Cargando…

ML-07 R-MPV-A THERAPY FOR PRIMARY CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM LYMPHOMA IN THE ELDERLY: OUTCOME AND PROBLEM

PURPOSE: R-MPV-A therapy has recently been reported to improve the outcomes of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). Our patients have received R-MPV-A therapy since 2017 and elderly patients have only been treated with whole brain radiotherapy when they do not show a complete response af...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fudaba, Hirotaka, Momii, Yasutomo, Onishi, Kouhei, Asou, Daigo, Fujiki, Minoru
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7213124/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdz039.149
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: R-MPV-A therapy has recently been reported to improve the outcomes of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). Our patients have received R-MPV-A therapy since 2017 and elderly patients have only been treated with whole brain radiotherapy when they do not show a complete response after induction chemotherapy. We report the therapeutic outcomes and problems of elderly PCNSL patients treated with R-PMV-A. MATERIALS & METHODS: Eight newly diagnosed PCNSL patients received R-MPV therapy from September 2017 to June 2019. We retrospectively reviewed the cycles of R-MPV therapy, radiotherapy, consolidation high-dose Ara-C (HD-Ara-C) therapy, and the G8 score (a geriatric assessment). RESULTS: Patients were divided into three groups: Group A (71–75 years; n=2), Group B (76–80 years; n=4), and Group C (>81 years; n=2). All Group A patients finished 5 cycles of R-MPV therapy, showed a complete response, and underwent consolidation HD-Ara-C therapy. Two Group B patients showed a complete response on R-MPV therapy. One of the other patients showed a partial response after 3 cycles of R-MPV therapy, and a >3 kg reduction in body weight. The patient’s G8 score was 12 points. Whole brain radiotherapy (23.4 Gy) was administered followed by local radiotherapy (21.6 Gy). One patient showed a partial response after 7 cycles of R-MPV therapy and started radiotherapy. One Group C patient received radiotherapy after 3 cycles of R-MPV because of a new lesion. The other Group C patient showed acute renal damage after 3 cycles of R-MPV. CONCLUSION: R-MPV-A therapy was relatively safe for our elderly PCNSL patients. Notably, patients >76 years of age sometimes had severe adverse effect with increased R-MPV cycles. A promising therapeutic strategy based on age and geriatric assessment is needed.