Cargando…

MLTI-13. RESPONSE ASSESSMENT OF MELANOMA BRAIN METASTASES TREATED BY STEREOTACTIC RADIOTHERAPY OR IMMUNOTHERAPY OR BOTH: A COMPARISON OF RECIST 1.1, RANO AND iRANO CRITERIA

BACKGROUND: The evaluation of response for brain metastases (BM) may be challenging in the context of treatment by stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) or immunotherapy or both. METHODS: We reviewed clinical and neuroimaging data of 62 melanoma patients with newly diagnosed BM treated by the combination...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Le Rhun, Emilie, Wolpert, Fabian, Fialek, Maud, Devos, Patrick, Andratschke, Nicolaus, Reyns, Nicolas, Dummer, Reinhard, Mortier, Laurent, Weller, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7213092/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdz014.072
_version_ 1783531727192326144
author Le Rhun, Emilie
Wolpert, Fabian
Fialek, Maud
Devos, Patrick
Andratschke, Nicolaus
Reyns, Nicolas
Dummer, Reinhard
Mortier, Laurent
Weller, Michael
author_facet Le Rhun, Emilie
Wolpert, Fabian
Fialek, Maud
Devos, Patrick
Andratschke, Nicolaus
Reyns, Nicolas
Dummer, Reinhard
Mortier, Laurent
Weller, Michael
author_sort Le Rhun, Emilie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The evaluation of response for brain metastases (BM) may be challenging in the context of treatment by stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) or immunotherapy or both. METHODS: We reviewed clinical and neuroimaging data of 62 melanoma patients with newly diagnosed BM treated by the combination of immunotherapy and SRT (n=33, group A), immunotherapy alone (n=10, group B) or SRT alone or in combination with other systemic therapies (n=19, group C). Response was assessed using RECIST 1.1, RANO or iRANO criteria. RESULTS: BRAF mutations were noted in 26 patients. 54 patients (87%) had 1–3 metastases. The median DS-GPA was 3. After a median follow-up of 30.5 months, 39 patients have experienced CNS progression, 16 (48.5%) in group A, 9 (90%) in group B, 14 (73.5%) in group C. Median PFS was 129.5 days (range 82–532) in group A, 75 days (range 35–203) in group B, 136 days (range 59–514) in group C. Forty-seven patients (76%) had died at the time of the analysis, 22 (66.5%) in group A, 7 (70%) in group B, 18 (94.5%) in group C. Median OS was 345 days (range 65–1824) in group A, 174.5 days (range 50–1361) in group B, 409 days (range 102–1244) in group C. 52 MRI scans were available for central review: pseudoprogression was documented in 9 patients (29%) in group A, 0 (0%) in group B, 5 (29.5%) in group C. Response rates were similar with all three sets of response criteria. Progressive disease was less often called when applying iRANO to assess SRT target lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the retrospective nature and the small sample size, these data may indicate that the omission of SRT from first-line treatment may compromise outcome. Pseudoprogression is uncommon with immunotherapy alone; pseudoprogression rates were similar after SRT alone or in combination with immunotherapy or other systemic treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7213092
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72130922020-07-07 MLTI-13. RESPONSE ASSESSMENT OF MELANOMA BRAIN METASTASES TREATED BY STEREOTACTIC RADIOTHERAPY OR IMMUNOTHERAPY OR BOTH: A COMPARISON OF RECIST 1.1, RANO AND iRANO CRITERIA Le Rhun, Emilie Wolpert, Fabian Fialek, Maud Devos, Patrick Andratschke, Nicolaus Reyns, Nicolas Dummer, Reinhard Mortier, Laurent Weller, Michael Neurooncol Adv Abstracts BACKGROUND: The evaluation of response for brain metastases (BM) may be challenging in the context of treatment by stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) or immunotherapy or both. METHODS: We reviewed clinical and neuroimaging data of 62 melanoma patients with newly diagnosed BM treated by the combination of immunotherapy and SRT (n=33, group A), immunotherapy alone (n=10, group B) or SRT alone or in combination with other systemic therapies (n=19, group C). Response was assessed using RECIST 1.1, RANO or iRANO criteria. RESULTS: BRAF mutations were noted in 26 patients. 54 patients (87%) had 1–3 metastases. The median DS-GPA was 3. After a median follow-up of 30.5 months, 39 patients have experienced CNS progression, 16 (48.5%) in group A, 9 (90%) in group B, 14 (73.5%) in group C. Median PFS was 129.5 days (range 82–532) in group A, 75 days (range 35–203) in group B, 136 days (range 59–514) in group C. Forty-seven patients (76%) had died at the time of the analysis, 22 (66.5%) in group A, 7 (70%) in group B, 18 (94.5%) in group C. Median OS was 345 days (range 65–1824) in group A, 174.5 days (range 50–1361) in group B, 409 days (range 102–1244) in group C. 52 MRI scans were available for central review: pseudoprogression was documented in 9 patients (29%) in group A, 0 (0%) in group B, 5 (29.5%) in group C. Response rates were similar with all three sets of response criteria. Progressive disease was less often called when applying iRANO to assess SRT target lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the retrospective nature and the small sample size, these data may indicate that the omission of SRT from first-line treatment may compromise outcome. Pseudoprogression is uncommon with immunotherapy alone; pseudoprogression rates were similar after SRT alone or in combination with immunotherapy or other systemic treatment. Oxford University Press 2019-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7213092/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdz014.072 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press, the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Le Rhun, Emilie
Wolpert, Fabian
Fialek, Maud
Devos, Patrick
Andratschke, Nicolaus
Reyns, Nicolas
Dummer, Reinhard
Mortier, Laurent
Weller, Michael
MLTI-13. RESPONSE ASSESSMENT OF MELANOMA BRAIN METASTASES TREATED BY STEREOTACTIC RADIOTHERAPY OR IMMUNOTHERAPY OR BOTH: A COMPARISON OF RECIST 1.1, RANO AND iRANO CRITERIA
title MLTI-13. RESPONSE ASSESSMENT OF MELANOMA BRAIN METASTASES TREATED BY STEREOTACTIC RADIOTHERAPY OR IMMUNOTHERAPY OR BOTH: A COMPARISON OF RECIST 1.1, RANO AND iRANO CRITERIA
title_full MLTI-13. RESPONSE ASSESSMENT OF MELANOMA BRAIN METASTASES TREATED BY STEREOTACTIC RADIOTHERAPY OR IMMUNOTHERAPY OR BOTH: A COMPARISON OF RECIST 1.1, RANO AND iRANO CRITERIA
title_fullStr MLTI-13. RESPONSE ASSESSMENT OF MELANOMA BRAIN METASTASES TREATED BY STEREOTACTIC RADIOTHERAPY OR IMMUNOTHERAPY OR BOTH: A COMPARISON OF RECIST 1.1, RANO AND iRANO CRITERIA
title_full_unstemmed MLTI-13. RESPONSE ASSESSMENT OF MELANOMA BRAIN METASTASES TREATED BY STEREOTACTIC RADIOTHERAPY OR IMMUNOTHERAPY OR BOTH: A COMPARISON OF RECIST 1.1, RANO AND iRANO CRITERIA
title_short MLTI-13. RESPONSE ASSESSMENT OF MELANOMA BRAIN METASTASES TREATED BY STEREOTACTIC RADIOTHERAPY OR IMMUNOTHERAPY OR BOTH: A COMPARISON OF RECIST 1.1, RANO AND iRANO CRITERIA
title_sort mlti-13. response assessment of melanoma brain metastases treated by stereotactic radiotherapy or immunotherapy or both: a comparison of recist 1.1, rano and irano criteria
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7213092/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdz014.072
work_keys_str_mv AT lerhunemilie mlti13responseassessmentofmelanomabrainmetastasestreatedbystereotacticradiotherapyorimmunotherapyorbothacomparisonofrecist11ranoandiranocriteria
AT wolpertfabian mlti13responseassessmentofmelanomabrainmetastasestreatedbystereotacticradiotherapyorimmunotherapyorbothacomparisonofrecist11ranoandiranocriteria
AT fialekmaud mlti13responseassessmentofmelanomabrainmetastasestreatedbystereotacticradiotherapyorimmunotherapyorbothacomparisonofrecist11ranoandiranocriteria
AT devospatrick mlti13responseassessmentofmelanomabrainmetastasestreatedbystereotacticradiotherapyorimmunotherapyorbothacomparisonofrecist11ranoandiranocriteria
AT andratschkenicolaus mlti13responseassessmentofmelanomabrainmetastasestreatedbystereotacticradiotherapyorimmunotherapyorbothacomparisonofrecist11ranoandiranocriteria
AT reynsnicolas mlti13responseassessmentofmelanomabrainmetastasestreatedbystereotacticradiotherapyorimmunotherapyorbothacomparisonofrecist11ranoandiranocriteria
AT dummerreinhard mlti13responseassessmentofmelanomabrainmetastasestreatedbystereotacticradiotherapyorimmunotherapyorbothacomparisonofrecist11ranoandiranocriteria
AT mortierlaurent mlti13responseassessmentofmelanomabrainmetastasestreatedbystereotacticradiotherapyorimmunotherapyorbothacomparisonofrecist11ranoandiranocriteria
AT wellermichael mlti13responseassessmentofmelanomabrainmetastasestreatedbystereotacticradiotherapyorimmunotherapyorbothacomparisonofrecist11ranoandiranocriteria