceptelicitationformeasureswithchildrenandyoungpeople AT mitchellpaulmark systematicreviewoftheuseandqualityofqualitativemethodsinconceptelicitationformeasureswithchildrenandyoungpeople AT coastjoanna systematicreviewoftheuseandqualityofqualitativemethodsinconceptelicitationformeasureswithchildrenandyoungpeople |