Cargando…
RADI-36. FRAME-BASED VERSUS FRAMELESS GAMMA KNIFE RADIOSURGERY FOR BRAIN METASTASES
INTRODUCTION: Brain metastases occur in 10 to 40% of cancer patients. In an effort to avoid the neurocognitive toxicities of whole brain radiation therapy, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has become the preferred treatment option for most brain metastases. Many cancer patients will require several r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7213085/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdz014.128 |
_version_ | 1783531725569130496 |
---|---|
author | Patel, Ankur Plitt, Aaron Mendel, Jameson Nedzi, Lucien Timmerman, Robert Dan, Tu Barnett, Samuel Mickey, Bruce Wardak, Zabi Patel, Toral |
author_facet | Patel, Ankur Plitt, Aaron Mendel, Jameson Nedzi, Lucien Timmerman, Robert Dan, Tu Barnett, Samuel Mickey, Bruce Wardak, Zabi Patel, Toral |
author_sort | Patel, Ankur |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Brain metastases occur in 10 to 40% of cancer patients. In an effort to avoid the neurocognitive toxicities of whole brain radiation therapy, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has become the preferred treatment option for most brain metastases. Many cancer patients will require several rounds of SRS during the course of their disease. Frame-based radiosurgery causes physical discomfort with each treatment session. We present our experience with frameless Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) and compare the clinical outcomes to frame-based treatments in the same patient cohort. METHODS: We evaluated all patients with brain metastases who underwent both frame-based and frameless SRS, using the Gamma Knife ICON, between January 2017 and November 2018. 11 patients with 110 unique lesions were included in this analysis. Clinical outcomes, including local control, were compared between the two treatment modalities. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 60.0 (range: 41 – 76) years. Median follow-up was 7.9 (range: 0 – 22.1) months. Median number of metastases treated was 4 (range: 1 – 9) per frame-based treatment and 3 (range: 1 – 10) per frameless treatment. Median number of frame-based and frameless procedures, per patient, was 1 (range: 1 – 3) and 1 (range: 1 – 2), respectively. Median tumor volume was 0.06 (range: 0.01 – 11.49) cm(3) in the frame-based treatments and 0.14 (range: 0.01 – 4.22) cm(3) in the frameless treatments. Median margin dose was 18 Gy for both the frame-based and frameless treatments. Local control was 86.5 and 91.5% at 6 and 9 months post-treatment, respectively in the frame-based treatments and 82.8 and 87.5% at 6 and 9 months post-treatment, respectively in the frameless treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Frameless GKRS results in similar rates of local control compared to frame-based GKRS. This treatment option should be considered in patients undergoing GKRS, as it balances clinical outcomes with patient comfort. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7213085 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72130852020-07-07 RADI-36. FRAME-BASED VERSUS FRAMELESS GAMMA KNIFE RADIOSURGERY FOR BRAIN METASTASES Patel, Ankur Plitt, Aaron Mendel, Jameson Nedzi, Lucien Timmerman, Robert Dan, Tu Barnett, Samuel Mickey, Bruce Wardak, Zabi Patel, Toral Neurooncol Adv Abstracts INTRODUCTION: Brain metastases occur in 10 to 40% of cancer patients. In an effort to avoid the neurocognitive toxicities of whole brain radiation therapy, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has become the preferred treatment option for most brain metastases. Many cancer patients will require several rounds of SRS during the course of their disease. Frame-based radiosurgery causes physical discomfort with each treatment session. We present our experience with frameless Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) and compare the clinical outcomes to frame-based treatments in the same patient cohort. METHODS: We evaluated all patients with brain metastases who underwent both frame-based and frameless SRS, using the Gamma Knife ICON, between January 2017 and November 2018. 11 patients with 110 unique lesions were included in this analysis. Clinical outcomes, including local control, were compared between the two treatment modalities. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 60.0 (range: 41 – 76) years. Median follow-up was 7.9 (range: 0 – 22.1) months. Median number of metastases treated was 4 (range: 1 – 9) per frame-based treatment and 3 (range: 1 – 10) per frameless treatment. Median number of frame-based and frameless procedures, per patient, was 1 (range: 1 – 3) and 1 (range: 1 – 2), respectively. Median tumor volume was 0.06 (range: 0.01 – 11.49) cm(3) in the frame-based treatments and 0.14 (range: 0.01 – 4.22) cm(3) in the frameless treatments. Median margin dose was 18 Gy for both the frame-based and frameless treatments. Local control was 86.5 and 91.5% at 6 and 9 months post-treatment, respectively in the frame-based treatments and 82.8 and 87.5% at 6 and 9 months post-treatment, respectively in the frameless treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Frameless GKRS results in similar rates of local control compared to frame-based GKRS. This treatment option should be considered in patients undergoing GKRS, as it balances clinical outcomes with patient comfort. Oxford University Press 2019-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7213085/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdz014.128 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press, the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Patel, Ankur Plitt, Aaron Mendel, Jameson Nedzi, Lucien Timmerman, Robert Dan, Tu Barnett, Samuel Mickey, Bruce Wardak, Zabi Patel, Toral RADI-36. FRAME-BASED VERSUS FRAMELESS GAMMA KNIFE RADIOSURGERY FOR BRAIN METASTASES |
title | RADI-36. FRAME-BASED VERSUS FRAMELESS GAMMA KNIFE RADIOSURGERY FOR BRAIN METASTASES |
title_full | RADI-36. FRAME-BASED VERSUS FRAMELESS GAMMA KNIFE RADIOSURGERY FOR BRAIN METASTASES |
title_fullStr | RADI-36. FRAME-BASED VERSUS FRAMELESS GAMMA KNIFE RADIOSURGERY FOR BRAIN METASTASES |
title_full_unstemmed | RADI-36. FRAME-BASED VERSUS FRAMELESS GAMMA KNIFE RADIOSURGERY FOR BRAIN METASTASES |
title_short | RADI-36. FRAME-BASED VERSUS FRAMELESS GAMMA KNIFE RADIOSURGERY FOR BRAIN METASTASES |
title_sort | radi-36. frame-based versus frameless gamma knife radiosurgery for brain metastases |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7213085/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdz014.128 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT patelankur radi36framebasedversusframelessgammakniferadiosurgeryforbrainmetastases AT plittaaron radi36framebasedversusframelessgammakniferadiosurgeryforbrainmetastases AT mendeljameson radi36framebasedversusframelessgammakniferadiosurgeryforbrainmetastases AT nedzilucien radi36framebasedversusframelessgammakniferadiosurgeryforbrainmetastases AT timmermanrobert radi36framebasedversusframelessgammakniferadiosurgeryforbrainmetastases AT dantu radi36framebasedversusframelessgammakniferadiosurgeryforbrainmetastases AT barnettsamuel radi36framebasedversusframelessgammakniferadiosurgeryforbrainmetastases AT mickeybruce radi36framebasedversusframelessgammakniferadiosurgeryforbrainmetastases AT wardakzabi radi36framebasedversusframelessgammakniferadiosurgeryforbrainmetastases AT pateltoral radi36framebasedversusframelessgammakniferadiosurgeryforbrainmetastases |