Cargando…

Requests for futile treatments: what mechanisms play a role? Results of a qualitative study among Dutch physicians

OBJECTIVES: Overtreatment is increasingly seen as a challenge in clinical practice and can lead to unnecessary interventions, poor healthcare outcomes and increasing costs. However, little is known as to what exactly causes overtreatment. In 2015, the Royal Dutch Medical Association (RDMA) attempted...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Bruchem-Visser, Rozemarijn Lidewij, van Dijk, Gert, Mattace Raso, Francesco, de Beaufort, Inez
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7213846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32350017
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035675
_version_ 1783531865295028224
author van Bruchem-Visser, Rozemarijn Lidewij
van Dijk, Gert
Mattace Raso, Francesco
de Beaufort, Inez
author_facet van Bruchem-Visser, Rozemarijn Lidewij
van Dijk, Gert
Mattace Raso, Francesco
de Beaufort, Inez
author_sort van Bruchem-Visser, Rozemarijn Lidewij
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Overtreatment is increasingly seen as a challenge in clinical practice and can lead to unnecessary interventions, poor healthcare outcomes and increasing costs. However, little is known as to what exactly causes overtreatment. In 2015, the Royal Dutch Medical Association (RDMA) attempted to address this problem and distinguished several mechanisms that were thought to drive overtreatment. In 14 qualitative interviews among Dutch physicians, we investigated which mechanisms played a role in decision-making and whether all mechanisms were considered equally important. DESIGN: We asked physicians to present a case from personal experience, in which the patient or family requested continuing treatment against the advice of the physician. PARTICIPANTS: Fourteen physicians from five different medical areas agreed to participate. SETTING: Interviews were held face-to-face at the workplace of the physician. RESULTS: Three closely related mechanisms were mentioned most frequently as drivers of overtreatment, as perceived by the physician: ‘death is not a common topic of conversation’, ‘‘never give up’ is the default attitude in our society’ and ‘patients’ culture and outlook on life influences their perception of death’. The mechanism ‘medical view taking priority’ was mentioned to be an inhibitor of overtreatment. CONCLUSIONS: Of the 15 mechanisms described by the report of the Steering Committee of the RDMA, not all mechanisms were mentioned as driving overtreatment. Three mechanisms were mentioned most as being a driver of overtreatment (‘death is not a common topic of conversation’; ‘‘never give up’ is the default attitude in our society’' and ‘patients’ culture and outlook on life influences their perception of death’), some played no role at all, and others were considered to be inhibitors of overtreatment, especially the mechanism ‘medical view taking priority’.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7213846
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72138462020-05-14 Requests for futile treatments: what mechanisms play a role? Results of a qualitative study among Dutch physicians van Bruchem-Visser, Rozemarijn Lidewij van Dijk, Gert Mattace Raso, Francesco de Beaufort, Inez BMJ Open Qualitative Research OBJECTIVES: Overtreatment is increasingly seen as a challenge in clinical practice and can lead to unnecessary interventions, poor healthcare outcomes and increasing costs. However, little is known as to what exactly causes overtreatment. In 2015, the Royal Dutch Medical Association (RDMA) attempted to address this problem and distinguished several mechanisms that were thought to drive overtreatment. In 14 qualitative interviews among Dutch physicians, we investigated which mechanisms played a role in decision-making and whether all mechanisms were considered equally important. DESIGN: We asked physicians to present a case from personal experience, in which the patient or family requested continuing treatment against the advice of the physician. PARTICIPANTS: Fourteen physicians from five different medical areas agreed to participate. SETTING: Interviews were held face-to-face at the workplace of the physician. RESULTS: Three closely related mechanisms were mentioned most frequently as drivers of overtreatment, as perceived by the physician: ‘death is not a common topic of conversation’, ‘‘never give up’ is the default attitude in our society’ and ‘patients’ culture and outlook on life influences their perception of death’. The mechanism ‘medical view taking priority’ was mentioned to be an inhibitor of overtreatment. CONCLUSIONS: Of the 15 mechanisms described by the report of the Steering Committee of the RDMA, not all mechanisms were mentioned as driving overtreatment. Three mechanisms were mentioned most as being a driver of overtreatment (‘death is not a common topic of conversation’; ‘‘never give up’ is the default attitude in our society’' and ‘patients’ culture and outlook on life influences their perception of death’), some played no role at all, and others were considered to be inhibitors of overtreatment, especially the mechanism ‘medical view taking priority’. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7213846/ /pubmed/32350017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035675 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Qualitative Research
van Bruchem-Visser, Rozemarijn Lidewij
van Dijk, Gert
Mattace Raso, Francesco
de Beaufort, Inez
Requests for futile treatments: what mechanisms play a role? Results of a qualitative study among Dutch physicians
title Requests for futile treatments: what mechanisms play a role? Results of a qualitative study among Dutch physicians
title_full Requests for futile treatments: what mechanisms play a role? Results of a qualitative study among Dutch physicians
title_fullStr Requests for futile treatments: what mechanisms play a role? Results of a qualitative study among Dutch physicians
title_full_unstemmed Requests for futile treatments: what mechanisms play a role? Results of a qualitative study among Dutch physicians
title_short Requests for futile treatments: what mechanisms play a role? Results of a qualitative study among Dutch physicians
title_sort requests for futile treatments: what mechanisms play a role? results of a qualitative study among dutch physicians
topic Qualitative Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7213846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32350017
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035675
work_keys_str_mv AT vanbruchemvisserrozemarijnlidewij requestsforfutiletreatmentswhatmechanismsplayaroleresultsofaqualitativestudyamongdutchphysicians
AT vandijkgert requestsforfutiletreatmentswhatmechanismsplayaroleresultsofaqualitativestudyamongdutchphysicians
AT mattacerasofrancesco requestsforfutiletreatmentswhatmechanismsplayaroleresultsofaqualitativestudyamongdutchphysicians
AT debeaufortinez requestsforfutiletreatmentswhatmechanismsplayaroleresultsofaqualitativestudyamongdutchphysicians