Cargando…
MLTI-13. RESPONSE ASSESSMENT OF MELANOMA BRAIN METASTASES TREATED BY STEREOTACTIC RADIOTHERAPY OR IMMUNOTHERAPY OR BOTH: A COMPARISON OF RECIST 1.1, RANO AND iRANO CRITERIA
BACKGROUND: The evaluation of response for brain metastases (BM) may be challenging in the context of treatment by stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) or immunotherapy or both. METHODS: We reviewed clinical and neuroimaging data of 62 melanoma patients with newly diagnosed BM treated by the combination...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7213092/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdz014.072 |
_version_ | 1783531727192326144 |
---|---|
author | Le Rhun, Emilie Wolpert, Fabian Fialek, Maud Devos, Patrick Andratschke, Nicolaus Reyns, Nicolas Dummer, Reinhard Mortier, Laurent Weller, Michael |
author_facet | Le Rhun, Emilie Wolpert, Fabian Fialek, Maud Devos, Patrick Andratschke, Nicolaus Reyns, Nicolas Dummer, Reinhard Mortier, Laurent Weller, Michael |
author_sort | Le Rhun, Emilie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The evaluation of response for brain metastases (BM) may be challenging in the context of treatment by stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) or immunotherapy or both. METHODS: We reviewed clinical and neuroimaging data of 62 melanoma patients with newly diagnosed BM treated by the combination of immunotherapy and SRT (n=33, group A), immunotherapy alone (n=10, group B) or SRT alone or in combination with other systemic therapies (n=19, group C). Response was assessed using RECIST 1.1, RANO or iRANO criteria. RESULTS: BRAF mutations were noted in 26 patients. 54 patients (87%) had 1–3 metastases. The median DS-GPA was 3. After a median follow-up of 30.5 months, 39 patients have experienced CNS progression, 16 (48.5%) in group A, 9 (90%) in group B, 14 (73.5%) in group C. Median PFS was 129.5 days (range 82–532) in group A, 75 days (range 35–203) in group B, 136 days (range 59–514) in group C. Forty-seven patients (76%) had died at the time of the analysis, 22 (66.5%) in group A, 7 (70%) in group B, 18 (94.5%) in group C. Median OS was 345 days (range 65–1824) in group A, 174.5 days (range 50–1361) in group B, 409 days (range 102–1244) in group C. 52 MRI scans were available for central review: pseudoprogression was documented in 9 patients (29%) in group A, 0 (0%) in group B, 5 (29.5%) in group C. Response rates were similar with all three sets of response criteria. Progressive disease was less often called when applying iRANO to assess SRT target lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the retrospective nature and the small sample size, these data may indicate that the omission of SRT from first-line treatment may compromise outcome. Pseudoprogression is uncommon with immunotherapy alone; pseudoprogression rates were similar after SRT alone or in combination with immunotherapy or other systemic treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7213092 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72130922020-07-07 MLTI-13. RESPONSE ASSESSMENT OF MELANOMA BRAIN METASTASES TREATED BY STEREOTACTIC RADIOTHERAPY OR IMMUNOTHERAPY OR BOTH: A COMPARISON OF RECIST 1.1, RANO AND iRANO CRITERIA Le Rhun, Emilie Wolpert, Fabian Fialek, Maud Devos, Patrick Andratschke, Nicolaus Reyns, Nicolas Dummer, Reinhard Mortier, Laurent Weller, Michael Neurooncol Adv Abstracts BACKGROUND: The evaluation of response for brain metastases (BM) may be challenging in the context of treatment by stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) or immunotherapy or both. METHODS: We reviewed clinical and neuroimaging data of 62 melanoma patients with newly diagnosed BM treated by the combination of immunotherapy and SRT (n=33, group A), immunotherapy alone (n=10, group B) or SRT alone or in combination with other systemic therapies (n=19, group C). Response was assessed using RECIST 1.1, RANO or iRANO criteria. RESULTS: BRAF mutations were noted in 26 patients. 54 patients (87%) had 1–3 metastases. The median DS-GPA was 3. After a median follow-up of 30.5 months, 39 patients have experienced CNS progression, 16 (48.5%) in group A, 9 (90%) in group B, 14 (73.5%) in group C. Median PFS was 129.5 days (range 82–532) in group A, 75 days (range 35–203) in group B, 136 days (range 59–514) in group C. Forty-seven patients (76%) had died at the time of the analysis, 22 (66.5%) in group A, 7 (70%) in group B, 18 (94.5%) in group C. Median OS was 345 days (range 65–1824) in group A, 174.5 days (range 50–1361) in group B, 409 days (range 102–1244) in group C. 52 MRI scans were available for central review: pseudoprogression was documented in 9 patients (29%) in group A, 0 (0%) in group B, 5 (29.5%) in group C. Response rates were similar with all three sets of response criteria. Progressive disease was less often called when applying iRANO to assess SRT target lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the retrospective nature and the small sample size, these data may indicate that the omission of SRT from first-line treatment may compromise outcome. Pseudoprogression is uncommon with immunotherapy alone; pseudoprogression rates were similar after SRT alone or in combination with immunotherapy or other systemic treatment. Oxford University Press 2019-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7213092/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdz014.072 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press, the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Le Rhun, Emilie Wolpert, Fabian Fialek, Maud Devos, Patrick Andratschke, Nicolaus Reyns, Nicolas Dummer, Reinhard Mortier, Laurent Weller, Michael MLTI-13. RESPONSE ASSESSMENT OF MELANOMA BRAIN METASTASES TREATED BY STEREOTACTIC RADIOTHERAPY OR IMMUNOTHERAPY OR BOTH: A COMPARISON OF RECIST 1.1, RANO AND iRANO CRITERIA |
title | MLTI-13. RESPONSE ASSESSMENT OF MELANOMA BRAIN METASTASES TREATED BY STEREOTACTIC RADIOTHERAPY OR IMMUNOTHERAPY OR BOTH: A COMPARISON OF RECIST 1.1, RANO AND iRANO CRITERIA |
title_full | MLTI-13. RESPONSE ASSESSMENT OF MELANOMA BRAIN METASTASES TREATED BY STEREOTACTIC RADIOTHERAPY OR IMMUNOTHERAPY OR BOTH: A COMPARISON OF RECIST 1.1, RANO AND iRANO CRITERIA |
title_fullStr | MLTI-13. RESPONSE ASSESSMENT OF MELANOMA BRAIN METASTASES TREATED BY STEREOTACTIC RADIOTHERAPY OR IMMUNOTHERAPY OR BOTH: A COMPARISON OF RECIST 1.1, RANO AND iRANO CRITERIA |
title_full_unstemmed | MLTI-13. RESPONSE ASSESSMENT OF MELANOMA BRAIN METASTASES TREATED BY STEREOTACTIC RADIOTHERAPY OR IMMUNOTHERAPY OR BOTH: A COMPARISON OF RECIST 1.1, RANO AND iRANO CRITERIA |
title_short | MLTI-13. RESPONSE ASSESSMENT OF MELANOMA BRAIN METASTASES TREATED BY STEREOTACTIC RADIOTHERAPY OR IMMUNOTHERAPY OR BOTH: A COMPARISON OF RECIST 1.1, RANO AND iRANO CRITERIA |
title_sort | mlti-13. response assessment of melanoma brain metastases treated by stereotactic radiotherapy or immunotherapy or both: a comparison of recist 1.1, rano and irano criteria |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7213092/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdz014.072 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lerhunemilie mlti13responseassessmentofmelanomabrainmetastasestreatedbystereotacticradiotherapyorimmunotherapyorbothacomparisonofrecist11ranoandiranocriteria AT wolpertfabian mlti13responseassessmentofmelanomabrainmetastasestreatedbystereotacticradiotherapyorimmunotherapyorbothacomparisonofrecist11ranoandiranocriteria AT fialekmaud mlti13responseassessmentofmelanomabrainmetastasestreatedbystereotacticradiotherapyorimmunotherapyorbothacomparisonofrecist11ranoandiranocriteria AT devospatrick mlti13responseassessmentofmelanomabrainmetastasestreatedbystereotacticradiotherapyorimmunotherapyorbothacomparisonofrecist11ranoandiranocriteria AT andratschkenicolaus mlti13responseassessmentofmelanomabrainmetastasestreatedbystereotacticradiotherapyorimmunotherapyorbothacomparisonofrecist11ranoandiranocriteria AT reynsnicolas mlti13responseassessmentofmelanomabrainmetastasestreatedbystereotacticradiotherapyorimmunotherapyorbothacomparisonofrecist11ranoandiranocriteria AT dummerreinhard mlti13responseassessmentofmelanomabrainmetastasestreatedbystereotacticradiotherapyorimmunotherapyorbothacomparisonofrecist11ranoandiranocriteria AT mortierlaurent mlti13responseassessmentofmelanomabrainmetastasestreatedbystereotacticradiotherapyorimmunotherapyorbothacomparisonofrecist11ranoandiranocriteria AT wellermichael mlti13responseassessmentofmelanomabrainmetastasestreatedbystereotacticradiotherapyorimmunotherapyorbothacomparisonofrecist11ranoandiranocriteria |