Cargando…

Spontaneous ventilation versus mechanical ventilation during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for spontaneous pneumothorax: a study protocol for multicenter randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: With the evolution and adoption of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), options for anesthesia control have also seen major developments. Intubated anesthesia with single lung mechanical ventilation VATS (MV-VATS) is considered the standard of care in VATS. However, this type of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cui, Fei, Xu, Ke, Liang, Hengrui, Liang, Wenhua, Li, Jingpei, Wang, Wei, Liu, Hui, Liu, Jun, He, Jianxing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7212161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32395294
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2020.02.13
_version_ 1783531566236958720
author Cui, Fei
Xu, Ke
Liang, Hengrui
Liang, Wenhua
Li, Jingpei
Wang, Wei
Liu, Hui
Liu, Jun
He, Jianxing
author_facet Cui, Fei
Xu, Ke
Liang, Hengrui
Liang, Wenhua
Li, Jingpei
Wang, Wei
Liu, Hui
Liu, Jun
He, Jianxing
author_sort Cui, Fei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: With the evolution and adoption of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), options for anesthesia control have also seen major developments. Intubated anesthesia with single lung mechanical ventilation VATS (MV-VATS) is considered the standard of care in VATS. However, this type of ventilation strategy has been associated with several adverse effects, which can trigger complications and increase the overall surgical risk. In order to avoid intubated anesthesia related adverse effects, non-intubated spontaneous ventilation VATS (SV-VATS) strategies have been proposed in recent years and widely applied. METHODS: We established a two-arm parallel multicenter randomized controlled trial for comparative analysis of the outcomes of patients undergoing either SV-VATS or MV-VATS for spontaneous pneumothorax. Outcomes of interest include safety during operation, total analgesic dose, recovery time, postoperative complication rates, postoperative pain score, length of hospitalization, inflammation index, medical cost, etc. The recruitment target is 316 patients. Patients will be eligible if their chest CT is diagnosed with “localized lung bullae” and need VATS resection. Patients will be randomized into the SV-VATS (test group) or MV-VATS (control group) after signing informed consent and surgical anesthesia evaluation. DISCUSSION: This protocol has been approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical university. Results will be presented at national and international meetings and conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals. We will also disseminate the main results to all participants in a letter. Non-intubated SV-VATS offered a more individual choice of anesthetics and surgical method for spontaneous pneumothorax patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03016858; pre-results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7212161
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72121612020-05-11 Spontaneous ventilation versus mechanical ventilation during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for spontaneous pneumothorax: a study protocol for multicenter randomized controlled trial Cui, Fei Xu, Ke Liang, Hengrui Liang, Wenhua Li, Jingpei Wang, Wei Liu, Hui Liu, Jun He, Jianxing J Thorac Dis Study Protocol BACKGROUND: With the evolution and adoption of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), options for anesthesia control have also seen major developments. Intubated anesthesia with single lung mechanical ventilation VATS (MV-VATS) is considered the standard of care in VATS. However, this type of ventilation strategy has been associated with several adverse effects, which can trigger complications and increase the overall surgical risk. In order to avoid intubated anesthesia related adverse effects, non-intubated spontaneous ventilation VATS (SV-VATS) strategies have been proposed in recent years and widely applied. METHODS: We established a two-arm parallel multicenter randomized controlled trial for comparative analysis of the outcomes of patients undergoing either SV-VATS or MV-VATS for spontaneous pneumothorax. Outcomes of interest include safety during operation, total analgesic dose, recovery time, postoperative complication rates, postoperative pain score, length of hospitalization, inflammation index, medical cost, etc. The recruitment target is 316 patients. Patients will be eligible if their chest CT is diagnosed with “localized lung bullae” and need VATS resection. Patients will be randomized into the SV-VATS (test group) or MV-VATS (control group) after signing informed consent and surgical anesthesia evaluation. DISCUSSION: This protocol has been approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical university. Results will be presented at national and international meetings and conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals. We will also disseminate the main results to all participants in a letter. Non-intubated SV-VATS offered a more individual choice of anesthetics and surgical method for spontaneous pneumothorax patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03016858; pre-results. AME Publishing Company 2020-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7212161/ /pubmed/32395294 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2020.02.13 Text en 2020 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Cui, Fei
Xu, Ke
Liang, Hengrui
Liang, Wenhua
Li, Jingpei
Wang, Wei
Liu, Hui
Liu, Jun
He, Jianxing
Spontaneous ventilation versus mechanical ventilation during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for spontaneous pneumothorax: a study protocol for multicenter randomized controlled trial
title Spontaneous ventilation versus mechanical ventilation during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for spontaneous pneumothorax: a study protocol for multicenter randomized controlled trial
title_full Spontaneous ventilation versus mechanical ventilation during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for spontaneous pneumothorax: a study protocol for multicenter randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Spontaneous ventilation versus mechanical ventilation during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for spontaneous pneumothorax: a study protocol for multicenter randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Spontaneous ventilation versus mechanical ventilation during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for spontaneous pneumothorax: a study protocol for multicenter randomized controlled trial
title_short Spontaneous ventilation versus mechanical ventilation during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for spontaneous pneumothorax: a study protocol for multicenter randomized controlled trial
title_sort spontaneous ventilation versus mechanical ventilation during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for spontaneous pneumothorax: a study protocol for multicenter randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7212161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32395294
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2020.02.13
work_keys_str_mv AT cuifei spontaneousventilationversusmechanicalventilationduringvideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryforspontaneouspneumothoraxastudyprotocolformulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT xuke spontaneousventilationversusmechanicalventilationduringvideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryforspontaneouspneumothoraxastudyprotocolformulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lianghengrui spontaneousventilationversusmechanicalventilationduringvideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryforspontaneouspneumothoraxastudyprotocolformulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT liangwenhua spontaneousventilationversusmechanicalventilationduringvideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryforspontaneouspneumothoraxastudyprotocolformulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lijingpei spontaneousventilationversusmechanicalventilationduringvideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryforspontaneouspneumothoraxastudyprotocolformulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wangwei spontaneousventilationversusmechanicalventilationduringvideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryforspontaneouspneumothoraxastudyprotocolformulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT liuhui spontaneousventilationversusmechanicalventilationduringvideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryforspontaneouspneumothoraxastudyprotocolformulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT liujun spontaneousventilationversusmechanicalventilationduringvideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryforspontaneouspneumothoraxastudyprotocolformulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hejianxing spontaneousventilationversusmechanicalventilationduringvideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryforspontaneouspneumothoraxastudyprotocolformulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial