Cargando…

Target Product Profiles for medical tests: a systematic review of current methods

BACKGROUND: A Target Product Profile (TPP) outlines the necessary characteristics of an innovative product to address an unmet clinical need. TPPs could be used to better guide manufacturers in the development of ‘fit for purpose’ tests, thus increasing the likelihood that novel tests will progress...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cocco, Paola, Ayaz-Shah, Anam, Messenger, Michael Paul, West, Robert Michael, Shinkins, Bethany
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7212678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32389127
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01582-1
_version_ 1783531658131013632
author Cocco, Paola
Ayaz-Shah, Anam
Messenger, Michael Paul
West, Robert Michael
Shinkins, Bethany
author_facet Cocco, Paola
Ayaz-Shah, Anam
Messenger, Michael Paul
West, Robert Michael
Shinkins, Bethany
author_sort Cocco, Paola
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A Target Product Profile (TPP) outlines the necessary characteristics of an innovative product to address an unmet clinical need. TPPs could be used to better guide manufacturers in the development of ‘fit for purpose’ tests, thus increasing the likelihood that novel tests will progress from bench to bedside. However, there is currently no guidance on how to produce a TPP specifically for medical tests. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted to summarise the methods currently used to develop TPPs for medical tests, the sources used to inform these recommendations and the test characteristics for which targets are made. Database and website searches were conducted in November 2018. TPPs written in English for any medical test were included. Based on an existing framework, test characteristics were clustered into commonly recognised themes. RESULTS: Forty-four TPPs were identified, all of which focused on diagnostic tests for infectious diseases. Three core decision-making phases for developing TPPs were identified: scoping, drafting and consensus-building. Consultations with experts and the literature mostly informed the scoping and drafting of TPPs. All TPPs provided information on unmet clinical need and desirable analytical performance, and the majority specified clinical validity characteristics. Few TPPs described specifications for clinical utility, and none included cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: We have identified a commonly used framework that could be beneficial for anyone interested in drafting a TPP for a medical test. Currently, key outcomes such as utility and cost-effectiveness are largely overlooked within TPPs though and we foresee this as an area for further improvement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7212678
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72126782020-05-18 Target Product Profiles for medical tests: a systematic review of current methods Cocco, Paola Ayaz-Shah, Anam Messenger, Michael Paul West, Robert Michael Shinkins, Bethany BMC Med Research Article BACKGROUND: A Target Product Profile (TPP) outlines the necessary characteristics of an innovative product to address an unmet clinical need. TPPs could be used to better guide manufacturers in the development of ‘fit for purpose’ tests, thus increasing the likelihood that novel tests will progress from bench to bedside. However, there is currently no guidance on how to produce a TPP specifically for medical tests. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted to summarise the methods currently used to develop TPPs for medical tests, the sources used to inform these recommendations and the test characteristics for which targets are made. Database and website searches were conducted in November 2018. TPPs written in English for any medical test were included. Based on an existing framework, test characteristics were clustered into commonly recognised themes. RESULTS: Forty-four TPPs were identified, all of which focused on diagnostic tests for infectious diseases. Three core decision-making phases for developing TPPs were identified: scoping, drafting and consensus-building. Consultations with experts and the literature mostly informed the scoping and drafting of TPPs. All TPPs provided information on unmet clinical need and desirable analytical performance, and the majority specified clinical validity characteristics. Few TPPs described specifications for clinical utility, and none included cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: We have identified a commonly used framework that could be beneficial for anyone interested in drafting a TPP for a medical test. Currently, key outcomes such as utility and cost-effectiveness are largely overlooked within TPPs though and we foresee this as an area for further improvement. BioMed Central 2020-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7212678/ /pubmed/32389127 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01582-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Cocco, Paola
Ayaz-Shah, Anam
Messenger, Michael Paul
West, Robert Michael
Shinkins, Bethany
Target Product Profiles for medical tests: a systematic review of current methods
title Target Product Profiles for medical tests: a systematic review of current methods
title_full Target Product Profiles for medical tests: a systematic review of current methods
title_fullStr Target Product Profiles for medical tests: a systematic review of current methods
title_full_unstemmed Target Product Profiles for medical tests: a systematic review of current methods
title_short Target Product Profiles for medical tests: a systematic review of current methods
title_sort target product profiles for medical tests: a systematic review of current methods
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7212678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32389127
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01582-1
work_keys_str_mv AT coccopaola targetproductprofilesformedicaltestsasystematicreviewofcurrentmethods
AT ayazshahanam targetproductprofilesformedicaltestsasystematicreviewofcurrentmethods
AT messengermichaelpaul targetproductprofilesformedicaltestsasystematicreviewofcurrentmethods
AT westrobertmichael targetproductprofilesformedicaltestsasystematicreviewofcurrentmethods
AT shinkinsbethany targetproductprofilesformedicaltestsasystematicreviewofcurrentmethods