Cargando…
Assessing osseointegration of metallic implants with boronized surface treatment
BACKGROUND: Modification of endosteal implants through surface treatments have been investigated to improve osseointegration. Boronization has demonstrated favorable mechanical properties, but limited studies have assessed translational, in vivo outcomes. This study investigated the effect of implan...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medicina Oral S.L.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7211368/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32271322 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.23175 |
_version_ | 1783531443287228416 |
---|---|
author | Witek, Lukasz Tovar, Nick Lopez, Christopher D. Morcos, Jonathan Bowers, Michelle Petrova, Roumiana S. Coelho, Paulo G. |
author_facet | Witek, Lukasz Tovar, Nick Lopez, Christopher D. Morcos, Jonathan Bowers, Michelle Petrova, Roumiana S. Coelho, Paulo G. |
author_sort | Witek, Lukasz |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Modification of endosteal implants through surface treatments have been investigated to improve osseointegration. Boronization has demonstrated favorable mechanical properties, but limited studies have assessed translational, in vivo outcomes. This study investigated the effect of implant surface boronization on bone healing. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two implant surface roughness profiles (acid etched, machined) in CP titanium (type II) alloy implants were boronized by solid-state diffusion until 10-15µm boron coating was achieved. The surface-treated implants were placed bilaterally into 5 adult sheep ilia for three and six weeks. Four implant groups were tested: boronized machined (BM), boronized acid-etched (BAA), control machined (CM), and control acid-etched (CAA). Osseointegration was quantified by calculating bone to implant contact (BIC) and bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO). RESULTS: Both implant types treated with boronization had BIC values not statistically different from machined control implants at t=3 weeks, and significantly less than acid-etched control (p<0.02). BAFO values were not statistically different for all 3-week groups except machined control (significantly less at p<0.02). BAFO had a significant downward trend from 3 to 6 weeks in both boronized implant types (p<0.03) while both control implant types had significant increases in BIC and BAFO from 3 to 6 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Non-decalcified histology depicted intramembranous-like healing/remodeling in bone for controls, but an absence of this dynamic process in bone for boronized implants. These findings are inconsistent with in vitro work describing bone regenerative properties of elemental Boron and suggests that effects of boron on in vivo bone healing warrant further investigation. Key words:Boronization, acid-etched, machined, implants, osseointegration, in vivo, solid-state diffusion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7211368 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Medicina Oral S.L. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72113682020-05-14 Assessing osseointegration of metallic implants with boronized surface treatment Witek, Lukasz Tovar, Nick Lopez, Christopher D. Morcos, Jonathan Bowers, Michelle Petrova, Roumiana S. Coelho, Paulo G. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal Research BACKGROUND: Modification of endosteal implants through surface treatments have been investigated to improve osseointegration. Boronization has demonstrated favorable mechanical properties, but limited studies have assessed translational, in vivo outcomes. This study investigated the effect of implant surface boronization on bone healing. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two implant surface roughness profiles (acid etched, machined) in CP titanium (type II) alloy implants were boronized by solid-state diffusion until 10-15µm boron coating was achieved. The surface-treated implants were placed bilaterally into 5 adult sheep ilia for three and six weeks. Four implant groups were tested: boronized machined (BM), boronized acid-etched (BAA), control machined (CM), and control acid-etched (CAA). Osseointegration was quantified by calculating bone to implant contact (BIC) and bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO). RESULTS: Both implant types treated with boronization had BIC values not statistically different from machined control implants at t=3 weeks, and significantly less than acid-etched control (p<0.02). BAFO values were not statistically different for all 3-week groups except machined control (significantly less at p<0.02). BAFO had a significant downward trend from 3 to 6 weeks in both boronized implant types (p<0.03) while both control implant types had significant increases in BIC and BAFO from 3 to 6 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Non-decalcified histology depicted intramembranous-like healing/remodeling in bone for controls, but an absence of this dynamic process in bone for boronized implants. These findings are inconsistent with in vitro work describing bone regenerative properties of elemental Boron and suggests that effects of boron on in vivo bone healing warrant further investigation. Key words:Boronization, acid-etched, machined, implants, osseointegration, in vivo, solid-state diffusion. Medicina Oral S.L. 2020-05 2020-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7211368/ /pubmed/32271322 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.23175 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Witek, Lukasz Tovar, Nick Lopez, Christopher D. Morcos, Jonathan Bowers, Michelle Petrova, Roumiana S. Coelho, Paulo G. Assessing osseointegration of metallic implants with boronized surface treatment |
title | Assessing osseointegration of metallic implants with boronized surface treatment |
title_full | Assessing osseointegration of metallic implants with boronized surface treatment |
title_fullStr | Assessing osseointegration of metallic implants with boronized surface treatment |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing osseointegration of metallic implants with boronized surface treatment |
title_short | Assessing osseointegration of metallic implants with boronized surface treatment |
title_sort | assessing osseointegration of metallic implants with boronized surface treatment |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7211368/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32271322 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.23175 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT witeklukasz assessingosseointegrationofmetallicimplantswithboronizedsurfacetreatment AT tovarnick assessingosseointegrationofmetallicimplantswithboronizedsurfacetreatment AT lopezchristopherd assessingosseointegrationofmetallicimplantswithboronizedsurfacetreatment AT morcosjonathan assessingosseointegrationofmetallicimplantswithboronizedsurfacetreatment AT bowersmichelle assessingosseointegrationofmetallicimplantswithboronizedsurfacetreatment AT petrovaroumianas assessingosseointegrationofmetallicimplantswithboronizedsurfacetreatment AT coelhopaulog assessingosseointegrationofmetallicimplantswithboronizedsurfacetreatment |