Cargando…
Long-term efficacy and safety of first-line ibrutinib treatment for patients with CLL/SLL: 5 years of follow-up from the phase 3 RESONATE-2 study
RESONATE-2 is a phase 3 study of first-line ibrutinib versus chlorambucil in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). Patients aged ≥65 years (n = 269) were randomized 1:1 to once-daily ibrutinib 420 mg continuously or chlorambucil 0.5–0.8 mg/kg for ≤12 cycles. With a med...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7214263/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31628428 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41375-019-0602-x |
_version_ | 1783531930257457152 |
---|---|
author | Burger, Jan A. Barr, Paul M. Robak, Tadeusz Owen, Carolyn Ghia, Paolo Tedeschi, Alessandra Bairey, Osnat Hillmen, Peter Coutre, Steven E. Devereux, Stephen Grosicki, Sebastian McCarthy, Helen Simpson, David Offner, Fritz Moreno, Carol Dai, Sandra Lal, Indu Dean, James P. Kipps, Thomas J. |
author_facet | Burger, Jan A. Barr, Paul M. Robak, Tadeusz Owen, Carolyn Ghia, Paolo Tedeschi, Alessandra Bairey, Osnat Hillmen, Peter Coutre, Steven E. Devereux, Stephen Grosicki, Sebastian McCarthy, Helen Simpson, David Offner, Fritz Moreno, Carol Dai, Sandra Lal, Indu Dean, James P. Kipps, Thomas J. |
author_sort | Burger, Jan A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | RESONATE-2 is a phase 3 study of first-line ibrutinib versus chlorambucil in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). Patients aged ≥65 years (n = 269) were randomized 1:1 to once-daily ibrutinib 420 mg continuously or chlorambucil 0.5–0.8 mg/kg for ≤12 cycles. With a median (range) follow-up of 60 months (0.1–66), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) benefits for ibrutinib versus chlorambucil were sustained (PFS estimates at 5 years: 70% vs 12%; HR [95% CI]: 0.146 [0.098–0.218]; OS estimates at 5 years: 83% vs 68%; HR [95% CI]: 0.450 [0.266–0.761]). Ibrutinib benefit was also consistent in patients with high prognostic risk (TP53 mutation, 11q deletion, and/or unmutated IGHV) (PFS: HR [95% CI]: 0.083 [0.047–0.145]; OS: HR [95% CI]: 0.366 [0.181–0.736]). Investigator-assessed overall response rate was 92% with ibrutinib (complete response, 30%; 11% at primary analysis). Common grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) included neutropenia (13%), pneumonia (12%), hypertension (8%), anemia (7%), and hyponatremia (6%); occurrence of most events as well as discontinuations due to AEs decreased over time. Fifty-eight percent of patients continue to receive ibrutinib. Single-agent ibrutinib demonstrated sustained PFS and OS benefit versus chlorambucil and increased depth of response over time. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7214263 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72142632020-05-14 Long-term efficacy and safety of first-line ibrutinib treatment for patients with CLL/SLL: 5 years of follow-up from the phase 3 RESONATE-2 study Burger, Jan A. Barr, Paul M. Robak, Tadeusz Owen, Carolyn Ghia, Paolo Tedeschi, Alessandra Bairey, Osnat Hillmen, Peter Coutre, Steven E. Devereux, Stephen Grosicki, Sebastian McCarthy, Helen Simpson, David Offner, Fritz Moreno, Carol Dai, Sandra Lal, Indu Dean, James P. Kipps, Thomas J. Leukemia Article RESONATE-2 is a phase 3 study of first-line ibrutinib versus chlorambucil in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). Patients aged ≥65 years (n = 269) were randomized 1:1 to once-daily ibrutinib 420 mg continuously or chlorambucil 0.5–0.8 mg/kg for ≤12 cycles. With a median (range) follow-up of 60 months (0.1–66), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) benefits for ibrutinib versus chlorambucil were sustained (PFS estimates at 5 years: 70% vs 12%; HR [95% CI]: 0.146 [0.098–0.218]; OS estimates at 5 years: 83% vs 68%; HR [95% CI]: 0.450 [0.266–0.761]). Ibrutinib benefit was also consistent in patients with high prognostic risk (TP53 mutation, 11q deletion, and/or unmutated IGHV) (PFS: HR [95% CI]: 0.083 [0.047–0.145]; OS: HR [95% CI]: 0.366 [0.181–0.736]). Investigator-assessed overall response rate was 92% with ibrutinib (complete response, 30%; 11% at primary analysis). Common grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) included neutropenia (13%), pneumonia (12%), hypertension (8%), anemia (7%), and hyponatremia (6%); occurrence of most events as well as discontinuations due to AEs decreased over time. Fifty-eight percent of patients continue to receive ibrutinib. Single-agent ibrutinib demonstrated sustained PFS and OS benefit versus chlorambucil and increased depth of response over time. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-10-18 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7214263/ /pubmed/31628428 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41375-019-0602-x Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Burger, Jan A. Barr, Paul M. Robak, Tadeusz Owen, Carolyn Ghia, Paolo Tedeschi, Alessandra Bairey, Osnat Hillmen, Peter Coutre, Steven E. Devereux, Stephen Grosicki, Sebastian McCarthy, Helen Simpson, David Offner, Fritz Moreno, Carol Dai, Sandra Lal, Indu Dean, James P. Kipps, Thomas J. Long-term efficacy and safety of first-line ibrutinib treatment for patients with CLL/SLL: 5 years of follow-up from the phase 3 RESONATE-2 study |
title | Long-term efficacy and safety of first-line ibrutinib treatment for patients with CLL/SLL: 5 years of follow-up from the phase 3 RESONATE-2 study |
title_full | Long-term efficacy and safety of first-line ibrutinib treatment for patients with CLL/SLL: 5 years of follow-up from the phase 3 RESONATE-2 study |
title_fullStr | Long-term efficacy and safety of first-line ibrutinib treatment for patients with CLL/SLL: 5 years of follow-up from the phase 3 RESONATE-2 study |
title_full_unstemmed | Long-term efficacy and safety of first-line ibrutinib treatment for patients with CLL/SLL: 5 years of follow-up from the phase 3 RESONATE-2 study |
title_short | Long-term efficacy and safety of first-line ibrutinib treatment for patients with CLL/SLL: 5 years of follow-up from the phase 3 RESONATE-2 study |
title_sort | long-term efficacy and safety of first-line ibrutinib treatment for patients with cll/sll: 5 years of follow-up from the phase 3 resonate-2 study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7214263/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31628428 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41375-019-0602-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT burgerjana longtermefficacyandsafetyoffirstlineibrutinibtreatmentforpatientswithcllsll5yearsoffollowupfromthephase3resonate2study AT barrpaulm longtermefficacyandsafetyoffirstlineibrutinibtreatmentforpatientswithcllsll5yearsoffollowupfromthephase3resonate2study AT robaktadeusz longtermefficacyandsafetyoffirstlineibrutinibtreatmentforpatientswithcllsll5yearsoffollowupfromthephase3resonate2study AT owencarolyn longtermefficacyandsafetyoffirstlineibrutinibtreatmentforpatientswithcllsll5yearsoffollowupfromthephase3resonate2study AT ghiapaolo longtermefficacyandsafetyoffirstlineibrutinibtreatmentforpatientswithcllsll5yearsoffollowupfromthephase3resonate2study AT tedeschialessandra longtermefficacyandsafetyoffirstlineibrutinibtreatmentforpatientswithcllsll5yearsoffollowupfromthephase3resonate2study AT baireyosnat longtermefficacyandsafetyoffirstlineibrutinibtreatmentforpatientswithcllsll5yearsoffollowupfromthephase3resonate2study AT hillmenpeter longtermefficacyandsafetyoffirstlineibrutinibtreatmentforpatientswithcllsll5yearsoffollowupfromthephase3resonate2study AT coutrestevene longtermefficacyandsafetyoffirstlineibrutinibtreatmentforpatientswithcllsll5yearsoffollowupfromthephase3resonate2study AT devereuxstephen longtermefficacyandsafetyoffirstlineibrutinibtreatmentforpatientswithcllsll5yearsoffollowupfromthephase3resonate2study AT grosickisebastian longtermefficacyandsafetyoffirstlineibrutinibtreatmentforpatientswithcllsll5yearsoffollowupfromthephase3resonate2study AT mccarthyhelen longtermefficacyandsafetyoffirstlineibrutinibtreatmentforpatientswithcllsll5yearsoffollowupfromthephase3resonate2study AT simpsondavid longtermefficacyandsafetyoffirstlineibrutinibtreatmentforpatientswithcllsll5yearsoffollowupfromthephase3resonate2study AT offnerfritz longtermefficacyandsafetyoffirstlineibrutinibtreatmentforpatientswithcllsll5yearsoffollowupfromthephase3resonate2study AT morenocarol longtermefficacyandsafetyoffirstlineibrutinibtreatmentforpatientswithcllsll5yearsoffollowupfromthephase3resonate2study AT daisandra longtermefficacyandsafetyoffirstlineibrutinibtreatmentforpatientswithcllsll5yearsoffollowupfromthephase3resonate2study AT lalindu longtermefficacyandsafetyoffirstlineibrutinibtreatmentforpatientswithcllsll5yearsoffollowupfromthephase3resonate2study AT deanjamesp longtermefficacyandsafetyoffirstlineibrutinibtreatmentforpatientswithcllsll5yearsoffollowupfromthephase3resonate2study AT kippsthomasj longtermefficacyandsafetyoffirstlineibrutinibtreatmentforpatientswithcllsll5yearsoffollowupfromthephase3resonate2study |