Cargando…

Comparison of the corrected intraocular pressure by tonopachy with that of Goldmann applanation tonometry in normal and glaucomatous patients

PURPOSE: To compare corrected intraocular pressure (IOP) by tonopachy with that of Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) in normal and glaucomatous patients. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, IOP and central corneal thickness (CCT) were measured in 426 eyes (213 normal eyes and 213 glaucomatous...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Velis, Girish, Kavitha, Srinivasan, Zebardast, Nazlee, Sengupta, Sabyasachi, Venkatesh, Rengaraj
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7210839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32174582
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_570_19
_version_ 1783531339849400320
author Velis, Girish
Kavitha, Srinivasan
Zebardast, Nazlee
Sengupta, Sabyasachi
Venkatesh, Rengaraj
author_facet Velis, Girish
Kavitha, Srinivasan
Zebardast, Nazlee
Sengupta, Sabyasachi
Venkatesh, Rengaraj
author_sort Velis, Girish
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare corrected intraocular pressure (IOP) by tonopachy with that of Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) in normal and glaucomatous patients. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, IOP and central corneal thickness (CCT) were measured in 426 eyes (213 normal eyes and 213 glaucomatous eyes) of 426 patients by tonopachy followed by GAT and ultrasound pachymetry. IOP was corrected for CCT by in-built formula in tonopachy and Ehlers correction factor for Goldmann tonometer. Limits of agreements were assessed using Bland–Altman plots. Intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated to estimate the absolute agreement between single and average measurements of IOP and CCT of tonopachy with that of Goldmann tonometer and ultrasound pachymetry respectively. RESULTS: Mean corrected IOP measured with tonopachy and GAT in glaucomatous eyes was 17.63 ± 5.04 mmHg and 19.42 ± 5.83 mmHg, and in controls it was 13.4 ± 2.5 mmHg and 16.2 ± 3.1 mmHg, respectively. Limits of agreement ranged from –4.63 to +9.25 mmHg for total population (mean = 2.31), ˗6.01 to +9.59 mmHg (mean = 1.79) for glaucoma group and ˗2.99 to +8.65 mmHg (mean = 2.83) for controls. Intraclass correlation coefficient for IOP measurement between tonopachy and Goldmann tonometer was 0.84 for total population, 0.85 for glaucoma group, and 0.63 for controls, respectively. CONCLUSION: Corrected IOP obtained by tonopachy showed moderate agreement with GAT and it is more in glaucoma patients than controls. Thus, tonopachy can be used as a screening tool, but cannot replace GAT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7210839
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72108392020-05-12 Comparison of the corrected intraocular pressure by tonopachy with that of Goldmann applanation tonometry in normal and glaucomatous patients Velis, Girish Kavitha, Srinivasan Zebardast, Nazlee Sengupta, Sabyasachi Venkatesh, Rengaraj Indian J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: To compare corrected intraocular pressure (IOP) by tonopachy with that of Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) in normal and glaucomatous patients. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, IOP and central corneal thickness (CCT) were measured in 426 eyes (213 normal eyes and 213 glaucomatous eyes) of 426 patients by tonopachy followed by GAT and ultrasound pachymetry. IOP was corrected for CCT by in-built formula in tonopachy and Ehlers correction factor for Goldmann tonometer. Limits of agreements were assessed using Bland–Altman plots. Intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated to estimate the absolute agreement between single and average measurements of IOP and CCT of tonopachy with that of Goldmann tonometer and ultrasound pachymetry respectively. RESULTS: Mean corrected IOP measured with tonopachy and GAT in glaucomatous eyes was 17.63 ± 5.04 mmHg and 19.42 ± 5.83 mmHg, and in controls it was 13.4 ± 2.5 mmHg and 16.2 ± 3.1 mmHg, respectively. Limits of agreement ranged from –4.63 to +9.25 mmHg for total population (mean = 2.31), ˗6.01 to +9.59 mmHg (mean = 1.79) for glaucoma group and ˗2.99 to +8.65 mmHg (mean = 2.83) for controls. Intraclass correlation coefficient for IOP measurement between tonopachy and Goldmann tonometer was 0.84 for total population, 0.85 for glaucoma group, and 0.63 for controls, respectively. CONCLUSION: Corrected IOP obtained by tonopachy showed moderate agreement with GAT and it is more in glaucoma patients than controls. Thus, tonopachy can be used as a screening tool, but cannot replace GAT. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020-04 2020-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7210839/ /pubmed/32174582 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_570_19 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Indian Journal of Ophthalmology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Velis, Girish
Kavitha, Srinivasan
Zebardast, Nazlee
Sengupta, Sabyasachi
Venkatesh, Rengaraj
Comparison of the corrected intraocular pressure by tonopachy with that of Goldmann applanation tonometry in normal and glaucomatous patients
title Comparison of the corrected intraocular pressure by tonopachy with that of Goldmann applanation tonometry in normal and glaucomatous patients
title_full Comparison of the corrected intraocular pressure by tonopachy with that of Goldmann applanation tonometry in normal and glaucomatous patients
title_fullStr Comparison of the corrected intraocular pressure by tonopachy with that of Goldmann applanation tonometry in normal and glaucomatous patients
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the corrected intraocular pressure by tonopachy with that of Goldmann applanation tonometry in normal and glaucomatous patients
title_short Comparison of the corrected intraocular pressure by tonopachy with that of Goldmann applanation tonometry in normal and glaucomatous patients
title_sort comparison of the corrected intraocular pressure by tonopachy with that of goldmann applanation tonometry in normal and glaucomatous patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7210839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32174582
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_570_19
work_keys_str_mv AT velisgirish comparisonofthecorrectedintraocularpressurebytonopachywiththatofgoldmannapplanationtonometryinnormalandglaucomatouspatients
AT kavithasrinivasan comparisonofthecorrectedintraocularpressurebytonopachywiththatofgoldmannapplanationtonometryinnormalandglaucomatouspatients
AT zebardastnazlee comparisonofthecorrectedintraocularpressurebytonopachywiththatofgoldmannapplanationtonometryinnormalandglaucomatouspatients
AT senguptasabyasachi comparisonofthecorrectedintraocularpressurebytonopachywiththatofgoldmannapplanationtonometryinnormalandglaucomatouspatients
AT venkateshrengaraj comparisonofthecorrectedintraocularpressurebytonopachywiththatofgoldmannapplanationtonometryinnormalandglaucomatouspatients