Cargando…

Peptide-based formula versus standard-based polymeric formula for critically ill children: is it superior for patients’ tolerance?

INTRODUCTION: Malnutrition affects 50% of hospitalized children and 25–70% of critically ill children. Enteral tube feeding is generally considered the preferred modality for critically ill pediatric patients. Clinical advantages of using peptide-based formulas are still controversial in critically...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ibrahim, Hanan, Mansour, Mervat, El Gendy, Yasmin Gamal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7212209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32399107
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2020.94157
_version_ 1783531576345231360
author Ibrahim, Hanan
Mansour, Mervat
El Gendy, Yasmin Gamal
author_facet Ibrahim, Hanan
Mansour, Mervat
El Gendy, Yasmin Gamal
author_sort Ibrahim, Hanan
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Malnutrition affects 50% of hospitalized children and 25–70% of critically ill children. Enteral tube feeding is generally considered the preferred modality for critically ill pediatric patients. Clinical advantages of using peptide-based formulas are still controversial in critically ill children. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of a peptide-based formula versus a standard polymeric formula on feeding tolerance and whether this will affect the outcome among critically ill children. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This single blind case control study was conducted on 180 randomly selected critically ill children in the pediatric critical care unit (PICU) of Ain Shams University. Patients were divided into 2 groups: a group receiving a standard polymeric formula (group 1; 90 patients) and a group receiving a peptide-based formula (group II; 90 patients). Nutritional requirements, days to reach full enteral feeding, feeding intolerance symptoms and anthropometric measurements were recorded for all patients at admission together with their pediatric risk of mortality score (PRISM). Length of PICU stay, occurrence of sepsis together with survival were analyzed at discharge as outcome measures. RESULTS: Patients receiving a peptide-based formula showed a significant decrease in feeding interruptions and abdominal distention (p < 0.000), reached full enteral feeding faster (2.60 ±0.74 days versus 5.36 ±1.00 days in patients received polymeric standard formula; p < 0.001) and improved weight gain (p < 0.028). Moreover, duration of sepsis was significantly shorter (p < 0.045), but no difference in mortality was recorded between patient groups. CONCLUSIONS: Peptide-based formula feeding was better tolerated than standard polymeric formula feeding in critically ill pediatric patients. However, the choice of patients receiving the peptide-based formula needs to be further evaluated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7212209
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72122092020-05-12 Peptide-based formula versus standard-based polymeric formula for critically ill children: is it superior for patients’ tolerance? Ibrahim, Hanan Mansour, Mervat El Gendy, Yasmin Gamal Arch Med Sci Clinical Research INTRODUCTION: Malnutrition affects 50% of hospitalized children and 25–70% of critically ill children. Enteral tube feeding is generally considered the preferred modality for critically ill pediatric patients. Clinical advantages of using peptide-based formulas are still controversial in critically ill children. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of a peptide-based formula versus a standard polymeric formula on feeding tolerance and whether this will affect the outcome among critically ill children. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This single blind case control study was conducted on 180 randomly selected critically ill children in the pediatric critical care unit (PICU) of Ain Shams University. Patients were divided into 2 groups: a group receiving a standard polymeric formula (group 1; 90 patients) and a group receiving a peptide-based formula (group II; 90 patients). Nutritional requirements, days to reach full enteral feeding, feeding intolerance symptoms and anthropometric measurements were recorded for all patients at admission together with their pediatric risk of mortality score (PRISM). Length of PICU stay, occurrence of sepsis together with survival were analyzed at discharge as outcome measures. RESULTS: Patients receiving a peptide-based formula showed a significant decrease in feeding interruptions and abdominal distention (p < 0.000), reached full enteral feeding faster (2.60 ±0.74 days versus 5.36 ±1.00 days in patients received polymeric standard formula; p < 0.001) and improved weight gain (p < 0.028). Moreover, duration of sepsis was significantly shorter (p < 0.045), but no difference in mortality was recorded between patient groups. CONCLUSIONS: Peptide-based formula feeding was better tolerated than standard polymeric formula feeding in critically ill pediatric patients. However, the choice of patients receiving the peptide-based formula needs to be further evaluated. Termedia Publishing House 2020-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7212209/ /pubmed/32399107 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2020.94157 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Termedia & Banach http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Ibrahim, Hanan
Mansour, Mervat
El Gendy, Yasmin Gamal
Peptide-based formula versus standard-based polymeric formula for critically ill children: is it superior for patients’ tolerance?
title Peptide-based formula versus standard-based polymeric formula for critically ill children: is it superior for patients’ tolerance?
title_full Peptide-based formula versus standard-based polymeric formula for critically ill children: is it superior for patients’ tolerance?
title_fullStr Peptide-based formula versus standard-based polymeric formula for critically ill children: is it superior for patients’ tolerance?
title_full_unstemmed Peptide-based formula versus standard-based polymeric formula for critically ill children: is it superior for patients’ tolerance?
title_short Peptide-based formula versus standard-based polymeric formula for critically ill children: is it superior for patients’ tolerance?
title_sort peptide-based formula versus standard-based polymeric formula for critically ill children: is it superior for patients’ tolerance?
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7212209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32399107
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2020.94157
work_keys_str_mv AT ibrahimhanan peptidebasedformulaversusstandardbasedpolymericformulaforcriticallyillchildrenisitsuperiorforpatientstolerance
AT mansourmervat peptidebasedformulaversusstandardbasedpolymericformulaforcriticallyillchildrenisitsuperiorforpatientstolerance
AT elgendyyasmingamal peptidebasedformulaversusstandardbasedpolymericformulaforcriticallyillchildrenisitsuperiorforpatientstolerance