Cargando…
Crowds in front of bottlenecks at entrances from the perspective of physics and social psychology
This article presents an interdisciplinary study of physical and social psychological effects on crowd dynamics based on a series of bottleneck experiments. Bottlenecks are of particular interest for applications such as crowd management and design of emergency routes because they limit the performa...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7211470/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32343932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2019.0871 |
_version_ | 1783531456939687936 |
---|---|
author | Adrian, Juliane Seyfried, Armin Sieben, Anna |
author_facet | Adrian, Juliane Seyfried, Armin Sieben, Anna |
author_sort | Adrian, Juliane |
collection | PubMed |
description | This article presents an interdisciplinary study of physical and social psychological effects on crowd dynamics based on a series of bottleneck experiments. Bottlenecks are of particular interest for applications such as crowd management and design of emergency routes because they limit the performance of a facility. In addition to previous work on the dynamics within the bottleneck, this study focuses on the dynamics in front of the bottleneck, more specifically, at entrances. The experimental set-up simulates an entrance scenario to a concert consisting of an entrance gate (serving as bottleneck) and a corridor formed by barriers. The parameters examined are the corridor width, degree of motivation and priming of the social norm of queuing. The analysis is based on head trajectories and questionnaires. We show that the density of persons per square metre depends on motivation and also increases continuously with increasing corridor width, meaning that a density reduction can be achieved by a reduction of space. In comparison to other corridor widths observed, the narrowest corridor is rated as being fairer, more comfortable and as showing less unfair behaviour. Pushing behaviour is seen as ambivalent: it is rated as unfair and listed as a strategy for faster access. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7211470 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72114702020-05-14 Crowds in front of bottlenecks at entrances from the perspective of physics and social psychology Adrian, Juliane Seyfried, Armin Sieben, Anna J R Soc Interface Life Sciences–Physics interface This article presents an interdisciplinary study of physical and social psychological effects on crowd dynamics based on a series of bottleneck experiments. Bottlenecks are of particular interest for applications such as crowd management and design of emergency routes because they limit the performance of a facility. In addition to previous work on the dynamics within the bottleneck, this study focuses on the dynamics in front of the bottleneck, more specifically, at entrances. The experimental set-up simulates an entrance scenario to a concert consisting of an entrance gate (serving as bottleneck) and a corridor formed by barriers. The parameters examined are the corridor width, degree of motivation and priming of the social norm of queuing. The analysis is based on head trajectories and questionnaires. We show that the density of persons per square metre depends on motivation and also increases continuously with increasing corridor width, meaning that a density reduction can be achieved by a reduction of space. In comparison to other corridor widths observed, the narrowest corridor is rated as being fairer, more comfortable and as showing less unfair behaviour. Pushing behaviour is seen as ambivalent: it is rated as unfair and listed as a strategy for faster access. The Royal Society 2020-04 2020-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7211470/ /pubmed/32343932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2019.0871 Text en © 2020 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Life Sciences–Physics interface Adrian, Juliane Seyfried, Armin Sieben, Anna Crowds in front of bottlenecks at entrances from the perspective of physics and social psychology |
title | Crowds in front of bottlenecks at entrances from the perspective of physics and social psychology |
title_full | Crowds in front of bottlenecks at entrances from the perspective of physics and social psychology |
title_fullStr | Crowds in front of bottlenecks at entrances from the perspective of physics and social psychology |
title_full_unstemmed | Crowds in front of bottlenecks at entrances from the perspective of physics and social psychology |
title_short | Crowds in front of bottlenecks at entrances from the perspective of physics and social psychology |
title_sort | crowds in front of bottlenecks at entrances from the perspective of physics and social psychology |
topic | Life Sciences–Physics interface |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7211470/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32343932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2019.0871 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT adrianjuliane crowdsinfrontofbottlenecksatentrancesfromtheperspectiveofphysicsandsocialpsychology AT seyfriedarmin crowdsinfrontofbottlenecksatentrancesfromtheperspectiveofphysicsandsocialpsychology AT siebenanna crowdsinfrontofbottlenecksatentrancesfromtheperspectiveofphysicsandsocialpsychology |