Cargando…

Comparison of device-based physical activity and sedentary behaviour following percutaneous coronary intervention in a cohort from Sweden and Australia: a harmonised, exploratory study

BACKGROUND: Few studies have measured device-based physical activity and sedentary behaviour following a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), with no studies comparing these behaviours between countries using the same methods. The aim of the study was to compare device-based physical activity a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Freene, Nicole, Borg, Sabina, McManus, Margaret, Mair, Tarryn, Tan, Ren, Davey, Rachel, Öberg, Birgitta, Bäck, Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7210676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32419950
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-020-00164-1
_version_ 1783531313601445888
author Freene, Nicole
Borg, Sabina
McManus, Margaret
Mair, Tarryn
Tan, Ren
Davey, Rachel
Öberg, Birgitta
Bäck, Maria
author_facet Freene, Nicole
Borg, Sabina
McManus, Margaret
Mair, Tarryn
Tan, Ren
Davey, Rachel
Öberg, Birgitta
Bäck, Maria
author_sort Freene, Nicole
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Few studies have measured device-based physical activity and sedentary behaviour following a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), with no studies comparing these behaviours between countries using the same methods. The aim of the study was to compare device-based physical activity and sedentary behaviour, using a harmonised approach, following a PCI on-entry into centre-based cardiac rehabilitation in two countries. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted at two outpatient cardiac rehabilitation centres in Australia and Sweden. Participants were adults following a PCI and commencing cardiac rehabilitation (Australia n = 50, Sweden n = 133). Prior to discharge from hospital, Australian participants received brief physical activity advice (< 5 mins), while Swedish participants received physical activity counselling for 30 min. A triaxial accelerometer (Actigraph GT3X/ActiSleep) was used to objectively assess physical activity (light (LPA), moderate-to-vigorous (MVPA)) and sedentary behaviour. Outcomes included daily minutes of physical activity and sedentary behaviour, and the proportion and distribution of time spent in each behaviour. RESULTS: There was no difference in age, gender or relationship status between countries. Swedish (S) participants commenced cardiac rehabilitation later than Australian (A) participants (days post-PCI A 16 vs S 22, p < 0.001). Proportionally, Swedish participants were significantly more physically active and less sedentary than Australian participants (LPA A 27% vs S 30%, p < 0.05; MVPA A 5% vs S 7%, p < 0.01; sedentary behaviour A 68% vs S 63%, p < 0.001). When adjusting for wear-time, Australian participants were doing less MVPA minutes (A 42 vs S 64, p < 0.001) and more sedentary behaviour minutes (A 573 vs S 571, p < 0.001) per day. Both Swedish and Australian participants spent a large part of the day sedentary, accumulating 9.5 h per day in sedentary behaviour. CONCLUSION: Swedish PCI participants when commencing cardiac rehabilitation are more physically active than Australian participants. Potential explanatory factors are differences in post-PCI in-hospital physical activity education between countries and pre-existing physical activity levels. Despite this, sedentary behaviour is high in both countries. Internationally, interventions to address sedentary behaviour are indicated post-PCI, in both the acute setting and cardiac rehabilitation, in addition to traditional physical activity and cardiac rehabilitation recommendations. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: Australia: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR): ACTRN12615000995572. Registered 22 September 2015, Sweden: World Health Organization Trial Registration Data Set: NCT02895451.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7210676
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72106762020-05-15 Comparison of device-based physical activity and sedentary behaviour following percutaneous coronary intervention in a cohort from Sweden and Australia: a harmonised, exploratory study Freene, Nicole Borg, Sabina McManus, Margaret Mair, Tarryn Tan, Ren Davey, Rachel Öberg, Birgitta Bäck, Maria BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil Research Article BACKGROUND: Few studies have measured device-based physical activity and sedentary behaviour following a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), with no studies comparing these behaviours between countries using the same methods. The aim of the study was to compare device-based physical activity and sedentary behaviour, using a harmonised approach, following a PCI on-entry into centre-based cardiac rehabilitation in two countries. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted at two outpatient cardiac rehabilitation centres in Australia and Sweden. Participants were adults following a PCI and commencing cardiac rehabilitation (Australia n = 50, Sweden n = 133). Prior to discharge from hospital, Australian participants received brief physical activity advice (< 5 mins), while Swedish participants received physical activity counselling for 30 min. A triaxial accelerometer (Actigraph GT3X/ActiSleep) was used to objectively assess physical activity (light (LPA), moderate-to-vigorous (MVPA)) and sedentary behaviour. Outcomes included daily minutes of physical activity and sedentary behaviour, and the proportion and distribution of time spent in each behaviour. RESULTS: There was no difference in age, gender or relationship status between countries. Swedish (S) participants commenced cardiac rehabilitation later than Australian (A) participants (days post-PCI A 16 vs S 22, p < 0.001). Proportionally, Swedish participants were significantly more physically active and less sedentary than Australian participants (LPA A 27% vs S 30%, p < 0.05; MVPA A 5% vs S 7%, p < 0.01; sedentary behaviour A 68% vs S 63%, p < 0.001). When adjusting for wear-time, Australian participants were doing less MVPA minutes (A 42 vs S 64, p < 0.001) and more sedentary behaviour minutes (A 573 vs S 571, p < 0.001) per day. Both Swedish and Australian participants spent a large part of the day sedentary, accumulating 9.5 h per day in sedentary behaviour. CONCLUSION: Swedish PCI participants when commencing cardiac rehabilitation are more physically active than Australian participants. Potential explanatory factors are differences in post-PCI in-hospital physical activity education between countries and pre-existing physical activity levels. Despite this, sedentary behaviour is high in both countries. Internationally, interventions to address sedentary behaviour are indicated post-PCI, in both the acute setting and cardiac rehabilitation, in addition to traditional physical activity and cardiac rehabilitation recommendations. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: Australia: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR): ACTRN12615000995572. Registered 22 September 2015, Sweden: World Health Organization Trial Registration Data Set: NCT02895451. BioMed Central 2020-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7210676/ /pubmed/32419950 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-020-00164-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Freene, Nicole
Borg, Sabina
McManus, Margaret
Mair, Tarryn
Tan, Ren
Davey, Rachel
Öberg, Birgitta
Bäck, Maria
Comparison of device-based physical activity and sedentary behaviour following percutaneous coronary intervention in a cohort from Sweden and Australia: a harmonised, exploratory study
title Comparison of device-based physical activity and sedentary behaviour following percutaneous coronary intervention in a cohort from Sweden and Australia: a harmonised, exploratory study
title_full Comparison of device-based physical activity and sedentary behaviour following percutaneous coronary intervention in a cohort from Sweden and Australia: a harmonised, exploratory study
title_fullStr Comparison of device-based physical activity and sedentary behaviour following percutaneous coronary intervention in a cohort from Sweden and Australia: a harmonised, exploratory study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of device-based physical activity and sedentary behaviour following percutaneous coronary intervention in a cohort from Sweden and Australia: a harmonised, exploratory study
title_short Comparison of device-based physical activity and sedentary behaviour following percutaneous coronary intervention in a cohort from Sweden and Australia: a harmonised, exploratory study
title_sort comparison of device-based physical activity and sedentary behaviour following percutaneous coronary intervention in a cohort from sweden and australia: a harmonised, exploratory study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7210676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32419950
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-020-00164-1
work_keys_str_mv AT freenenicole comparisonofdevicebasedphysicalactivityandsedentarybehaviourfollowingpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninacohortfromswedenandaustraliaaharmonisedexploratorystudy
AT borgsabina comparisonofdevicebasedphysicalactivityandsedentarybehaviourfollowingpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninacohortfromswedenandaustraliaaharmonisedexploratorystudy
AT mcmanusmargaret comparisonofdevicebasedphysicalactivityandsedentarybehaviourfollowingpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninacohortfromswedenandaustraliaaharmonisedexploratorystudy
AT mairtarryn comparisonofdevicebasedphysicalactivityandsedentarybehaviourfollowingpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninacohortfromswedenandaustraliaaharmonisedexploratorystudy
AT tanren comparisonofdevicebasedphysicalactivityandsedentarybehaviourfollowingpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninacohortfromswedenandaustraliaaharmonisedexploratorystudy
AT daveyrachel comparisonofdevicebasedphysicalactivityandsedentarybehaviourfollowingpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninacohortfromswedenandaustraliaaharmonisedexploratorystudy
AT obergbirgitta comparisonofdevicebasedphysicalactivityandsedentarybehaviourfollowingpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninacohortfromswedenandaustraliaaharmonisedexploratorystudy
AT backmaria comparisonofdevicebasedphysicalactivityandsedentarybehaviourfollowingpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninacohortfromswedenandaustraliaaharmonisedexploratorystudy