Cargando…
Peptide-based formula versus standard-based polymeric formula for critically ill children: is it superior for patients’ tolerance?
INTRODUCTION: Malnutrition affects 50% of hospitalized children and 25–70% of critically ill children. Enteral tube feeding is generally considered the preferred modality for critically ill pediatric patients. Clinical advantages of using peptide-based formulas are still controversial in critically...
Autores principales: | Ibrahim, Hanan, Mansour, Mervat, El Gendy, Yasmin Gamal |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Termedia Publishing House
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7212209/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32399107 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2020.94157 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Small peptide formulas versus standard polymeric formulas in critically ill patients with acute gastrointestinal injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Wang, Youquan, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Gastrointestinal Tolerance and Protein Absorption Markers with a New Peptide Enteral Formula Compared to a Standard Intact Protein Enteral Formula in Critically Ill Patients
por: de Brito-Ashurst, Ione, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Peptide-based enteral formula improves tolerance and clinical outcomes in abdominal surgery patients relative to a whole protein enteral formula
por: Liu, Ming-Yi, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Diabetes-Specific Formulae Versus Standard Formulae as Enteral Nutrition to Treat Hyperglycemia in Critically Ill Patients: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Feasibility Trial
por: Doola, Ra'eesa, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Tolerance of a standard intact protein formula versus a partially hydrolyzed formula in healthy, term infants
por: Berseth, Carol Lynn, et al.
Publicado: (2009)