Cargando…
Relevance of Somatosensory Evoked Potential Amplitude After Cardiac Arrest
Objective: We present relations of SSEP amplitude with neurological outcome and of SSEP amplitude with EEG amplitude in comatose patients after cardiac arrest. Methods: This is a post hoc analysis of a prospective cohort study in comatose patients after cardiac arrest. Amplitude of SSEP recordings o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7212397/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32425878 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00335 |
_version_ | 1783531613153394688 |
---|---|
author | Glimmerveen, Astrid B. Keijzer, Hanneke M. Ruijter, Barry J. Tjepkema-Cloostermans, Marleen C. van Putten, Michel J. A. M. Hofmeijer, Jeannette |
author_facet | Glimmerveen, Astrid B. Keijzer, Hanneke M. Ruijter, Barry J. Tjepkema-Cloostermans, Marleen C. van Putten, Michel J. A. M. Hofmeijer, Jeannette |
author_sort | Glimmerveen, Astrid B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: We present relations of SSEP amplitude with neurological outcome and of SSEP amplitude with EEG amplitude in comatose patients after cardiac arrest. Methods: This is a post hoc analysis of a prospective cohort study in comatose patients after cardiac arrest. Amplitude of SSEP recordings obtained within 48–72 h, and EEG patterns obtained at 12 and 24h after cardiac arrest were related to good (CPC 1-2) or poor (CPC 3-5) outcome at 6 months. In 39% of the study population multiple SSEP measurements were performed. Additionally, SSEP amplitude was related to mean EEG amplitude. Results: We included 138 patients (77% poor outcome). Absent SSEP responses, a N20 amplitude <0.4 μV within 48–72 h, and suppressed or synchronous EEG with suppressed background at 12 or 24 h after cardiac arrest were invariably associated with a poor outcome. Combined, these tests reached a sensitivity for prediction of poor outcome up to 58 at 100% specificity. N20 amplitude increased with a mean of 0.55 μV per day in patients with a poor outcome, and remained stable with a good outcome. There was no statistically significant correlation between SSEP and EEG amplitudes in 182 combined SSEP and EEG measurements (R(2) < 0.01). Conclusions: N20 amplitude <0.4 μV is invariably associated with poor outcome. There is no correlation between SSEP and EEG amplitude. Significance: SSEP amplitude analysis may contribute to outcome prediction after cardiac arrest. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7212397 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72123972020-05-18 Relevance of Somatosensory Evoked Potential Amplitude After Cardiac Arrest Glimmerveen, Astrid B. Keijzer, Hanneke M. Ruijter, Barry J. Tjepkema-Cloostermans, Marleen C. van Putten, Michel J. A. M. Hofmeijer, Jeannette Front Neurol Neurology Objective: We present relations of SSEP amplitude with neurological outcome and of SSEP amplitude with EEG amplitude in comatose patients after cardiac arrest. Methods: This is a post hoc analysis of a prospective cohort study in comatose patients after cardiac arrest. Amplitude of SSEP recordings obtained within 48–72 h, and EEG patterns obtained at 12 and 24h after cardiac arrest were related to good (CPC 1-2) or poor (CPC 3-5) outcome at 6 months. In 39% of the study population multiple SSEP measurements were performed. Additionally, SSEP amplitude was related to mean EEG amplitude. Results: We included 138 patients (77% poor outcome). Absent SSEP responses, a N20 amplitude <0.4 μV within 48–72 h, and suppressed or synchronous EEG with suppressed background at 12 or 24 h after cardiac arrest were invariably associated with a poor outcome. Combined, these tests reached a sensitivity for prediction of poor outcome up to 58 at 100% specificity. N20 amplitude increased with a mean of 0.55 μV per day in patients with a poor outcome, and remained stable with a good outcome. There was no statistically significant correlation between SSEP and EEG amplitudes in 182 combined SSEP and EEG measurements (R(2) < 0.01). Conclusions: N20 amplitude <0.4 μV is invariably associated with poor outcome. There is no correlation between SSEP and EEG amplitude. Significance: SSEP amplitude analysis may contribute to outcome prediction after cardiac arrest. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7212397/ /pubmed/32425878 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00335 Text en Copyright © 2020 Glimmerveen, Keijzer, Ruijter, Tjepkema-Cloostermans, van Putten and Hofmeijer. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neurology Glimmerveen, Astrid B. Keijzer, Hanneke M. Ruijter, Barry J. Tjepkema-Cloostermans, Marleen C. van Putten, Michel J. A. M. Hofmeijer, Jeannette Relevance of Somatosensory Evoked Potential Amplitude After Cardiac Arrest |
title | Relevance of Somatosensory Evoked Potential Amplitude After Cardiac Arrest |
title_full | Relevance of Somatosensory Evoked Potential Amplitude After Cardiac Arrest |
title_fullStr | Relevance of Somatosensory Evoked Potential Amplitude After Cardiac Arrest |
title_full_unstemmed | Relevance of Somatosensory Evoked Potential Amplitude After Cardiac Arrest |
title_short | Relevance of Somatosensory Evoked Potential Amplitude After Cardiac Arrest |
title_sort | relevance of somatosensory evoked potential amplitude after cardiac arrest |
topic | Neurology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7212397/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32425878 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00335 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT glimmerveenastridb relevanceofsomatosensoryevokedpotentialamplitudeaftercardiacarrest AT keijzerhannekem relevanceofsomatosensoryevokedpotentialamplitudeaftercardiacarrest AT ruijterbarryj relevanceofsomatosensoryevokedpotentialamplitudeaftercardiacarrest AT tjepkemacloostermansmarleenc relevanceofsomatosensoryevokedpotentialamplitudeaftercardiacarrest AT vanputtenmicheljam relevanceofsomatosensoryevokedpotentialamplitudeaftercardiacarrest AT hofmeijerjeannette relevanceofsomatosensoryevokedpotentialamplitudeaftercardiacarrest |