Cargando…

Crowds in front of bottlenecks at entrances from the perspective of physics and social psychology

This article presents an interdisciplinary study of physical and social psychological effects on crowd dynamics based on a series of bottleneck experiments. Bottlenecks are of particular interest for applications such as crowd management and design of emergency routes because they limit the performa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adrian, Juliane, Seyfried, Armin, Sieben, Anna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7211470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32343932
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2019.0871
_version_ 1783531456939687936
author Adrian, Juliane
Seyfried, Armin
Sieben, Anna
author_facet Adrian, Juliane
Seyfried, Armin
Sieben, Anna
author_sort Adrian, Juliane
collection PubMed
description This article presents an interdisciplinary study of physical and social psychological effects on crowd dynamics based on a series of bottleneck experiments. Bottlenecks are of particular interest for applications such as crowd management and design of emergency routes because they limit the performance of a facility. In addition to previous work on the dynamics within the bottleneck, this study focuses on the dynamics in front of the bottleneck, more specifically, at entrances. The experimental set-up simulates an entrance scenario to a concert consisting of an entrance gate (serving as bottleneck) and a corridor formed by barriers. The parameters examined are the corridor width, degree of motivation and priming of the social norm of queuing. The analysis is based on head trajectories and questionnaires. We show that the density of persons per square metre depends on motivation and also increases continuously with increasing corridor width, meaning that a density reduction can be achieved by a reduction of space. In comparison to other corridor widths observed, the narrowest corridor is rated as being fairer, more comfortable and as showing less unfair behaviour. Pushing behaviour is seen as ambivalent: it is rated as unfair and listed as a strategy for faster access.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7211470
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72114702020-05-14 Crowds in front of bottlenecks at entrances from the perspective of physics and social psychology Adrian, Juliane Seyfried, Armin Sieben, Anna J R Soc Interface Life Sciences–Physics interface This article presents an interdisciplinary study of physical and social psychological effects on crowd dynamics based on a series of bottleneck experiments. Bottlenecks are of particular interest for applications such as crowd management and design of emergency routes because they limit the performance of a facility. In addition to previous work on the dynamics within the bottleneck, this study focuses on the dynamics in front of the bottleneck, more specifically, at entrances. The experimental set-up simulates an entrance scenario to a concert consisting of an entrance gate (serving as bottleneck) and a corridor formed by barriers. The parameters examined are the corridor width, degree of motivation and priming of the social norm of queuing. The analysis is based on head trajectories and questionnaires. We show that the density of persons per square metre depends on motivation and also increases continuously with increasing corridor width, meaning that a density reduction can be achieved by a reduction of space. In comparison to other corridor widths observed, the narrowest corridor is rated as being fairer, more comfortable and as showing less unfair behaviour. Pushing behaviour is seen as ambivalent: it is rated as unfair and listed as a strategy for faster access. The Royal Society 2020-04 2020-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7211470/ /pubmed/32343932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2019.0871 Text en © 2020 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Life Sciences–Physics interface
Adrian, Juliane
Seyfried, Armin
Sieben, Anna
Crowds in front of bottlenecks at entrances from the perspective of physics and social psychology
title Crowds in front of bottlenecks at entrances from the perspective of physics and social psychology
title_full Crowds in front of bottlenecks at entrances from the perspective of physics and social psychology
title_fullStr Crowds in front of bottlenecks at entrances from the perspective of physics and social psychology
title_full_unstemmed Crowds in front of bottlenecks at entrances from the perspective of physics and social psychology
title_short Crowds in front of bottlenecks at entrances from the perspective of physics and social psychology
title_sort crowds in front of bottlenecks at entrances from the perspective of physics and social psychology
topic Life Sciences–Physics interface
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7211470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32343932
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2019.0871
work_keys_str_mv AT adrianjuliane crowdsinfrontofbottlenecksatentrancesfromtheperspectiveofphysicsandsocialpsychology
AT seyfriedarmin crowdsinfrontofbottlenecksatentrancesfromtheperspectiveofphysicsandsocialpsychology
AT siebenanna crowdsinfrontofbottlenecksatentrancesfromtheperspectiveofphysicsandsocialpsychology