Cargando…

Engaging with stakeholders to inform the development of a decision-support tool for the NHS health check programme: qualitative study

BACKGROUND: The NHS Health Check Programme is a risk-reduction programme offered to all adults in England aged 40–74 years. Previous studies mainly focused on patient perspectives and programme delivery; however, delivery varies, and costs are substantial. We were therefore working with key stakehol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hyseni, Lirije, Guzman-Castillo, Maria, Kypridemos, Chris, Collins, Brendan, Schwaller, Ellen, Capewell, Simon, Boland, Angela, Dickson, Rumona, O’Flaherty, Martin, Gallacher, Kay, Hale, Peter, Lloyd-Williams, Ffion
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7212552/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32393313
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05268-5
_version_ 1783531639343677440
author Hyseni, Lirije
Guzman-Castillo, Maria
Kypridemos, Chris
Collins, Brendan
Schwaller, Ellen
Capewell, Simon
Boland, Angela
Dickson, Rumona
O’Flaherty, Martin
Gallacher, Kay
Hale, Peter
Lloyd-Williams, Ffion
author_facet Hyseni, Lirije
Guzman-Castillo, Maria
Kypridemos, Chris
Collins, Brendan
Schwaller, Ellen
Capewell, Simon
Boland, Angela
Dickson, Rumona
O’Flaherty, Martin
Gallacher, Kay
Hale, Peter
Lloyd-Williams, Ffion
author_sort Hyseni, Lirije
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The NHS Health Check Programme is a risk-reduction programme offered to all adults in England aged 40–74 years. Previous studies mainly focused on patient perspectives and programme delivery; however, delivery varies, and costs are substantial. We were therefore working with key stakeholders to develop and co-produce an NHS Health Check Programme modelling tool (workHORSE) for commissioners to quantify local effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and equity. Here we report on Workshop 1, which specifically aimed to facilitate engagement with stakeholders; develop a shared understanding of current Health Check implementation; identify what is working well, less well, and future hopes; and explore features to include in the tool. METHODS: This qualitative study identified key stakeholders across the UK via networking and snowball techniques. The stakeholders spanned local organisations (NHS commissioners, GPs, and academics), third sector and national organisations (Public Health England and The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence). We used the validated Hovmand “group model building” approach to engage stakeholders in a series of pre-piloted, structured, small group exercises. We then used Framework Analysis to analyse responses. RESULTS: Fifteen stakeholders participated in workshop 1. Stakeholders identified continued financial and political support for the NHS Health Check Programme. However, many stakeholders highlighted issues concerning lack of data on processes and outcomes, variability in quality of delivery, and suboptimal public engagement. Stakeholders’ hopes included maximising coverage, uptake, and referrals, and producing additional evidence on population health, equity, and economic impacts. Key model suggestions focused on developing good-practice template scenarios, analysis of broader prevention activities at local level, accessible local data, broader economic perspectives, and fit-for-purpose outputs. CONCLUSIONS: A shared understanding of current implementations of the NHS Health Check Programme was developed. Stakeholders demonstrated their commitment to the NHS Health Check Programme whilst highlighting the perceived requirements for enhancing the service and discussed how the modelling tool could be instrumental in this process. These suggestions for improvement informed subsequent workshops and model development.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7212552
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72125522020-05-18 Engaging with stakeholders to inform the development of a decision-support tool for the NHS health check programme: qualitative study Hyseni, Lirije Guzman-Castillo, Maria Kypridemos, Chris Collins, Brendan Schwaller, Ellen Capewell, Simon Boland, Angela Dickson, Rumona O’Flaherty, Martin Gallacher, Kay Hale, Peter Lloyd-Williams, Ffion BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The NHS Health Check Programme is a risk-reduction programme offered to all adults in England aged 40–74 years. Previous studies mainly focused on patient perspectives and programme delivery; however, delivery varies, and costs are substantial. We were therefore working with key stakeholders to develop and co-produce an NHS Health Check Programme modelling tool (workHORSE) for commissioners to quantify local effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and equity. Here we report on Workshop 1, which specifically aimed to facilitate engagement with stakeholders; develop a shared understanding of current Health Check implementation; identify what is working well, less well, and future hopes; and explore features to include in the tool. METHODS: This qualitative study identified key stakeholders across the UK via networking and snowball techniques. The stakeholders spanned local organisations (NHS commissioners, GPs, and academics), third sector and national organisations (Public Health England and The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence). We used the validated Hovmand “group model building” approach to engage stakeholders in a series of pre-piloted, structured, small group exercises. We then used Framework Analysis to analyse responses. RESULTS: Fifteen stakeholders participated in workshop 1. Stakeholders identified continued financial and political support for the NHS Health Check Programme. However, many stakeholders highlighted issues concerning lack of data on processes and outcomes, variability in quality of delivery, and suboptimal public engagement. Stakeholders’ hopes included maximising coverage, uptake, and referrals, and producing additional evidence on population health, equity, and economic impacts. Key model suggestions focused on developing good-practice template scenarios, analysis of broader prevention activities at local level, accessible local data, broader economic perspectives, and fit-for-purpose outputs. CONCLUSIONS: A shared understanding of current implementations of the NHS Health Check Programme was developed. Stakeholders demonstrated their commitment to the NHS Health Check Programme whilst highlighting the perceived requirements for enhancing the service and discussed how the modelling tool could be instrumental in this process. These suggestions for improvement informed subsequent workshops and model development. BioMed Central 2020-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7212552/ /pubmed/32393313 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05268-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hyseni, Lirije
Guzman-Castillo, Maria
Kypridemos, Chris
Collins, Brendan
Schwaller, Ellen
Capewell, Simon
Boland, Angela
Dickson, Rumona
O’Flaherty, Martin
Gallacher, Kay
Hale, Peter
Lloyd-Williams, Ffion
Engaging with stakeholders to inform the development of a decision-support tool for the NHS health check programme: qualitative study
title Engaging with stakeholders to inform the development of a decision-support tool for the NHS health check programme: qualitative study
title_full Engaging with stakeholders to inform the development of a decision-support tool for the NHS health check programme: qualitative study
title_fullStr Engaging with stakeholders to inform the development of a decision-support tool for the NHS health check programme: qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Engaging with stakeholders to inform the development of a decision-support tool for the NHS health check programme: qualitative study
title_short Engaging with stakeholders to inform the development of a decision-support tool for the NHS health check programme: qualitative study
title_sort engaging with stakeholders to inform the development of a decision-support tool for the nhs health check programme: qualitative study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7212552/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32393313
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05268-5
work_keys_str_mv AT hysenilirije engagingwithstakeholderstoinformthedevelopmentofadecisionsupporttoolforthenhshealthcheckprogrammequalitativestudy
AT guzmancastillomaria engagingwithstakeholderstoinformthedevelopmentofadecisionsupporttoolforthenhshealthcheckprogrammequalitativestudy
AT kypridemoschris engagingwithstakeholderstoinformthedevelopmentofadecisionsupporttoolforthenhshealthcheckprogrammequalitativestudy
AT collinsbrendan engagingwithstakeholderstoinformthedevelopmentofadecisionsupporttoolforthenhshealthcheckprogrammequalitativestudy
AT schwallerellen engagingwithstakeholderstoinformthedevelopmentofadecisionsupporttoolforthenhshealthcheckprogrammequalitativestudy
AT capewellsimon engagingwithstakeholderstoinformthedevelopmentofadecisionsupporttoolforthenhshealthcheckprogrammequalitativestudy
AT bolandangela engagingwithstakeholderstoinformthedevelopmentofadecisionsupporttoolforthenhshealthcheckprogrammequalitativestudy
AT dicksonrumona engagingwithstakeholderstoinformthedevelopmentofadecisionsupporttoolforthenhshealthcheckprogrammequalitativestudy
AT oflahertymartin engagingwithstakeholderstoinformthedevelopmentofadecisionsupporttoolforthenhshealthcheckprogrammequalitativestudy
AT gallacherkay engagingwithstakeholderstoinformthedevelopmentofadecisionsupporttoolforthenhshealthcheckprogrammequalitativestudy
AT halepeter engagingwithstakeholderstoinformthedevelopmentofadecisionsupporttoolforthenhshealthcheckprogrammequalitativestudy
AT lloydwilliamsffion engagingwithstakeholderstoinformthedevelopmentofadecisionsupporttoolforthenhshealthcheckprogrammequalitativestudy