Cargando…
Gray Matter Covariance Networks as Classifiers and Predictors of Cognitive Function in Alzheimer’s Disease
The study of shared variation in gray matter morphology may define neurodegenerative diseases beyond what can be detected from the isolated assessment of regional brain volumes. We, therefore, aimed to (1) identify SCNs (structural covariance networks) that discriminate between Alzheimer’s disease (...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7214682/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32431629 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00360 |
_version_ | 1783532019634929664 |
---|---|
author | Wagner, Fabian Duering, Marco Gesierich, Benno G. Enzinger, Christian Ropele, Stefan Dal-Bianco, Peter Mayer, Florian Schmidt, Reinhold Koini, Marisa |
author_facet | Wagner, Fabian Duering, Marco Gesierich, Benno G. Enzinger, Christian Ropele, Stefan Dal-Bianco, Peter Mayer, Florian Schmidt, Reinhold Koini, Marisa |
author_sort | Wagner, Fabian |
collection | PubMed |
description | The study of shared variation in gray matter morphology may define neurodegenerative diseases beyond what can be detected from the isolated assessment of regional brain volumes. We, therefore, aimed to (1) identify SCNs (structural covariance networks) that discriminate between Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients and healthy controls (HC), (2) investigate their diagnostic accuracy in comparison and above established markers, and (3) determine if they are associated with cognitive abilities. We applied a random forest algorithm to identify discriminating networks from a set of 20 SCNs. The algorithm was trained on a main sample of 104 AD patients and 104 age-matched HC and was then validated in an independent sample of 28 AD patients and 28 controls from another center. Only two of the 20 SCNs contributed significantly to the discrimination between AD and controls. These were a temporal and a secondary somatosensory SCN. Their diagnostic accuracy was 74% in the original cohort and 80% in the independent samples. The diagnostic accuracy of SCNs was comparable with that of conventional volumetric MRI markers including whole brain volume and hippocampal volume. SCN did not significantly increase diagnostic accuracy beyond that of conventional MRI markers. We found the temporal SCN to be associated with verbal memory at baseline. No other associations with cognitive functions were seen. SCNs failed to predict the course of cognitive decline over an average of 18 months. We conclude that SCNs have diagnostic potential, but the diagnostic information gain beyond conventional MRI markers is limited. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7214682 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72146822020-05-19 Gray Matter Covariance Networks as Classifiers and Predictors of Cognitive Function in Alzheimer’s Disease Wagner, Fabian Duering, Marco Gesierich, Benno G. Enzinger, Christian Ropele, Stefan Dal-Bianco, Peter Mayer, Florian Schmidt, Reinhold Koini, Marisa Front Psychiatry Psychiatry The study of shared variation in gray matter morphology may define neurodegenerative diseases beyond what can be detected from the isolated assessment of regional brain volumes. We, therefore, aimed to (1) identify SCNs (structural covariance networks) that discriminate between Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients and healthy controls (HC), (2) investigate their diagnostic accuracy in comparison and above established markers, and (3) determine if they are associated with cognitive abilities. We applied a random forest algorithm to identify discriminating networks from a set of 20 SCNs. The algorithm was trained on a main sample of 104 AD patients and 104 age-matched HC and was then validated in an independent sample of 28 AD patients and 28 controls from another center. Only two of the 20 SCNs contributed significantly to the discrimination between AD and controls. These were a temporal and a secondary somatosensory SCN. Their diagnostic accuracy was 74% in the original cohort and 80% in the independent samples. The diagnostic accuracy of SCNs was comparable with that of conventional volumetric MRI markers including whole brain volume and hippocampal volume. SCN did not significantly increase diagnostic accuracy beyond that of conventional MRI markers. We found the temporal SCN to be associated with verbal memory at baseline. No other associations with cognitive functions were seen. SCNs failed to predict the course of cognitive decline over an average of 18 months. We conclude that SCNs have diagnostic potential, but the diagnostic information gain beyond conventional MRI markers is limited. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7214682/ /pubmed/32431629 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00360 Text en Copyright © 2020 Wagner, Duering, Gesierich, Enzinger, Ropele, Dal-Bianco, Mayer, Schmidt and Koini http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychiatry Wagner, Fabian Duering, Marco Gesierich, Benno G. Enzinger, Christian Ropele, Stefan Dal-Bianco, Peter Mayer, Florian Schmidt, Reinhold Koini, Marisa Gray Matter Covariance Networks as Classifiers and Predictors of Cognitive Function in Alzheimer’s Disease |
title | Gray Matter Covariance Networks as Classifiers and Predictors of Cognitive Function in Alzheimer’s Disease |
title_full | Gray Matter Covariance Networks as Classifiers and Predictors of Cognitive Function in Alzheimer’s Disease |
title_fullStr | Gray Matter Covariance Networks as Classifiers and Predictors of Cognitive Function in Alzheimer’s Disease |
title_full_unstemmed | Gray Matter Covariance Networks as Classifiers and Predictors of Cognitive Function in Alzheimer’s Disease |
title_short | Gray Matter Covariance Networks as Classifiers and Predictors of Cognitive Function in Alzheimer’s Disease |
title_sort | gray matter covariance networks as classifiers and predictors of cognitive function in alzheimer’s disease |
topic | Psychiatry |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7214682/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32431629 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00360 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wagnerfabian graymattercovariancenetworksasclassifiersandpredictorsofcognitivefunctioninalzheimersdisease AT dueringmarco graymattercovariancenetworksasclassifiersandpredictorsofcognitivefunctioninalzheimersdisease AT gesierichbennog graymattercovariancenetworksasclassifiersandpredictorsofcognitivefunctioninalzheimersdisease AT enzingerchristian graymattercovariancenetworksasclassifiersandpredictorsofcognitivefunctioninalzheimersdisease AT ropelestefan graymattercovariancenetworksasclassifiersandpredictorsofcognitivefunctioninalzheimersdisease AT dalbiancopeter graymattercovariancenetworksasclassifiersandpredictorsofcognitivefunctioninalzheimersdisease AT mayerflorian graymattercovariancenetworksasclassifiersandpredictorsofcognitivefunctioninalzheimersdisease AT schmidtreinhold graymattercovariancenetworksasclassifiersandpredictorsofcognitivefunctioninalzheimersdisease AT koinimarisa graymattercovariancenetworksasclassifiersandpredictorsofcognitivefunctioninalzheimersdisease |