Cargando…
Comparison of device-based physical activity and sedentary behaviour following percutaneous coronary intervention in a cohort from Sweden and Australia: a harmonised, exploratory study
BACKGROUND: Few studies have measured device-based physical activity and sedentary behaviour following a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), with no studies comparing these behaviours between countries using the same methods. The aim of the study was to compare device-based physical activity a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7210676/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32419950 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-020-00164-1 |
_version_ | 1783531313601445888 |
---|---|
author | Freene, Nicole Borg, Sabina McManus, Margaret Mair, Tarryn Tan, Ren Davey, Rachel Öberg, Birgitta Bäck, Maria |
author_facet | Freene, Nicole Borg, Sabina McManus, Margaret Mair, Tarryn Tan, Ren Davey, Rachel Öberg, Birgitta Bäck, Maria |
author_sort | Freene, Nicole |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Few studies have measured device-based physical activity and sedentary behaviour following a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), with no studies comparing these behaviours between countries using the same methods. The aim of the study was to compare device-based physical activity and sedentary behaviour, using a harmonised approach, following a PCI on-entry into centre-based cardiac rehabilitation in two countries. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted at two outpatient cardiac rehabilitation centres in Australia and Sweden. Participants were adults following a PCI and commencing cardiac rehabilitation (Australia n = 50, Sweden n = 133). Prior to discharge from hospital, Australian participants received brief physical activity advice (< 5 mins), while Swedish participants received physical activity counselling for 30 min. A triaxial accelerometer (Actigraph GT3X/ActiSleep) was used to objectively assess physical activity (light (LPA), moderate-to-vigorous (MVPA)) and sedentary behaviour. Outcomes included daily minutes of physical activity and sedentary behaviour, and the proportion and distribution of time spent in each behaviour. RESULTS: There was no difference in age, gender or relationship status between countries. Swedish (S) participants commenced cardiac rehabilitation later than Australian (A) participants (days post-PCI A 16 vs S 22, p < 0.001). Proportionally, Swedish participants were significantly more physically active and less sedentary than Australian participants (LPA A 27% vs S 30%, p < 0.05; MVPA A 5% vs S 7%, p < 0.01; sedentary behaviour A 68% vs S 63%, p < 0.001). When adjusting for wear-time, Australian participants were doing less MVPA minutes (A 42 vs S 64, p < 0.001) and more sedentary behaviour minutes (A 573 vs S 571, p < 0.001) per day. Both Swedish and Australian participants spent a large part of the day sedentary, accumulating 9.5 h per day in sedentary behaviour. CONCLUSION: Swedish PCI participants when commencing cardiac rehabilitation are more physically active than Australian participants. Potential explanatory factors are differences in post-PCI in-hospital physical activity education between countries and pre-existing physical activity levels. Despite this, sedentary behaviour is high in both countries. Internationally, interventions to address sedentary behaviour are indicated post-PCI, in both the acute setting and cardiac rehabilitation, in addition to traditional physical activity and cardiac rehabilitation recommendations. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: Australia: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR): ACTRN12615000995572. Registered 22 September 2015, Sweden: World Health Organization Trial Registration Data Set: NCT02895451. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7210676 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72106762020-05-15 Comparison of device-based physical activity and sedentary behaviour following percutaneous coronary intervention in a cohort from Sweden and Australia: a harmonised, exploratory study Freene, Nicole Borg, Sabina McManus, Margaret Mair, Tarryn Tan, Ren Davey, Rachel Öberg, Birgitta Bäck, Maria BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil Research Article BACKGROUND: Few studies have measured device-based physical activity and sedentary behaviour following a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), with no studies comparing these behaviours between countries using the same methods. The aim of the study was to compare device-based physical activity and sedentary behaviour, using a harmonised approach, following a PCI on-entry into centre-based cardiac rehabilitation in two countries. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted at two outpatient cardiac rehabilitation centres in Australia and Sweden. Participants were adults following a PCI and commencing cardiac rehabilitation (Australia n = 50, Sweden n = 133). Prior to discharge from hospital, Australian participants received brief physical activity advice (< 5 mins), while Swedish participants received physical activity counselling for 30 min. A triaxial accelerometer (Actigraph GT3X/ActiSleep) was used to objectively assess physical activity (light (LPA), moderate-to-vigorous (MVPA)) and sedentary behaviour. Outcomes included daily minutes of physical activity and sedentary behaviour, and the proportion and distribution of time spent in each behaviour. RESULTS: There was no difference in age, gender or relationship status between countries. Swedish (S) participants commenced cardiac rehabilitation later than Australian (A) participants (days post-PCI A 16 vs S 22, p < 0.001). Proportionally, Swedish participants were significantly more physically active and less sedentary than Australian participants (LPA A 27% vs S 30%, p < 0.05; MVPA A 5% vs S 7%, p < 0.01; sedentary behaviour A 68% vs S 63%, p < 0.001). When adjusting for wear-time, Australian participants were doing less MVPA minutes (A 42 vs S 64, p < 0.001) and more sedentary behaviour minutes (A 573 vs S 571, p < 0.001) per day. Both Swedish and Australian participants spent a large part of the day sedentary, accumulating 9.5 h per day in sedentary behaviour. CONCLUSION: Swedish PCI participants when commencing cardiac rehabilitation are more physically active than Australian participants. Potential explanatory factors are differences in post-PCI in-hospital physical activity education between countries and pre-existing physical activity levels. Despite this, sedentary behaviour is high in both countries. Internationally, interventions to address sedentary behaviour are indicated post-PCI, in both the acute setting and cardiac rehabilitation, in addition to traditional physical activity and cardiac rehabilitation recommendations. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: Australia: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR): ACTRN12615000995572. Registered 22 September 2015, Sweden: World Health Organization Trial Registration Data Set: NCT02895451. BioMed Central 2020-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7210676/ /pubmed/32419950 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-020-00164-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Freene, Nicole Borg, Sabina McManus, Margaret Mair, Tarryn Tan, Ren Davey, Rachel Öberg, Birgitta Bäck, Maria Comparison of device-based physical activity and sedentary behaviour following percutaneous coronary intervention in a cohort from Sweden and Australia: a harmonised, exploratory study |
title | Comparison of device-based physical activity and sedentary behaviour following percutaneous coronary intervention in a cohort from Sweden and Australia: a harmonised, exploratory study |
title_full | Comparison of device-based physical activity and sedentary behaviour following percutaneous coronary intervention in a cohort from Sweden and Australia: a harmonised, exploratory study |
title_fullStr | Comparison of device-based physical activity and sedentary behaviour following percutaneous coronary intervention in a cohort from Sweden and Australia: a harmonised, exploratory study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of device-based physical activity and sedentary behaviour following percutaneous coronary intervention in a cohort from Sweden and Australia: a harmonised, exploratory study |
title_short | Comparison of device-based physical activity and sedentary behaviour following percutaneous coronary intervention in a cohort from Sweden and Australia: a harmonised, exploratory study |
title_sort | comparison of device-based physical activity and sedentary behaviour following percutaneous coronary intervention in a cohort from sweden and australia: a harmonised, exploratory study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7210676/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32419950 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-020-00164-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT freenenicole comparisonofdevicebasedphysicalactivityandsedentarybehaviourfollowingpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninacohortfromswedenandaustraliaaharmonisedexploratorystudy AT borgsabina comparisonofdevicebasedphysicalactivityandsedentarybehaviourfollowingpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninacohortfromswedenandaustraliaaharmonisedexploratorystudy AT mcmanusmargaret comparisonofdevicebasedphysicalactivityandsedentarybehaviourfollowingpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninacohortfromswedenandaustraliaaharmonisedexploratorystudy AT mairtarryn comparisonofdevicebasedphysicalactivityandsedentarybehaviourfollowingpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninacohortfromswedenandaustraliaaharmonisedexploratorystudy AT tanren comparisonofdevicebasedphysicalactivityandsedentarybehaviourfollowingpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninacohortfromswedenandaustraliaaharmonisedexploratorystudy AT daveyrachel comparisonofdevicebasedphysicalactivityandsedentarybehaviourfollowingpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninacohortfromswedenandaustraliaaharmonisedexploratorystudy AT obergbirgitta comparisonofdevicebasedphysicalactivityandsedentarybehaviourfollowingpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninacohortfromswedenandaustraliaaharmonisedexploratorystudy AT backmaria comparisonofdevicebasedphysicalactivityandsedentarybehaviourfollowingpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninacohortfromswedenandaustraliaaharmonisedexploratorystudy |