Cargando…

RADI-36. FRAME-BASED VERSUS FRAMELESS GAMMA KNIFE RADIOSURGERY FOR BRAIN METASTASES

INTRODUCTION: Brain metastases occur in 10 to 40% of cancer patients. In an effort to avoid the neurocognitive toxicities of whole brain radiation therapy, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has become the preferred treatment option for most brain metastases. Many cancer patients will require several r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patel, Ankur, Plitt, Aaron, Mendel, Jameson, Nedzi, Lucien, Timmerman, Robert, Dan, Tu, Barnett, Samuel, Mickey, Bruce, Wardak, Zabi, Patel, Toral
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7213085/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdz014.128
_version_ 1783531725569130496
author Patel, Ankur
Plitt, Aaron
Mendel, Jameson
Nedzi, Lucien
Timmerman, Robert
Dan, Tu
Barnett, Samuel
Mickey, Bruce
Wardak, Zabi
Patel, Toral
author_facet Patel, Ankur
Plitt, Aaron
Mendel, Jameson
Nedzi, Lucien
Timmerman, Robert
Dan, Tu
Barnett, Samuel
Mickey, Bruce
Wardak, Zabi
Patel, Toral
author_sort Patel, Ankur
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Brain metastases occur in 10 to 40% of cancer patients. In an effort to avoid the neurocognitive toxicities of whole brain radiation therapy, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has become the preferred treatment option for most brain metastases. Many cancer patients will require several rounds of SRS during the course of their disease. Frame-based radiosurgery causes physical discomfort with each treatment session. We present our experience with frameless Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) and compare the clinical outcomes to frame-based treatments in the same patient cohort. METHODS: We evaluated all patients with brain metastases who underwent both frame-based and frameless SRS, using the Gamma Knife ICON, between January 2017 and November 2018. 11 patients with 110 unique lesions were included in this analysis. Clinical outcomes, including local control, were compared between the two treatment modalities. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 60.0 (range: 41 – 76) years. Median follow-up was 7.9 (range: 0 – 22.1) months. Median number of metastases treated was 4 (range: 1 – 9) per frame-based treatment and 3 (range: 1 – 10) per frameless treatment. Median number of frame-based and frameless procedures, per patient, was 1 (range: 1 – 3) and 1 (range: 1 – 2), respectively. Median tumor volume was 0.06 (range: 0.01 – 11.49) cm(3) in the frame-based treatments and 0.14 (range: 0.01 – 4.22) cm(3) in the frameless treatments. Median margin dose was 18 Gy for both the frame-based and frameless treatments. Local control was 86.5 and 91.5% at 6 and 9 months post-treatment, respectively in the frame-based treatments and 82.8 and 87.5% at 6 and 9 months post-treatment, respectively in the frameless treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Frameless GKRS results in similar rates of local control compared to frame-based GKRS. This treatment option should be considered in patients undergoing GKRS, as it balances clinical outcomes with patient comfort.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7213085
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72130852020-07-07 RADI-36. FRAME-BASED VERSUS FRAMELESS GAMMA KNIFE RADIOSURGERY FOR BRAIN METASTASES Patel, Ankur Plitt, Aaron Mendel, Jameson Nedzi, Lucien Timmerman, Robert Dan, Tu Barnett, Samuel Mickey, Bruce Wardak, Zabi Patel, Toral Neurooncol Adv Abstracts INTRODUCTION: Brain metastases occur in 10 to 40% of cancer patients. In an effort to avoid the neurocognitive toxicities of whole brain radiation therapy, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has become the preferred treatment option for most brain metastases. Many cancer patients will require several rounds of SRS during the course of their disease. Frame-based radiosurgery causes physical discomfort with each treatment session. We present our experience with frameless Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) and compare the clinical outcomes to frame-based treatments in the same patient cohort. METHODS: We evaluated all patients with brain metastases who underwent both frame-based and frameless SRS, using the Gamma Knife ICON, between January 2017 and November 2018. 11 patients with 110 unique lesions were included in this analysis. Clinical outcomes, including local control, were compared between the two treatment modalities. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 60.0 (range: 41 – 76) years. Median follow-up was 7.9 (range: 0 – 22.1) months. Median number of metastases treated was 4 (range: 1 – 9) per frame-based treatment and 3 (range: 1 – 10) per frameless treatment. Median number of frame-based and frameless procedures, per patient, was 1 (range: 1 – 3) and 1 (range: 1 – 2), respectively. Median tumor volume was 0.06 (range: 0.01 – 11.49) cm(3) in the frame-based treatments and 0.14 (range: 0.01 – 4.22) cm(3) in the frameless treatments. Median margin dose was 18 Gy for both the frame-based and frameless treatments. Local control was 86.5 and 91.5% at 6 and 9 months post-treatment, respectively in the frame-based treatments and 82.8 and 87.5% at 6 and 9 months post-treatment, respectively in the frameless treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Frameless GKRS results in similar rates of local control compared to frame-based GKRS. This treatment option should be considered in patients undergoing GKRS, as it balances clinical outcomes with patient comfort. Oxford University Press 2019-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7213085/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdz014.128 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press, the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Patel, Ankur
Plitt, Aaron
Mendel, Jameson
Nedzi, Lucien
Timmerman, Robert
Dan, Tu
Barnett, Samuel
Mickey, Bruce
Wardak, Zabi
Patel, Toral
RADI-36. FRAME-BASED VERSUS FRAMELESS GAMMA KNIFE RADIOSURGERY FOR BRAIN METASTASES
title RADI-36. FRAME-BASED VERSUS FRAMELESS GAMMA KNIFE RADIOSURGERY FOR BRAIN METASTASES
title_full RADI-36. FRAME-BASED VERSUS FRAMELESS GAMMA KNIFE RADIOSURGERY FOR BRAIN METASTASES
title_fullStr RADI-36. FRAME-BASED VERSUS FRAMELESS GAMMA KNIFE RADIOSURGERY FOR BRAIN METASTASES
title_full_unstemmed RADI-36. FRAME-BASED VERSUS FRAMELESS GAMMA KNIFE RADIOSURGERY FOR BRAIN METASTASES
title_short RADI-36. FRAME-BASED VERSUS FRAMELESS GAMMA KNIFE RADIOSURGERY FOR BRAIN METASTASES
title_sort radi-36. frame-based versus frameless gamma knife radiosurgery for brain metastases
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7213085/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdz014.128
work_keys_str_mv AT patelankur radi36framebasedversusframelessgammakniferadiosurgeryforbrainmetastases
AT plittaaron radi36framebasedversusframelessgammakniferadiosurgeryforbrainmetastases
AT mendeljameson radi36framebasedversusframelessgammakniferadiosurgeryforbrainmetastases
AT nedzilucien radi36framebasedversusframelessgammakniferadiosurgeryforbrainmetastases
AT timmermanrobert radi36framebasedversusframelessgammakniferadiosurgeryforbrainmetastases
AT dantu radi36framebasedversusframelessgammakniferadiosurgeryforbrainmetastases
AT barnettsamuel radi36framebasedversusframelessgammakniferadiosurgeryforbrainmetastases
AT mickeybruce radi36framebasedversusframelessgammakniferadiosurgeryforbrainmetastases
AT wardakzabi radi36framebasedversusframelessgammakniferadiosurgeryforbrainmetastases
AT pateltoral radi36framebasedversusframelessgammakniferadiosurgeryforbrainmetastases