Cargando…
SURG-11. THE ROLE OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE-GUIDED LASER ABLATION FOR INTRACRANIAL METASTATIC TUMORS
INTRODUCTION: Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is a novel, minimally-invasive adjuvant therapy that is well-suited for intracranial tumors in deep or critical areas, recurrences failing standard therapy, and poor open-surgical candidates. To better characterize safety and clinical outcomes,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7213383/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdz014.146 |
_version_ | 1783531791979642880 |
---|---|
author | Semonche, Alexa Eichberg, Daniel Theodotou, Christian Shah, Ashish Banerjee, Christopher Berger, Michael Wallo, Amanda Komotar, Ricardo Ivan, Michael |
author_facet | Semonche, Alexa Eichberg, Daniel Theodotou, Christian Shah, Ashish Banerjee, Christopher Berger, Michael Wallo, Amanda Komotar, Ricardo Ivan, Michael |
author_sort | Semonche, Alexa |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is a novel, minimally-invasive adjuvant therapy that is well-suited for intracranial tumors in deep or critical areas, recurrences failing standard therapy, and poor open-surgical candidates. To better characterize safety and clinical outcomes, we present the largest single-institutional experience with LITT for recurrent brain metastases. METHODS: All patients undergoing LITT for single recurrent brain metastases from 2013–2018 at the University of Miami were included in this study. Primary outcomes included extent of ablation (EOA), time-to-recurrence (TTR), and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints include neurologic status and complication rate. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to quantify TTR and OS, compare outcomes by primary tumor of origin, and identify potential predictors of TTR and OS. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients underwent 44 LITT procedures; all had undergone prior treatment with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Mean age was 56.8 years and 83.3% were female. Average pretreatment tumor volume was 6.6cm3. Patients were treated with a mean ablation dose of 12.4W (9.8-14W), achieving a median EOA of 100% (range 55–100%). At median follow-up of 11.6 months (IQR 4.6–19.1 months), 34 of 44 (87.3%) cases had tumor control on radiographic imaging and 22 of 36 (61.1%) of patients remain alive. Median TTR was 55.9 months; median OS was 25.5 months. Neither TTR nor OR differed significantly by primary tumor of origin (P >.05). EOA >88% predicted longer TTR (P=.01) Neurologic status was stable or improved in all surviving patients. No major complications occurred (0% rate). CONCLUSIONS: Our institutional experience demonstrates LITT is safe for intracranial metastases resistant to SRS and offers several advantages over open surgical treatment. TTR and OS were not associated with primary tumor of origin. A threshold EOA >88% predicted longer TTR. Randomized studies are needed to evaluate the role of LITT as a treatment adjunct. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7213383 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72133832020-07-07 SURG-11. THE ROLE OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE-GUIDED LASER ABLATION FOR INTRACRANIAL METASTATIC TUMORS Semonche, Alexa Eichberg, Daniel Theodotou, Christian Shah, Ashish Banerjee, Christopher Berger, Michael Wallo, Amanda Komotar, Ricardo Ivan, Michael Neurooncol Adv Abstracts INTRODUCTION: Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is a novel, minimally-invasive adjuvant therapy that is well-suited for intracranial tumors in deep or critical areas, recurrences failing standard therapy, and poor open-surgical candidates. To better characterize safety and clinical outcomes, we present the largest single-institutional experience with LITT for recurrent brain metastases. METHODS: All patients undergoing LITT for single recurrent brain metastases from 2013–2018 at the University of Miami were included in this study. Primary outcomes included extent of ablation (EOA), time-to-recurrence (TTR), and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints include neurologic status and complication rate. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to quantify TTR and OS, compare outcomes by primary tumor of origin, and identify potential predictors of TTR and OS. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients underwent 44 LITT procedures; all had undergone prior treatment with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Mean age was 56.8 years and 83.3% were female. Average pretreatment tumor volume was 6.6cm3. Patients were treated with a mean ablation dose of 12.4W (9.8-14W), achieving a median EOA of 100% (range 55–100%). At median follow-up of 11.6 months (IQR 4.6–19.1 months), 34 of 44 (87.3%) cases had tumor control on radiographic imaging and 22 of 36 (61.1%) of patients remain alive. Median TTR was 55.9 months; median OS was 25.5 months. Neither TTR nor OR differed significantly by primary tumor of origin (P >.05). EOA >88% predicted longer TTR (P=.01) Neurologic status was stable or improved in all surviving patients. No major complications occurred (0% rate). CONCLUSIONS: Our institutional experience demonstrates LITT is safe for intracranial metastases resistant to SRS and offers several advantages over open surgical treatment. TTR and OS were not associated with primary tumor of origin. A threshold EOA >88% predicted longer TTR. Randomized studies are needed to evaluate the role of LITT as a treatment adjunct. Oxford University Press 2019-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7213383/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdz014.146 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press, the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Semonche, Alexa Eichberg, Daniel Theodotou, Christian Shah, Ashish Banerjee, Christopher Berger, Michael Wallo, Amanda Komotar, Ricardo Ivan, Michael SURG-11. THE ROLE OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE-GUIDED LASER ABLATION FOR INTRACRANIAL METASTATIC TUMORS |
title | SURG-11. THE ROLE OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE-GUIDED LASER ABLATION FOR INTRACRANIAL METASTATIC TUMORS |
title_full | SURG-11. THE ROLE OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE-GUIDED LASER ABLATION FOR INTRACRANIAL METASTATIC TUMORS |
title_fullStr | SURG-11. THE ROLE OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE-GUIDED LASER ABLATION FOR INTRACRANIAL METASTATIC TUMORS |
title_full_unstemmed | SURG-11. THE ROLE OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE-GUIDED LASER ABLATION FOR INTRACRANIAL METASTATIC TUMORS |
title_short | SURG-11. THE ROLE OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE-GUIDED LASER ABLATION FOR INTRACRANIAL METASTATIC TUMORS |
title_sort | surg-11. the role of magnetic resonance-guided laser ablation for intracranial metastatic tumors |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7213383/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdz014.146 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT semonchealexa surg11theroleofmagneticresonanceguidedlaserablationforintracranialmetastatictumors AT eichbergdaniel surg11theroleofmagneticresonanceguidedlaserablationforintracranialmetastatictumors AT theodotouchristian surg11theroleofmagneticresonanceguidedlaserablationforintracranialmetastatictumors AT shahashish surg11theroleofmagneticresonanceguidedlaserablationforintracranialmetastatictumors AT banerjeechristopher surg11theroleofmagneticresonanceguidedlaserablationforintracranialmetastatictumors AT bergermichael surg11theroleofmagneticresonanceguidedlaserablationforintracranialmetastatictumors AT walloamanda surg11theroleofmagneticresonanceguidedlaserablationforintracranialmetastatictumors AT komotarricardo surg11theroleofmagneticresonanceguidedlaserablationforintracranialmetastatictumors AT ivanmichael surg11theroleofmagneticresonanceguidedlaserablationforintracranialmetastatictumors |