Cargando…

Assessing osseointegration of metallic implants with boronized surface treatment

BACKGROUND: Modification of endosteal implants through surface treatments have been investigated to improve osseointegration. Boronization has demonstrated favorable mechanical properties, but limited studies have assessed translational, in vivo outcomes. This study investigated the effect of implan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Witek, Lukasz, Tovar, Nick, Lopez, Christopher D., Morcos, Jonathan, Bowers, Michelle, Petrova, Roumiana S., Coelho, Paulo G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7211368/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32271322
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.23175
_version_ 1783531443287228416
author Witek, Lukasz
Tovar, Nick
Lopez, Christopher D.
Morcos, Jonathan
Bowers, Michelle
Petrova, Roumiana S.
Coelho, Paulo G.
author_facet Witek, Lukasz
Tovar, Nick
Lopez, Christopher D.
Morcos, Jonathan
Bowers, Michelle
Petrova, Roumiana S.
Coelho, Paulo G.
author_sort Witek, Lukasz
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Modification of endosteal implants through surface treatments have been investigated to improve osseointegration. Boronization has demonstrated favorable mechanical properties, but limited studies have assessed translational, in vivo outcomes. This study investigated the effect of implant surface boronization on bone healing. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two implant surface roughness profiles (acid etched, machined) in CP titanium (type II) alloy implants were boronized by solid-state diffusion until 10-15µm boron coating was achieved. The surface-treated implants were placed bilaterally into 5 adult sheep ilia for three and six weeks. Four implant groups were tested: boronized machined (BM), boronized acid-etched (BAA), control machined (CM), and control acid-etched (CAA). Osseointegration was quantified by calculating bone to implant contact (BIC) and bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO). RESULTS: Both implant types treated with boronization had BIC values not statistically different from machined control implants at t=3 weeks, and significantly less than acid-etched control (p<0.02). BAFO values were not statistically different for all 3-week groups except machined control (significantly less at p<0.02). BAFO had a significant downward trend from 3 to 6 weeks in both boronized implant types (p<0.03) while both control implant types had significant increases in BIC and BAFO from 3 to 6 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Non-decalcified histology depicted intramembranous-like healing/remodeling in bone for controls, but an absence of this dynamic process in bone for boronized implants. These findings are inconsistent with in vitro work describing bone regenerative properties of elemental Boron and suggests that effects of boron on in vivo bone healing warrant further investigation. Key words:Boronization, acid-etched, machined, implants, osseointegration, in vivo, solid-state diffusion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7211368
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72113682020-05-14 Assessing osseointegration of metallic implants with boronized surface treatment Witek, Lukasz Tovar, Nick Lopez, Christopher D. Morcos, Jonathan Bowers, Michelle Petrova, Roumiana S. Coelho, Paulo G. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal Research BACKGROUND: Modification of endosteal implants through surface treatments have been investigated to improve osseointegration. Boronization has demonstrated favorable mechanical properties, but limited studies have assessed translational, in vivo outcomes. This study investigated the effect of implant surface boronization on bone healing. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two implant surface roughness profiles (acid etched, machined) in CP titanium (type II) alloy implants were boronized by solid-state diffusion until 10-15µm boron coating was achieved. The surface-treated implants were placed bilaterally into 5 adult sheep ilia for three and six weeks. Four implant groups were tested: boronized machined (BM), boronized acid-etched (BAA), control machined (CM), and control acid-etched (CAA). Osseointegration was quantified by calculating bone to implant contact (BIC) and bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO). RESULTS: Both implant types treated with boronization had BIC values not statistically different from machined control implants at t=3 weeks, and significantly less than acid-etched control (p<0.02). BAFO values were not statistically different for all 3-week groups except machined control (significantly less at p<0.02). BAFO had a significant downward trend from 3 to 6 weeks in both boronized implant types (p<0.03) while both control implant types had significant increases in BIC and BAFO from 3 to 6 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Non-decalcified histology depicted intramembranous-like healing/remodeling in bone for controls, but an absence of this dynamic process in bone for boronized implants. These findings are inconsistent with in vitro work describing bone regenerative properties of elemental Boron and suggests that effects of boron on in vivo bone healing warrant further investigation. Key words:Boronization, acid-etched, machined, implants, osseointegration, in vivo, solid-state diffusion. Medicina Oral S.L. 2020-05 2020-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7211368/ /pubmed/32271322 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.23175 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Witek, Lukasz
Tovar, Nick
Lopez, Christopher D.
Morcos, Jonathan
Bowers, Michelle
Petrova, Roumiana S.
Coelho, Paulo G.
Assessing osseointegration of metallic implants with boronized surface treatment
title Assessing osseointegration of metallic implants with boronized surface treatment
title_full Assessing osseointegration of metallic implants with boronized surface treatment
title_fullStr Assessing osseointegration of metallic implants with boronized surface treatment
title_full_unstemmed Assessing osseointegration of metallic implants with boronized surface treatment
title_short Assessing osseointegration of metallic implants with boronized surface treatment
title_sort assessing osseointegration of metallic implants with boronized surface treatment
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7211368/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32271322
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.23175
work_keys_str_mv AT witeklukasz assessingosseointegrationofmetallicimplantswithboronizedsurfacetreatment
AT tovarnick assessingosseointegrationofmetallicimplantswithboronizedsurfacetreatment
AT lopezchristopherd assessingosseointegrationofmetallicimplantswithboronizedsurfacetreatment
AT morcosjonathan assessingosseointegrationofmetallicimplantswithboronizedsurfacetreatment
AT bowersmichelle assessingosseointegrationofmetallicimplantswithboronizedsurfacetreatment
AT petrovaroumianas assessingosseointegrationofmetallicimplantswithboronizedsurfacetreatment
AT coelhopaulog assessingosseointegrationofmetallicimplantswithboronizedsurfacetreatment