Cargando…

Current and Future Trends in Life Sciences Training: Questionnaire Study

BACKGROUND: Every year, the life science field spends billions of dollars on educational activities worldwide. The continuing professional development of employees, especially in this field, encompasses great challenges. Emerging technologies appear to offer opportunity, but relatively little resear...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Magagna, William, Wang, Nicole, Peck, Kyle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7210494/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32329739
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/15877
_version_ 1783531284170014720
author Magagna, William
Wang, Nicole
Peck, Kyle
author_facet Magagna, William
Wang, Nicole
Peck, Kyle
author_sort Magagna, William
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Every year, the life science field spends billions of dollars on educational activities worldwide. The continuing professional development of employees, especially in this field, encompasses great challenges. Emerging technologies appear to offer opportunity, but relatively little research has been done on the effectiveness of pedagogies and tools that have been used in the life sciences, and even less research has been devoted to understanding the potential power of emerging options that might determine the field’s future. OBJECTIVE: In collaboration with the Life Sciences Trainers & Educators Network (LTEN), this study investigated the current state of the pedagogies and tools currently adopted by corporate training professionals in the life sciences as well as the professionals’ perceptions of the impacts of emerging technologies on training. METHODS: This study adopted a mixed methods approach that included a survey and a follow-up interview. The survey consists of 18 broad questions with 15 subquestions in each of the five specific sectors of the life sciences field. Interviews were conducted by phone and lasted approximately 40 minutes, covering 18 questions designed to follow-up on findings from the survey items. RESULTS: Both survey and interview results indicated that the professionals were not satisfied with the status quo and that training and education in this field need to change. Most of the techniques and tools currently used have been used for some time. The professionals surveyed were not satisfied with the current techniques and tools and did not find them cost-effective. In addition, the respondents pictured the future of training in this field to be more engaging and effective. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study in a series designed to better understand education and training in the life sciences on a macro level, in order to build a foundation for progress and evolution of the future landscape. Next steps involve developing strategies for how to extend this vision throughout individual organizations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7210494
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72104942020-05-12 Current and Future Trends in Life Sciences Training: Questionnaire Study Magagna, William Wang, Nicole Peck, Kyle JMIR Med Educ Original Paper BACKGROUND: Every year, the life science field spends billions of dollars on educational activities worldwide. The continuing professional development of employees, especially in this field, encompasses great challenges. Emerging technologies appear to offer opportunity, but relatively little research has been done on the effectiveness of pedagogies and tools that have been used in the life sciences, and even less research has been devoted to understanding the potential power of emerging options that might determine the field’s future. OBJECTIVE: In collaboration with the Life Sciences Trainers & Educators Network (LTEN), this study investigated the current state of the pedagogies and tools currently adopted by corporate training professionals in the life sciences as well as the professionals’ perceptions of the impacts of emerging technologies on training. METHODS: This study adopted a mixed methods approach that included a survey and a follow-up interview. The survey consists of 18 broad questions with 15 subquestions in each of the five specific sectors of the life sciences field. Interviews were conducted by phone and lasted approximately 40 minutes, covering 18 questions designed to follow-up on findings from the survey items. RESULTS: Both survey and interview results indicated that the professionals were not satisfied with the status quo and that training and education in this field need to change. Most of the techniques and tools currently used have been used for some time. The professionals surveyed were not satisfied with the current techniques and tools and did not find them cost-effective. In addition, the respondents pictured the future of training in this field to be more engaging and effective. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study in a series designed to better understand education and training in the life sciences on a macro level, in order to build a foundation for progress and evolution of the future landscape. Next steps involve developing strategies for how to extend this vision throughout individual organizations. JMIR Publications 2020-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7210494/ /pubmed/32329739 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/15877 Text en ©William Magagna, Nicole Wang, Kyle Peck. Originally published in JMIR Medical Education (http://mededu.jmir.org), 24.04.2020. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Medical Education, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://mededu.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Magagna, William
Wang, Nicole
Peck, Kyle
Current and Future Trends in Life Sciences Training: Questionnaire Study
title Current and Future Trends in Life Sciences Training: Questionnaire Study
title_full Current and Future Trends in Life Sciences Training: Questionnaire Study
title_fullStr Current and Future Trends in Life Sciences Training: Questionnaire Study
title_full_unstemmed Current and Future Trends in Life Sciences Training: Questionnaire Study
title_short Current and Future Trends in Life Sciences Training: Questionnaire Study
title_sort current and future trends in life sciences training: questionnaire study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7210494/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32329739
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/15877
work_keys_str_mv AT magagnawilliam currentandfuturetrendsinlifesciencestrainingquestionnairestudy
AT wangnicole currentandfuturetrendsinlifesciencestrainingquestionnairestudy
AT peckkyle currentandfuturetrendsinlifesciencestrainingquestionnairestudy