Cargando…

Gray Matter Covariance Networks as Classifiers and Predictors of Cognitive Function in Alzheimer’s Disease

The study of shared variation in gray matter morphology may define neurodegenerative diseases beyond what can be detected from the isolated assessment of regional brain volumes. We, therefore, aimed to (1) identify SCNs (structural covariance networks) that discriminate between Alzheimer’s disease (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wagner, Fabian, Duering, Marco, Gesierich, Benno G., Enzinger, Christian, Ropele, Stefan, Dal-Bianco, Peter, Mayer, Florian, Schmidt, Reinhold, Koini, Marisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7214682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32431629
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00360
_version_ 1783532019634929664
author Wagner, Fabian
Duering, Marco
Gesierich, Benno G.
Enzinger, Christian
Ropele, Stefan
Dal-Bianco, Peter
Mayer, Florian
Schmidt, Reinhold
Koini, Marisa
author_facet Wagner, Fabian
Duering, Marco
Gesierich, Benno G.
Enzinger, Christian
Ropele, Stefan
Dal-Bianco, Peter
Mayer, Florian
Schmidt, Reinhold
Koini, Marisa
author_sort Wagner, Fabian
collection PubMed
description The study of shared variation in gray matter morphology may define neurodegenerative diseases beyond what can be detected from the isolated assessment of regional brain volumes. We, therefore, aimed to (1) identify SCNs (structural covariance networks) that discriminate between Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients and healthy controls (HC), (2) investigate their diagnostic accuracy in comparison and above established markers, and (3) determine if they are associated with cognitive abilities. We applied a random forest algorithm to identify discriminating networks from a set of 20 SCNs. The algorithm was trained on a main sample of 104 AD patients and 104 age-matched HC and was then validated in an independent sample of 28 AD patients and 28 controls from another center. Only two of the 20 SCNs contributed significantly to the discrimination between AD and controls. These were a temporal and a secondary somatosensory SCN. Their diagnostic accuracy was 74% in the original cohort and 80% in the independent samples. The diagnostic accuracy of SCNs was comparable with that of conventional volumetric MRI markers including whole brain volume and hippocampal volume. SCN did not significantly increase diagnostic accuracy beyond that of conventional MRI markers. We found the temporal SCN to be associated with verbal memory at baseline. No other associations with cognitive functions were seen. SCNs failed to predict the course of cognitive decline over an average of 18 months. We conclude that SCNs have diagnostic potential, but the diagnostic information gain beyond conventional MRI markers is limited.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7214682
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72146822020-05-19 Gray Matter Covariance Networks as Classifiers and Predictors of Cognitive Function in Alzheimer’s Disease Wagner, Fabian Duering, Marco Gesierich, Benno G. Enzinger, Christian Ropele, Stefan Dal-Bianco, Peter Mayer, Florian Schmidt, Reinhold Koini, Marisa Front Psychiatry Psychiatry The study of shared variation in gray matter morphology may define neurodegenerative diseases beyond what can be detected from the isolated assessment of regional brain volumes. We, therefore, aimed to (1) identify SCNs (structural covariance networks) that discriminate between Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients and healthy controls (HC), (2) investigate their diagnostic accuracy in comparison and above established markers, and (3) determine if they are associated with cognitive abilities. We applied a random forest algorithm to identify discriminating networks from a set of 20 SCNs. The algorithm was trained on a main sample of 104 AD patients and 104 age-matched HC and was then validated in an independent sample of 28 AD patients and 28 controls from another center. Only two of the 20 SCNs contributed significantly to the discrimination between AD and controls. These were a temporal and a secondary somatosensory SCN. Their diagnostic accuracy was 74% in the original cohort and 80% in the independent samples. The diagnostic accuracy of SCNs was comparable with that of conventional volumetric MRI markers including whole brain volume and hippocampal volume. SCN did not significantly increase diagnostic accuracy beyond that of conventional MRI markers. We found the temporal SCN to be associated with verbal memory at baseline. No other associations with cognitive functions were seen. SCNs failed to predict the course of cognitive decline over an average of 18 months. We conclude that SCNs have diagnostic potential, but the diagnostic information gain beyond conventional MRI markers is limited. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7214682/ /pubmed/32431629 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00360 Text en Copyright © 2020 Wagner, Duering, Gesierich, Enzinger, Ropele, Dal-Bianco, Mayer, Schmidt and Koini http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Wagner, Fabian
Duering, Marco
Gesierich, Benno G.
Enzinger, Christian
Ropele, Stefan
Dal-Bianco, Peter
Mayer, Florian
Schmidt, Reinhold
Koini, Marisa
Gray Matter Covariance Networks as Classifiers and Predictors of Cognitive Function in Alzheimer’s Disease
title Gray Matter Covariance Networks as Classifiers and Predictors of Cognitive Function in Alzheimer’s Disease
title_full Gray Matter Covariance Networks as Classifiers and Predictors of Cognitive Function in Alzheimer’s Disease
title_fullStr Gray Matter Covariance Networks as Classifiers and Predictors of Cognitive Function in Alzheimer’s Disease
title_full_unstemmed Gray Matter Covariance Networks as Classifiers and Predictors of Cognitive Function in Alzheimer’s Disease
title_short Gray Matter Covariance Networks as Classifiers and Predictors of Cognitive Function in Alzheimer’s Disease
title_sort gray matter covariance networks as classifiers and predictors of cognitive function in alzheimer’s disease
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7214682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32431629
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00360
work_keys_str_mv AT wagnerfabian graymattercovariancenetworksasclassifiersandpredictorsofcognitivefunctioninalzheimersdisease
AT dueringmarco graymattercovariancenetworksasclassifiersandpredictorsofcognitivefunctioninalzheimersdisease
AT gesierichbennog graymattercovariancenetworksasclassifiersandpredictorsofcognitivefunctioninalzheimersdisease
AT enzingerchristian graymattercovariancenetworksasclassifiersandpredictorsofcognitivefunctioninalzheimersdisease
AT ropelestefan graymattercovariancenetworksasclassifiersandpredictorsofcognitivefunctioninalzheimersdisease
AT dalbiancopeter graymattercovariancenetworksasclassifiersandpredictorsofcognitivefunctioninalzheimersdisease
AT mayerflorian graymattercovariancenetworksasclassifiersandpredictorsofcognitivefunctioninalzheimersdisease
AT schmidtreinhold graymattercovariancenetworksasclassifiersandpredictorsofcognitivefunctioninalzheimersdisease
AT koinimarisa graymattercovariancenetworksasclassifiersandpredictorsofcognitivefunctioninalzheimersdisease