Cargando…

The trinity of ecological contrasts: a case study on rich insect assemblages by means of species, functional and phylogenetic diversity measures

BACKGROUND: The ‘classical’ concept of species diversity was extended in the last decades into other dimensions focusing on the functional and phylogenetic diversity of communities. These measures are often argued to allow a deeper understanding of the mechanisms shaping community assembly along env...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guariento, Elia, Strutzenberger, Patrick, Truxa, Christine, Fiedler, Konrad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7211340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32389122
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12898-020-00298-3
_version_ 1783531437058686976
author Guariento, Elia
Strutzenberger, Patrick
Truxa, Christine
Fiedler, Konrad
author_facet Guariento, Elia
Strutzenberger, Patrick
Truxa, Christine
Fiedler, Konrad
author_sort Guariento, Elia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The ‘classical’ concept of species diversity was extended in the last decades into other dimensions focusing on the functional and phylogenetic diversity of communities. These measures are often argued to allow a deeper understanding of the mechanisms shaping community assembly along environmental gradients. Because of practical impediments, thus far only very few studies evaluated the performance of these diversity measures on large empirical data sets. Here, data on species-rich riparian moth communities under different flood regimes and from three different rivers has been used to compare the power of various diversity measures to uncover ecological contrasts. RESULTS: Contrary to the expectation, classical metrics of species diversity (Hill numbers N1, N2 and N(inf)) and evenness (Buzas-Gibson’s E and Pielous’s J) turned out to be the most powerful measures in unravelling the two gradients investigated in this study (e.g. flood regime and region). Several measures of functional and phylogenetic diversity tended to depict either only one or none of these contrasts. Rao’s Q behaved similarly as species diversity and evenness. NTI and NRI showed a similar pattern among each other but, were different to all the other measures. Functional Divergence also behaved idiosyncratically across the 28 moth communities. The community weighted means of nearly all individual functional traits showed significant ecological patterns, supporting the relevance of the selected traits in shaping assemblage compositions. CONCLUSIONS: Species diversity and evenness measures turned out to be the most powerful metrics and clearly reflected both investigated environmental contrasts. This poses the question when it is useful to compile the additional data necessary for the calculation of additional diversity measures, since assembling trait bases and community phylogenies often requires a high work load. Apart from these methodological issues, most of the diversity measures related to communities of terrestrial insects like moths increased in forests that still are subject to flooding dynamics. This emphasizes the high conservation value of riparian forests and the importance of keeping and restoring river dynamics as a means of fostering also terrestrial biodiversity in floodplain areas.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7211340
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72113402020-05-14 The trinity of ecological contrasts: a case study on rich insect assemblages by means of species, functional and phylogenetic diversity measures Guariento, Elia Strutzenberger, Patrick Truxa, Christine Fiedler, Konrad BMC Ecol Research Article BACKGROUND: The ‘classical’ concept of species diversity was extended in the last decades into other dimensions focusing on the functional and phylogenetic diversity of communities. These measures are often argued to allow a deeper understanding of the mechanisms shaping community assembly along environmental gradients. Because of practical impediments, thus far only very few studies evaluated the performance of these diversity measures on large empirical data sets. Here, data on species-rich riparian moth communities under different flood regimes and from three different rivers has been used to compare the power of various diversity measures to uncover ecological contrasts. RESULTS: Contrary to the expectation, classical metrics of species diversity (Hill numbers N1, N2 and N(inf)) and evenness (Buzas-Gibson’s E and Pielous’s J) turned out to be the most powerful measures in unravelling the two gradients investigated in this study (e.g. flood regime and region). Several measures of functional and phylogenetic diversity tended to depict either only one or none of these contrasts. Rao’s Q behaved similarly as species diversity and evenness. NTI and NRI showed a similar pattern among each other but, were different to all the other measures. Functional Divergence also behaved idiosyncratically across the 28 moth communities. The community weighted means of nearly all individual functional traits showed significant ecological patterns, supporting the relevance of the selected traits in shaping assemblage compositions. CONCLUSIONS: Species diversity and evenness measures turned out to be the most powerful metrics and clearly reflected both investigated environmental contrasts. This poses the question when it is useful to compile the additional data necessary for the calculation of additional diversity measures, since assembling trait bases and community phylogenies often requires a high work load. Apart from these methodological issues, most of the diversity measures related to communities of terrestrial insects like moths increased in forests that still are subject to flooding dynamics. This emphasizes the high conservation value of riparian forests and the importance of keeping and restoring river dynamics as a means of fostering also terrestrial biodiversity in floodplain areas. BioMed Central 2020-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7211340/ /pubmed/32389122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12898-020-00298-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Guariento, Elia
Strutzenberger, Patrick
Truxa, Christine
Fiedler, Konrad
The trinity of ecological contrasts: a case study on rich insect assemblages by means of species, functional and phylogenetic diversity measures
title The trinity of ecological contrasts: a case study on rich insect assemblages by means of species, functional and phylogenetic diversity measures
title_full The trinity of ecological contrasts: a case study on rich insect assemblages by means of species, functional and phylogenetic diversity measures
title_fullStr The trinity of ecological contrasts: a case study on rich insect assemblages by means of species, functional and phylogenetic diversity measures
title_full_unstemmed The trinity of ecological contrasts: a case study on rich insect assemblages by means of species, functional and phylogenetic diversity measures
title_short The trinity of ecological contrasts: a case study on rich insect assemblages by means of species, functional and phylogenetic diversity measures
title_sort trinity of ecological contrasts: a case study on rich insect assemblages by means of species, functional and phylogenetic diversity measures
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7211340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32389122
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12898-020-00298-3
work_keys_str_mv AT guarientoelia thetrinityofecologicalcontrastsacasestudyonrichinsectassemblagesbymeansofspeciesfunctionalandphylogeneticdiversitymeasures
AT strutzenbergerpatrick thetrinityofecologicalcontrastsacasestudyonrichinsectassemblagesbymeansofspeciesfunctionalandphylogeneticdiversitymeasures
AT truxachristine thetrinityofecologicalcontrastsacasestudyonrichinsectassemblagesbymeansofspeciesfunctionalandphylogeneticdiversitymeasures
AT fiedlerkonrad thetrinityofecologicalcontrastsacasestudyonrichinsectassemblagesbymeansofspeciesfunctionalandphylogeneticdiversitymeasures
AT guarientoelia trinityofecologicalcontrastsacasestudyonrichinsectassemblagesbymeansofspeciesfunctionalandphylogeneticdiversitymeasures
AT strutzenbergerpatrick trinityofecologicalcontrastsacasestudyonrichinsectassemblagesbymeansofspeciesfunctionalandphylogeneticdiversitymeasures
AT truxachristine trinityofecologicalcontrastsacasestudyonrichinsectassemblagesbymeansofspeciesfunctionalandphylogeneticdiversitymeasures
AT fiedlerkonrad trinityofecologicalcontrastsacasestudyonrichinsectassemblagesbymeansofspeciesfunctionalandphylogeneticdiversitymeasures