Cargando…

Comparison of epidemiology, treatments, and outcomes in pediatric versus adult ependymoma

BACKGROUND: Mounting evidence supports the presence of heterogeneity in the presentation of ependymoma patients with respect to location, histopathology, and behavior between pediatric and adult patients. However, the influence of age on treatment outcomes in ependymoma remains obscure. METHODS: The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elsamadicy, Aladine A, Koo, Andrew B, David, Wyatt B, Lee, Victor, Zogg, Cheryl K, Kundishora, Adam J, Hong, Christopher S, DeSpenza, Tyrone, Reeves, Benjamin C, Kahle, Kristopher T, DiLuna, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7212900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32642681
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdaa019
_version_ 1783531695225438208
author Elsamadicy, Aladine A
Koo, Andrew B
David, Wyatt B
Lee, Victor
Zogg, Cheryl K
Kundishora, Adam J
Hong, Christopher S
DeSpenza, Tyrone
Reeves, Benjamin C
Kahle, Kristopher T
DiLuna, Michael
author_facet Elsamadicy, Aladine A
Koo, Andrew B
David, Wyatt B
Lee, Victor
Zogg, Cheryl K
Kundishora, Adam J
Hong, Christopher S
DeSpenza, Tyrone
Reeves, Benjamin C
Kahle, Kristopher T
DiLuna, Michael
author_sort Elsamadicy, Aladine A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mounting evidence supports the presence of heterogeneity in the presentation of ependymoma patients with respect to location, histopathology, and behavior between pediatric and adult patients. However, the influence of age on treatment outcomes in ependymoma remains obscure. METHODS: The SEER database years 1975–2016 were queried. Patients with a diagnosis of ependymoma were identified using the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, Third Edition, coding system. Patients were classified into one of 4 age groups: children (age 0–12 years), adolescents (age 13–21 years), young adults (age 22–45 years), and older adults (age >45 years). The weighed multivariate analysis assessed the impact of age on survival outcomes following surgical treatment. RESULTS: There were a total of 6076 patients identified with ependymoma, of which 1111 (18%) were children, 529 (9%) were adolescents, 2039 (34%) were young adults, and 2397 (40%) were older adults. There were statistically significant differences between cohorts with respect to race (P < .001), anatomical location (P < .001), extent of resection (P < .001), radiation use (P < .001), tumor grade (P < .001), histological classification (P < .001), and all-cause mortality (P < .001). There was no significant difference between cohorts with respect to gender (P = .103). On multivariate logistic regression, factors associated with all-cause mortality rates included males (vs females), supratentorial location (vs spinal cord tumors), and radiation treatment (vs no radiation). CONCLUSIONS: Our study using the SEER database demonstrates the various demographic and treatment risk factors that are associated with increased rates of all-cause mortality between the pediatric and adult populations following a diagnosis of ependymoma.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7212900
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72129002020-07-07 Comparison of epidemiology, treatments, and outcomes in pediatric versus adult ependymoma Elsamadicy, Aladine A Koo, Andrew B David, Wyatt B Lee, Victor Zogg, Cheryl K Kundishora, Adam J Hong, Christopher S DeSpenza, Tyrone Reeves, Benjamin C Kahle, Kristopher T DiLuna, Michael Neurooncol Adv Clinical Investigations BACKGROUND: Mounting evidence supports the presence of heterogeneity in the presentation of ependymoma patients with respect to location, histopathology, and behavior between pediatric and adult patients. However, the influence of age on treatment outcomes in ependymoma remains obscure. METHODS: The SEER database years 1975–2016 were queried. Patients with a diagnosis of ependymoma were identified using the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, Third Edition, coding system. Patients were classified into one of 4 age groups: children (age 0–12 years), adolescents (age 13–21 years), young adults (age 22–45 years), and older adults (age >45 years). The weighed multivariate analysis assessed the impact of age on survival outcomes following surgical treatment. RESULTS: There were a total of 6076 patients identified with ependymoma, of which 1111 (18%) were children, 529 (9%) were adolescents, 2039 (34%) were young adults, and 2397 (40%) were older adults. There were statistically significant differences between cohorts with respect to race (P < .001), anatomical location (P < .001), extent of resection (P < .001), radiation use (P < .001), tumor grade (P < .001), histological classification (P < .001), and all-cause mortality (P < .001). There was no significant difference between cohorts with respect to gender (P = .103). On multivariate logistic regression, factors associated with all-cause mortality rates included males (vs females), supratentorial location (vs spinal cord tumors), and radiation treatment (vs no radiation). CONCLUSIONS: Our study using the SEER database demonstrates the various demographic and treatment risk factors that are associated with increased rates of all-cause mortality between the pediatric and adult populations following a diagnosis of ependymoma. Oxford University Press 2020-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7212900/ /pubmed/32642681 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdaa019 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press, the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Clinical Investigations
Elsamadicy, Aladine A
Koo, Andrew B
David, Wyatt B
Lee, Victor
Zogg, Cheryl K
Kundishora, Adam J
Hong, Christopher S
DeSpenza, Tyrone
Reeves, Benjamin C
Kahle, Kristopher T
DiLuna, Michael
Comparison of epidemiology, treatments, and outcomes in pediatric versus adult ependymoma
title Comparison of epidemiology, treatments, and outcomes in pediatric versus adult ependymoma
title_full Comparison of epidemiology, treatments, and outcomes in pediatric versus adult ependymoma
title_fullStr Comparison of epidemiology, treatments, and outcomes in pediatric versus adult ependymoma
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of epidemiology, treatments, and outcomes in pediatric versus adult ependymoma
title_short Comparison of epidemiology, treatments, and outcomes in pediatric versus adult ependymoma
title_sort comparison of epidemiology, treatments, and outcomes in pediatric versus adult ependymoma
topic Clinical Investigations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7212900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32642681
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdaa019
work_keys_str_mv AT elsamadicyaladinea comparisonofepidemiologytreatmentsandoutcomesinpediatricversusadultependymoma
AT kooandrewb comparisonofepidemiologytreatmentsandoutcomesinpediatricversusadultependymoma
AT davidwyattb comparisonofepidemiologytreatmentsandoutcomesinpediatricversusadultependymoma
AT leevictor comparisonofepidemiologytreatmentsandoutcomesinpediatricversusadultependymoma
AT zoggcherylk comparisonofepidemiologytreatmentsandoutcomesinpediatricversusadultependymoma
AT kundishoraadamj comparisonofepidemiologytreatmentsandoutcomesinpediatricversusadultependymoma
AT hongchristophers comparisonofepidemiologytreatmentsandoutcomesinpediatricversusadultependymoma
AT despenzatyrone comparisonofepidemiologytreatmentsandoutcomesinpediatricversusadultependymoma
AT reevesbenjaminc comparisonofepidemiologytreatmentsandoutcomesinpediatricversusadultependymoma
AT kahlekristophert comparisonofepidemiologytreatmentsandoutcomesinpediatricversusadultependymoma
AT dilunamichael comparisonofepidemiologytreatmentsandoutcomesinpediatricversusadultependymoma