Cargando…

Relevance of Somatosensory Evoked Potential Amplitude After Cardiac Arrest

Objective: We present relations of SSEP amplitude with neurological outcome and of SSEP amplitude with EEG amplitude in comatose patients after cardiac arrest. Methods: This is a post hoc analysis of a prospective cohort study in comatose patients after cardiac arrest. Amplitude of SSEP recordings o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Glimmerveen, Astrid B., Keijzer, Hanneke M., Ruijter, Barry J., Tjepkema-Cloostermans, Marleen C., van Putten, Michel J. A. M., Hofmeijer, Jeannette
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7212397/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32425878
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00335
_version_ 1783531613153394688
author Glimmerveen, Astrid B.
Keijzer, Hanneke M.
Ruijter, Barry J.
Tjepkema-Cloostermans, Marleen C.
van Putten, Michel J. A. M.
Hofmeijer, Jeannette
author_facet Glimmerveen, Astrid B.
Keijzer, Hanneke M.
Ruijter, Barry J.
Tjepkema-Cloostermans, Marleen C.
van Putten, Michel J. A. M.
Hofmeijer, Jeannette
author_sort Glimmerveen, Astrid B.
collection PubMed
description Objective: We present relations of SSEP amplitude with neurological outcome and of SSEP amplitude with EEG amplitude in comatose patients after cardiac arrest. Methods: This is a post hoc analysis of a prospective cohort study in comatose patients after cardiac arrest. Amplitude of SSEP recordings obtained within 48–72 h, and EEG patterns obtained at 12 and 24h after cardiac arrest were related to good (CPC 1-2) or poor (CPC 3-5) outcome at 6 months. In 39% of the study population multiple SSEP measurements were performed. Additionally, SSEP amplitude was related to mean EEG amplitude. Results: We included 138 patients (77% poor outcome). Absent SSEP responses, a N20 amplitude <0.4 μV within 48–72 h, and suppressed or synchronous EEG with suppressed background at 12 or 24 h after cardiac arrest were invariably associated with a poor outcome. Combined, these tests reached a sensitivity for prediction of poor outcome up to 58 at 100% specificity. N20 amplitude increased with a mean of 0.55 μV per day in patients with a poor outcome, and remained stable with a good outcome. There was no statistically significant correlation between SSEP and EEG amplitudes in 182 combined SSEP and EEG measurements (R(2) < 0.01). Conclusions: N20 amplitude <0.4 μV is invariably associated with poor outcome. There is no correlation between SSEP and EEG amplitude. Significance: SSEP amplitude analysis may contribute to outcome prediction after cardiac arrest.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7212397
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72123972020-05-18 Relevance of Somatosensory Evoked Potential Amplitude After Cardiac Arrest Glimmerveen, Astrid B. Keijzer, Hanneke M. Ruijter, Barry J. Tjepkema-Cloostermans, Marleen C. van Putten, Michel J. A. M. Hofmeijer, Jeannette Front Neurol Neurology Objective: We present relations of SSEP amplitude with neurological outcome and of SSEP amplitude with EEG amplitude in comatose patients after cardiac arrest. Methods: This is a post hoc analysis of a prospective cohort study in comatose patients after cardiac arrest. Amplitude of SSEP recordings obtained within 48–72 h, and EEG patterns obtained at 12 and 24h after cardiac arrest were related to good (CPC 1-2) or poor (CPC 3-5) outcome at 6 months. In 39% of the study population multiple SSEP measurements were performed. Additionally, SSEP amplitude was related to mean EEG amplitude. Results: We included 138 patients (77% poor outcome). Absent SSEP responses, a N20 amplitude <0.4 μV within 48–72 h, and suppressed or synchronous EEG with suppressed background at 12 or 24 h after cardiac arrest were invariably associated with a poor outcome. Combined, these tests reached a sensitivity for prediction of poor outcome up to 58 at 100% specificity. N20 amplitude increased with a mean of 0.55 μV per day in patients with a poor outcome, and remained stable with a good outcome. There was no statistically significant correlation between SSEP and EEG amplitudes in 182 combined SSEP and EEG measurements (R(2) < 0.01). Conclusions: N20 amplitude <0.4 μV is invariably associated with poor outcome. There is no correlation between SSEP and EEG amplitude. Significance: SSEP amplitude analysis may contribute to outcome prediction after cardiac arrest. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7212397/ /pubmed/32425878 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00335 Text en Copyright © 2020 Glimmerveen, Keijzer, Ruijter, Tjepkema-Cloostermans, van Putten and Hofmeijer. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Glimmerveen, Astrid B.
Keijzer, Hanneke M.
Ruijter, Barry J.
Tjepkema-Cloostermans, Marleen C.
van Putten, Michel J. A. M.
Hofmeijer, Jeannette
Relevance of Somatosensory Evoked Potential Amplitude After Cardiac Arrest
title Relevance of Somatosensory Evoked Potential Amplitude After Cardiac Arrest
title_full Relevance of Somatosensory Evoked Potential Amplitude After Cardiac Arrest
title_fullStr Relevance of Somatosensory Evoked Potential Amplitude After Cardiac Arrest
title_full_unstemmed Relevance of Somatosensory Evoked Potential Amplitude After Cardiac Arrest
title_short Relevance of Somatosensory Evoked Potential Amplitude After Cardiac Arrest
title_sort relevance of somatosensory evoked potential amplitude after cardiac arrest
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7212397/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32425878
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00335
work_keys_str_mv AT glimmerveenastridb relevanceofsomatosensoryevokedpotentialamplitudeaftercardiacarrest
AT keijzerhannekem relevanceofsomatosensoryevokedpotentialamplitudeaftercardiacarrest
AT ruijterbarryj relevanceofsomatosensoryevokedpotentialamplitudeaftercardiacarrest
AT tjepkemacloostermansmarleenc relevanceofsomatosensoryevokedpotentialamplitudeaftercardiacarrest
AT vanputtenmicheljam relevanceofsomatosensoryevokedpotentialamplitudeaftercardiacarrest
AT hofmeijerjeannette relevanceofsomatosensoryevokedpotentialamplitudeaftercardiacarrest