Cargando…

Making Better Dose Decisions: Using Exposure‐Response Modeling to Integrate Efficacy Outcome of Two Phase IIb Clinical Trials of Ubrogepant for Migraine Treatment

Ubrogepant (MK‐1602) is a novel, oral, calcitonin gene‐related peptide receptor antagonist in clinical development with positive phase III outcomes for acute treatment of migraine. This paper describes the population exposure‐response (E‐R) modeling and simulations, which were used to inform the pha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Chi‐Chung, Voss, Tiffini, Kowalski, Ken, Yang, Bei, Kleijn, Huub Jan, Jones, Christopher J., Bosch, Rolien, Michelson, David, DeAngelis, Matthew, Xu, Yang, Xie, Iris, Kothare, Prajakti A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7214662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31758661
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cts.12730
_version_ 1783532014849228800
author Li, Chi‐Chung
Voss, Tiffini
Kowalski, Ken
Yang, Bei
Kleijn, Huub Jan
Jones, Christopher J.
Bosch, Rolien
Michelson, David
DeAngelis, Matthew
Xu, Yang
Xie, Iris
Kothare, Prajakti A.
author_facet Li, Chi‐Chung
Voss, Tiffini
Kowalski, Ken
Yang, Bei
Kleijn, Huub Jan
Jones, Christopher J.
Bosch, Rolien
Michelson, David
DeAngelis, Matthew
Xu, Yang
Xie, Iris
Kothare, Prajakti A.
author_sort Li, Chi‐Chung
collection PubMed
description Ubrogepant (MK‐1602) is a novel, oral, calcitonin gene‐related peptide receptor antagonist in clinical development with positive phase III outcomes for acute treatment of migraine. This paper describes the population exposure‐response (E‐R) modeling and simulations, which were used to inform the phase III dose‐selection rationale, based on ~ 800 participants pooled across two phase IIb randomized dose‐finding clinical trials. The E‐R model describes the placebo and ubrogepant treatment effects based on migraine pain end points (2‐hour pain relief and 2‐hour pain freedom) at various dose levels. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate various assumptions of placebo response in light of the high placebo response observed in one phase II trial. A population pharmacokinetic model describing the effect of formulations was included in the E‐R simulation framework to assess potential dose implications of a formulation switch from phase II to phase III. Model‐based simulations predict that a dose of 25 mg or higher is likely to achieve significantly better efficacy than placebo with desirable efficacy levels. The understanding of E‐R helped support the dose selection for the phase III clinical trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7214662
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72146622020-05-13 Making Better Dose Decisions: Using Exposure‐Response Modeling to Integrate Efficacy Outcome of Two Phase IIb Clinical Trials of Ubrogepant for Migraine Treatment Li, Chi‐Chung Voss, Tiffini Kowalski, Ken Yang, Bei Kleijn, Huub Jan Jones, Christopher J. Bosch, Rolien Michelson, David DeAngelis, Matthew Xu, Yang Xie, Iris Kothare, Prajakti A. Clin Transl Sci Research Ubrogepant (MK‐1602) is a novel, oral, calcitonin gene‐related peptide receptor antagonist in clinical development with positive phase III outcomes for acute treatment of migraine. This paper describes the population exposure‐response (E‐R) modeling and simulations, which were used to inform the phase III dose‐selection rationale, based on ~ 800 participants pooled across two phase IIb randomized dose‐finding clinical trials. The E‐R model describes the placebo and ubrogepant treatment effects based on migraine pain end points (2‐hour pain relief and 2‐hour pain freedom) at various dose levels. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate various assumptions of placebo response in light of the high placebo response observed in one phase II trial. A population pharmacokinetic model describing the effect of formulations was included in the E‐R simulation framework to assess potential dose implications of a formulation switch from phase II to phase III. Model‐based simulations predict that a dose of 25 mg or higher is likely to achieve significantly better efficacy than placebo with desirable efficacy levels. The understanding of E‐R helped support the dose selection for the phase III clinical trials. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-01-16 2020-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7214662/ /pubmed/31758661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cts.12730 Text en © 2019 Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. Clinical and Translational Science published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American Society of Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research
Li, Chi‐Chung
Voss, Tiffini
Kowalski, Ken
Yang, Bei
Kleijn, Huub Jan
Jones, Christopher J.
Bosch, Rolien
Michelson, David
DeAngelis, Matthew
Xu, Yang
Xie, Iris
Kothare, Prajakti A.
Making Better Dose Decisions: Using Exposure‐Response Modeling to Integrate Efficacy Outcome of Two Phase IIb Clinical Trials of Ubrogepant for Migraine Treatment
title Making Better Dose Decisions: Using Exposure‐Response Modeling to Integrate Efficacy Outcome of Two Phase IIb Clinical Trials of Ubrogepant for Migraine Treatment
title_full Making Better Dose Decisions: Using Exposure‐Response Modeling to Integrate Efficacy Outcome of Two Phase IIb Clinical Trials of Ubrogepant for Migraine Treatment
title_fullStr Making Better Dose Decisions: Using Exposure‐Response Modeling to Integrate Efficacy Outcome of Two Phase IIb Clinical Trials of Ubrogepant for Migraine Treatment
title_full_unstemmed Making Better Dose Decisions: Using Exposure‐Response Modeling to Integrate Efficacy Outcome of Two Phase IIb Clinical Trials of Ubrogepant for Migraine Treatment
title_short Making Better Dose Decisions: Using Exposure‐Response Modeling to Integrate Efficacy Outcome of Two Phase IIb Clinical Trials of Ubrogepant for Migraine Treatment
title_sort making better dose decisions: using exposure‐response modeling to integrate efficacy outcome of two phase iib clinical trials of ubrogepant for migraine treatment
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7214662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31758661
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cts.12730
work_keys_str_mv AT lichichung makingbetterdosedecisionsusingexposureresponsemodelingtointegrateefficacyoutcomeoftwophaseiibclinicaltrialsofubrogepantformigrainetreatment
AT vosstiffini makingbetterdosedecisionsusingexposureresponsemodelingtointegrateefficacyoutcomeoftwophaseiibclinicaltrialsofubrogepantformigrainetreatment
AT kowalskiken makingbetterdosedecisionsusingexposureresponsemodelingtointegrateefficacyoutcomeoftwophaseiibclinicaltrialsofubrogepantformigrainetreatment
AT yangbei makingbetterdosedecisionsusingexposureresponsemodelingtointegrateefficacyoutcomeoftwophaseiibclinicaltrialsofubrogepantformigrainetreatment
AT kleijnhuubjan makingbetterdosedecisionsusingexposureresponsemodelingtointegrateefficacyoutcomeoftwophaseiibclinicaltrialsofubrogepantformigrainetreatment
AT joneschristopherj makingbetterdosedecisionsusingexposureresponsemodelingtointegrateefficacyoutcomeoftwophaseiibclinicaltrialsofubrogepantformigrainetreatment
AT boschrolien makingbetterdosedecisionsusingexposureresponsemodelingtointegrateefficacyoutcomeoftwophaseiibclinicaltrialsofubrogepantformigrainetreatment
AT michelsondavid makingbetterdosedecisionsusingexposureresponsemodelingtointegrateefficacyoutcomeoftwophaseiibclinicaltrialsofubrogepantformigrainetreatment
AT deangelismatthew makingbetterdosedecisionsusingexposureresponsemodelingtointegrateefficacyoutcomeoftwophaseiibclinicaltrialsofubrogepantformigrainetreatment
AT xuyang makingbetterdosedecisionsusingexposureresponsemodelingtointegrateefficacyoutcomeoftwophaseiibclinicaltrialsofubrogepantformigrainetreatment
AT xieiris makingbetterdosedecisionsusingexposureresponsemodelingtointegrateefficacyoutcomeoftwophaseiibclinicaltrialsofubrogepantformigrainetreatment
AT kothareprajaktia makingbetterdosedecisionsusingexposureresponsemodelingtointegrateefficacyoutcomeoftwophaseiibclinicaltrialsofubrogepantformigrainetreatment