Cargando…
The use of endoluminal techniques in the revision of primary bariatric surgery procedures: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: Weight regain following primary bariatric surgery is attributed to anatomical, behavioural and hormonal factors. Dilation of the gastrojejunal anastomosis is a possible cause of weight regain after roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). However, surgical revision has significant risks with lim...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7214483/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32112253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07468-w |
_version_ | 1783531981502414848 |
---|---|
author | Goh, Yan Mei James, Nicole Ellen Goh, En Lin Khanna, Achal |
author_facet | Goh, Yan Mei James, Nicole Ellen Goh, En Lin Khanna, Achal |
author_sort | Goh, Yan Mei |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Weight regain following primary bariatric surgery is attributed to anatomical, behavioural and hormonal factors. Dilation of the gastrojejunal anastomosis is a possible cause of weight regain after roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). However, surgical revision has significant risks with limited benefits. Endoluminal procedures have been suggested to manage weight regain post-surgery. This systematic review aims to assess efficacy of endoluminal procedures. METHODS: Studies where endoluminal procedures were performed following primary bariatric surgery were identified. Main outcome measures were mean weight loss pre- and post-procedure, excess weight loss, recurrence rates, success rates and post-procedure complications. RESULTS: Twenty-six studies were included in this review. Procedures identified were (i) endoluminal plication devices (ii) other techniques e.g. sclerotherapy, mucosal ablation, and Argon Plasma Coagulation (APC) and (iii) combination therapy involving sclerotherapy/mucosal ablation/APC and endoscopic OverStitch device. Endoluminal plication devices show greatest initial weight loss within 12 months post-procedure, but not sustained at 18 months. Only one study utilising sclerotherapy showed greater sustained weight loss with peak EWL (19.9%) at 18 months follow-up. Combination therapy showed the greatest sustained EWL (36.4%) at 18 months. Endoluminal plication devices were more successfully performed in 91.8% of patients and had lower recurrence rates (5.02%) compared to sclerotherapy and APC, with 46.8% success and 21.5% recurrence rates. Both procedures demonstrate no major complications and low rates of moderate complications. Only mild complications were noted for combination therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The paucity of good quality data limits our ability to demonstrate and support the long-term efficacy of endoluminal techniques in the management of weight regain following primary bariatric surgery. Future work is necessary to not only clarify the role of endoluminal plication devices, but also combination therapy in the management of weight regain following primary bariatric surgery. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00464-020-07468-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7214483 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72144832020-05-14 The use of endoluminal techniques in the revision of primary bariatric surgery procedures: a systematic review Goh, Yan Mei James, Nicole Ellen Goh, En Lin Khanna, Achal Surg Endosc Review Article BACKGROUND: Weight regain following primary bariatric surgery is attributed to anatomical, behavioural and hormonal factors. Dilation of the gastrojejunal anastomosis is a possible cause of weight regain after roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). However, surgical revision has significant risks with limited benefits. Endoluminal procedures have been suggested to manage weight regain post-surgery. This systematic review aims to assess efficacy of endoluminal procedures. METHODS: Studies where endoluminal procedures were performed following primary bariatric surgery were identified. Main outcome measures were mean weight loss pre- and post-procedure, excess weight loss, recurrence rates, success rates and post-procedure complications. RESULTS: Twenty-six studies were included in this review. Procedures identified were (i) endoluminal plication devices (ii) other techniques e.g. sclerotherapy, mucosal ablation, and Argon Plasma Coagulation (APC) and (iii) combination therapy involving sclerotherapy/mucosal ablation/APC and endoscopic OverStitch device. Endoluminal plication devices show greatest initial weight loss within 12 months post-procedure, but not sustained at 18 months. Only one study utilising sclerotherapy showed greater sustained weight loss with peak EWL (19.9%) at 18 months follow-up. Combination therapy showed the greatest sustained EWL (36.4%) at 18 months. Endoluminal plication devices were more successfully performed in 91.8% of patients and had lower recurrence rates (5.02%) compared to sclerotherapy and APC, with 46.8% success and 21.5% recurrence rates. Both procedures demonstrate no major complications and low rates of moderate complications. Only mild complications were noted for combination therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The paucity of good quality data limits our ability to demonstrate and support the long-term efficacy of endoluminal techniques in the management of weight regain following primary bariatric surgery. Future work is necessary to not only clarify the role of endoluminal plication devices, but also combination therapy in the management of weight regain following primary bariatric surgery. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00464-020-07468-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2020-02-28 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7214483/ /pubmed/32112253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07468-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020, corrected publication 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Goh, Yan Mei James, Nicole Ellen Goh, En Lin Khanna, Achal The use of endoluminal techniques in the revision of primary bariatric surgery procedures: a systematic review |
title | The use of endoluminal techniques in the revision of primary bariatric surgery procedures: a systematic review |
title_full | The use of endoluminal techniques in the revision of primary bariatric surgery procedures: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | The use of endoluminal techniques in the revision of primary bariatric surgery procedures: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | The use of endoluminal techniques in the revision of primary bariatric surgery procedures: a systematic review |
title_short | The use of endoluminal techniques in the revision of primary bariatric surgery procedures: a systematic review |
title_sort | use of endoluminal techniques in the revision of primary bariatric surgery procedures: a systematic review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7214483/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32112253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07468-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gohyanmei theuseofendoluminaltechniquesintherevisionofprimarybariatricsurgeryproceduresasystematicreview AT jamesnicoleellen theuseofendoluminaltechniquesintherevisionofprimarybariatricsurgeryproceduresasystematicreview AT gohenlin theuseofendoluminaltechniquesintherevisionofprimarybariatricsurgeryproceduresasystematicreview AT khannaachal theuseofendoluminaltechniquesintherevisionofprimarybariatricsurgeryproceduresasystematicreview AT gohyanmei useofendoluminaltechniquesintherevisionofprimarybariatricsurgeryproceduresasystematicreview AT jamesnicoleellen useofendoluminaltechniquesintherevisionofprimarybariatricsurgeryproceduresasystematicreview AT gohenlin useofendoluminaltechniquesintherevisionofprimarybariatricsurgeryproceduresasystematicreview AT khannaachal useofendoluminaltechniquesintherevisionofprimarybariatricsurgeryproceduresasystematicreview |