Cargando…

RADI-35. AN ANALYSIS OF RESPONSE ENDPOINTS FOR BRAIN METASTASIS PATIENTS TREATED WITH STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY AND PD(L)-1 INHIBITORS

PURPOSE: Recent trials have evaluated the role of anti-PD(L)-1 inhibitors alone in patients with newly diagnosed brain metastasis, resulting in a suggested paradigm shift. In the absence of randomized comparisons, an evaluation of outcomes for similar patients treated with radiotherapy are needed to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kotecha, Rupesh, Miller, Jacob, Kim, Joseph, Juloori, Aditya, Chao, Samuel, Murphy, Erin, Peereboom, David, Mohammadi, Alireza, Barnett, Gene, Vogelbaum, Michael, Angelov, Lilyana, Suh, John, Ahluwalia, Manmeet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7213256/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdz014.127
_version_ 1783531765153923072
author Kotecha, Rupesh
Miller, Jacob
Kim, Joseph
Juloori, Aditya
Chao, Samuel
Murphy, Erin
Peereboom, David
Mohammadi, Alireza
Barnett, Gene
Vogelbaum, Michael
Angelov, Lilyana
Suh, John
Ahluwalia, Manmeet
author_facet Kotecha, Rupesh
Miller, Jacob
Kim, Joseph
Juloori, Aditya
Chao, Samuel
Murphy, Erin
Peereboom, David
Mohammadi, Alireza
Barnett, Gene
Vogelbaum, Michael
Angelov, Lilyana
Suh, John
Ahluwalia, Manmeet
author_sort Kotecha, Rupesh
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Recent trials have evaluated the role of anti-PD(L)-1 inhibitors alone in patients with newly diagnosed brain metastasis, resulting in a suggested paradigm shift. In the absence of randomized comparisons, an evaluation of outcomes for similar patients treated with radiotherapy are needed to provide baseline comparative data. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients diagnosed with brain metastasis from 2010–2017 at a single tertiary care institution who received SRS and at least one anti-PD(L)-1 inhibitor. Primary endpoints included the rate of best intracranial response (either a complete [CR] or partial response [PR]), rate of intracranial benefit (percentage of patients with stable disease [SD] for at least 6 months), and overall objective response rates. RESULTS: 150 patients met the eligibility criteria for this study and the median follow-up time was 10 months (Range: 1–130 months). Only a minority of patients from this cohort would have been eligible for comparative systemic therapy alone trials: 8 (CheckMate 204, CM), 8 (ABC), and 50 patients (Yale Institutional trial, YI). Best intracranial objective response rates for these trial eligible patients were 64% (CM), 64% (ABC), and 72% (YI), respectively. The 6-month rates of intracranial benefit across patients were 75% (CM), 75% (ABC), and 93% (YI), respectively. The rates of either a CR, PR, or SD across trial eligible patients were 100% (CM), 100% (ABC), and 94% (YI), respectively. More than 50% of patients experienced out-of-field progression in each of the patient subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Over a seven year period, very few patients treated with SRS and anti-PD(L)-1 inhibitor therapy in a busy academic practice would have been eligible for systemic therapy alone per trial eligibility criteria. In these highly favorable subgroups, patients experience high rates of objective response, best intracranial response, and intracranial benefit after SRS and anti-PD(L)-1 therapy, representing optimal brain metastasis management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7213256
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72132562020-07-07 RADI-35. AN ANALYSIS OF RESPONSE ENDPOINTS FOR BRAIN METASTASIS PATIENTS TREATED WITH STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY AND PD(L)-1 INHIBITORS Kotecha, Rupesh Miller, Jacob Kim, Joseph Juloori, Aditya Chao, Samuel Murphy, Erin Peereboom, David Mohammadi, Alireza Barnett, Gene Vogelbaum, Michael Angelov, Lilyana Suh, John Ahluwalia, Manmeet Neurooncol Adv Abstracts PURPOSE: Recent trials have evaluated the role of anti-PD(L)-1 inhibitors alone in patients with newly diagnosed brain metastasis, resulting in a suggested paradigm shift. In the absence of randomized comparisons, an evaluation of outcomes for similar patients treated with radiotherapy are needed to provide baseline comparative data. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients diagnosed with brain metastasis from 2010–2017 at a single tertiary care institution who received SRS and at least one anti-PD(L)-1 inhibitor. Primary endpoints included the rate of best intracranial response (either a complete [CR] or partial response [PR]), rate of intracranial benefit (percentage of patients with stable disease [SD] for at least 6 months), and overall objective response rates. RESULTS: 150 patients met the eligibility criteria for this study and the median follow-up time was 10 months (Range: 1–130 months). Only a minority of patients from this cohort would have been eligible for comparative systemic therapy alone trials: 8 (CheckMate 204, CM), 8 (ABC), and 50 patients (Yale Institutional trial, YI). Best intracranial objective response rates for these trial eligible patients were 64% (CM), 64% (ABC), and 72% (YI), respectively. The 6-month rates of intracranial benefit across patients were 75% (CM), 75% (ABC), and 93% (YI), respectively. The rates of either a CR, PR, or SD across trial eligible patients were 100% (CM), 100% (ABC), and 94% (YI), respectively. More than 50% of patients experienced out-of-field progression in each of the patient subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Over a seven year period, very few patients treated with SRS and anti-PD(L)-1 inhibitor therapy in a busy academic practice would have been eligible for systemic therapy alone per trial eligibility criteria. In these highly favorable subgroups, patients experience high rates of objective response, best intracranial response, and intracranial benefit after SRS and anti-PD(L)-1 therapy, representing optimal brain metastasis management. Oxford University Press 2019-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7213256/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdz014.127 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press, the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Kotecha, Rupesh
Miller, Jacob
Kim, Joseph
Juloori, Aditya
Chao, Samuel
Murphy, Erin
Peereboom, David
Mohammadi, Alireza
Barnett, Gene
Vogelbaum, Michael
Angelov, Lilyana
Suh, John
Ahluwalia, Manmeet
RADI-35. AN ANALYSIS OF RESPONSE ENDPOINTS FOR BRAIN METASTASIS PATIENTS TREATED WITH STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY AND PD(L)-1 INHIBITORS
title RADI-35. AN ANALYSIS OF RESPONSE ENDPOINTS FOR BRAIN METASTASIS PATIENTS TREATED WITH STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY AND PD(L)-1 INHIBITORS
title_full RADI-35. AN ANALYSIS OF RESPONSE ENDPOINTS FOR BRAIN METASTASIS PATIENTS TREATED WITH STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY AND PD(L)-1 INHIBITORS
title_fullStr RADI-35. AN ANALYSIS OF RESPONSE ENDPOINTS FOR BRAIN METASTASIS PATIENTS TREATED WITH STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY AND PD(L)-1 INHIBITORS
title_full_unstemmed RADI-35. AN ANALYSIS OF RESPONSE ENDPOINTS FOR BRAIN METASTASIS PATIENTS TREATED WITH STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY AND PD(L)-1 INHIBITORS
title_short RADI-35. AN ANALYSIS OF RESPONSE ENDPOINTS FOR BRAIN METASTASIS PATIENTS TREATED WITH STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY AND PD(L)-1 INHIBITORS
title_sort radi-35. an analysis of response endpoints for brain metastasis patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery and pd(l)-1 inhibitors
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7213256/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdz014.127
work_keys_str_mv AT kotecharupesh radi35ananalysisofresponseendpointsforbrainmetastasispatientstreatedwithstereotacticradiosurgeryandpdl1inhibitors
AT millerjacob radi35ananalysisofresponseendpointsforbrainmetastasispatientstreatedwithstereotacticradiosurgeryandpdl1inhibitors
AT kimjoseph radi35ananalysisofresponseendpointsforbrainmetastasispatientstreatedwithstereotacticradiosurgeryandpdl1inhibitors
AT julooriaditya radi35ananalysisofresponseendpointsforbrainmetastasispatientstreatedwithstereotacticradiosurgeryandpdl1inhibitors
AT chaosamuel radi35ananalysisofresponseendpointsforbrainmetastasispatientstreatedwithstereotacticradiosurgeryandpdl1inhibitors
AT murphyerin radi35ananalysisofresponseendpointsforbrainmetastasispatientstreatedwithstereotacticradiosurgeryandpdl1inhibitors
AT peereboomdavid radi35ananalysisofresponseendpointsforbrainmetastasispatientstreatedwithstereotacticradiosurgeryandpdl1inhibitors
AT mohammadialireza radi35ananalysisofresponseendpointsforbrainmetastasispatientstreatedwithstereotacticradiosurgeryandpdl1inhibitors
AT barnettgene radi35ananalysisofresponseendpointsforbrainmetastasispatientstreatedwithstereotacticradiosurgeryandpdl1inhibitors
AT vogelbaummichael radi35ananalysisofresponseendpointsforbrainmetastasispatientstreatedwithstereotacticradiosurgeryandpdl1inhibitors
AT angelovlilyana radi35ananalysisofresponseendpointsforbrainmetastasispatientstreatedwithstereotacticradiosurgeryandpdl1inhibitors
AT suhjohn radi35ananalysisofresponseendpointsforbrainmetastasispatientstreatedwithstereotacticradiosurgeryandpdl1inhibitors
AT ahluwaliamanmeet radi35ananalysisofresponseendpointsforbrainmetastasispatientstreatedwithstereotacticradiosurgeryandpdl1inhibitors