Cargando…

RADI-26. DOSIMETRIC EVALUATION OF 6 MV VERSUS 10 MV PHOTONS FOR HIPPOCAMPAL AVOIDANCE WHOLE BRAIN RADIOTHERAPY

OBJECTIVE: Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) causes neurocognitive decline. Hippocampal avoidance WBRT (HA-WBRT) reduces hippocampal irradiation, potentially mitigating neurocognitive sequelae. We compared hippocampal and brain dosimetry with HA-WBRT with 6 megavoltage (MV) versus 10 MV photon energie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Julie, Diana, Mahase, Sean, No, Diana, Salah, Khaled, Knisely, Jonathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7213183/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdz014.118
_version_ 1783531748572790784
author Julie, Diana
Mahase, Sean
No, Diana
Salah, Khaled
Knisely, Jonathan
author_facet Julie, Diana
Mahase, Sean
No, Diana
Salah, Khaled
Knisely, Jonathan
author_sort Julie, Diana
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) causes neurocognitive decline. Hippocampal avoidance WBRT (HA-WBRT) reduces hippocampal irradiation, potentially mitigating neurocognitive sequelae. We compared hippocampal and brain dosimetry with HA-WBRT with 6 megavoltage (MV) versus 10 MV photon energies. METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients treated with WBRT were retrospectively replanned with HA-WBRT techniques using 6 MV and 10 MV photons. Coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy was employed, with a prescription dose of 3000 cGy in 10 fractions. Planning was done with Eclipse version 13.6 or 15.6. Nine patients were planned with 2.5 mm multileaf collimator leaves, with the remainder planned with 5 mm leaves. The hippocampi were contoured and a HA structure was generated using a uniform 5 mm expansion. A planning target volume (PTV) was defined as the brain parenchyma minus the HA structure. NRG-CC001 dose constraints were used. For each variable, descriptive statistics were calculated. Comparisons were made using two-tailed Wilcoxon signed rank tests or paired t-tests. RESULTS: The minimum hippocampal dose (D100%) was improved with 6 MV plans, 841 cGy compared to 914 cGy with 10 MV (p< 0.005). The maximum hippocampal dose (D0.03cc) was reduced with 6 MV planning, 1614 cGy versus 1676 cGy for 10 MV (p< 0.0001). With 6 MV photons, a greater number of plans met NRG-CC001 constraints without deviations. 6 MV photons improved PTV coverage by the 95% isodose line, 96.6% compared to 95.9% for 10 MV (p=0.021). 6 MV photon plans decreased the volume of PTV receiving ≥105% of the prescription, 84.2% versus 87.9% for 10 MV (p=0.006). The mean dose, hot spots, and cold spots did not differ by photon energy. PTV dose constraints were always met. CONCLUSION: 6 MV photon HA-WBRT plans are dosimetrically superior to 10 MV, reducing hippocampal radiation dose, without compromise in brain coverage and improved target dose homogeneity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7213183
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72131832020-07-07 RADI-26. DOSIMETRIC EVALUATION OF 6 MV VERSUS 10 MV PHOTONS FOR HIPPOCAMPAL AVOIDANCE WHOLE BRAIN RADIOTHERAPY Julie, Diana Mahase, Sean No, Diana Salah, Khaled Knisely, Jonathan Neurooncol Adv Abstracts OBJECTIVE: Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) causes neurocognitive decline. Hippocampal avoidance WBRT (HA-WBRT) reduces hippocampal irradiation, potentially mitigating neurocognitive sequelae. We compared hippocampal and brain dosimetry with HA-WBRT with 6 megavoltage (MV) versus 10 MV photon energies. METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients treated with WBRT were retrospectively replanned with HA-WBRT techniques using 6 MV and 10 MV photons. Coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy was employed, with a prescription dose of 3000 cGy in 10 fractions. Planning was done with Eclipse version 13.6 or 15.6. Nine patients were planned with 2.5 mm multileaf collimator leaves, with the remainder planned with 5 mm leaves. The hippocampi were contoured and a HA structure was generated using a uniform 5 mm expansion. A planning target volume (PTV) was defined as the brain parenchyma minus the HA structure. NRG-CC001 dose constraints were used. For each variable, descriptive statistics were calculated. Comparisons were made using two-tailed Wilcoxon signed rank tests or paired t-tests. RESULTS: The minimum hippocampal dose (D100%) was improved with 6 MV plans, 841 cGy compared to 914 cGy with 10 MV (p< 0.005). The maximum hippocampal dose (D0.03cc) was reduced with 6 MV planning, 1614 cGy versus 1676 cGy for 10 MV (p< 0.0001). With 6 MV photons, a greater number of plans met NRG-CC001 constraints without deviations. 6 MV photons improved PTV coverage by the 95% isodose line, 96.6% compared to 95.9% for 10 MV (p=0.021). 6 MV photon plans decreased the volume of PTV receiving ≥105% of the prescription, 84.2% versus 87.9% for 10 MV (p=0.006). The mean dose, hot spots, and cold spots did not differ by photon energy. PTV dose constraints were always met. CONCLUSION: 6 MV photon HA-WBRT plans are dosimetrically superior to 10 MV, reducing hippocampal radiation dose, without compromise in brain coverage and improved target dose homogeneity. Oxford University Press 2019-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7213183/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdz014.118 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press, the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Julie, Diana
Mahase, Sean
No, Diana
Salah, Khaled
Knisely, Jonathan
RADI-26. DOSIMETRIC EVALUATION OF 6 MV VERSUS 10 MV PHOTONS FOR HIPPOCAMPAL AVOIDANCE WHOLE BRAIN RADIOTHERAPY
title RADI-26. DOSIMETRIC EVALUATION OF 6 MV VERSUS 10 MV PHOTONS FOR HIPPOCAMPAL AVOIDANCE WHOLE BRAIN RADIOTHERAPY
title_full RADI-26. DOSIMETRIC EVALUATION OF 6 MV VERSUS 10 MV PHOTONS FOR HIPPOCAMPAL AVOIDANCE WHOLE BRAIN RADIOTHERAPY
title_fullStr RADI-26. DOSIMETRIC EVALUATION OF 6 MV VERSUS 10 MV PHOTONS FOR HIPPOCAMPAL AVOIDANCE WHOLE BRAIN RADIOTHERAPY
title_full_unstemmed RADI-26. DOSIMETRIC EVALUATION OF 6 MV VERSUS 10 MV PHOTONS FOR HIPPOCAMPAL AVOIDANCE WHOLE BRAIN RADIOTHERAPY
title_short RADI-26. DOSIMETRIC EVALUATION OF 6 MV VERSUS 10 MV PHOTONS FOR HIPPOCAMPAL AVOIDANCE WHOLE BRAIN RADIOTHERAPY
title_sort radi-26. dosimetric evaluation of 6 mv versus 10 mv photons for hippocampal avoidance whole brain radiotherapy
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7213183/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdz014.118
work_keys_str_mv AT juliediana radi26dosimetricevaluationof6mvversus10mvphotonsforhippocampalavoidancewholebrainradiotherapy
AT mahasesean radi26dosimetricevaluationof6mvversus10mvphotonsforhippocampalavoidancewholebrainradiotherapy
AT nodiana radi26dosimetricevaluationof6mvversus10mvphotonsforhippocampalavoidancewholebrainradiotherapy
AT salahkhaled radi26dosimetricevaluationof6mvversus10mvphotonsforhippocampalavoidancewholebrainradiotherapy
AT kniselyjonathan radi26dosimetricevaluationof6mvversus10mvphotonsforhippocampalavoidancewholebrainradiotherapy