Cargando…

Difference in Perfusion Parameters Between Gastric Cancer and Gastric Stromal Tumors: Evaluation With Oral Contrast Plus Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography

Objective: To explore the difference of perfusion parameters between gastric cancer (GC) and gastric stromal tumors (GSTs) by using oral contrast plus contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (OC+CEUS). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 149 patients with histologically confirmed gastric lesions (80 pati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Xiaohua, Kou, Hongju, He, Huiliao, Lu, Mingdong, Zhou, Lingling, Wang, Liang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7214801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32432030
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00532
_version_ 1783532047285878784
author Wang, Xiaohua
Kou, Hongju
He, Huiliao
Lu, Mingdong
Zhou, Lingling
Wang, Liang
author_facet Wang, Xiaohua
Kou, Hongju
He, Huiliao
Lu, Mingdong
Zhou, Lingling
Wang, Liang
author_sort Wang, Xiaohua
collection PubMed
description Objective: To explore the difference of perfusion parameters between gastric cancer (GC) and gastric stromal tumors (GSTs) by using oral contrast plus contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (OC+CEUS). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 149 patients with histologically confirmed gastric lesions (80 patients with GC and 69 patients with GST). OC+CEUS was performed in all patients in the GC group and the GST group before surgery. The cine loops of OC+CEUS of all cases were analyzed. The perfusion parameters including arrival time (AT), time to peak (TTP), basal intensity (BI), and peak intensity (PI) were obtained via a program designed for autotracking contrast quantification (ACQ). The between-group differences in these parameters were compared. Results: According to time-intensity curve (TIC) analysis, high-risk GST had higher PI than low-risk GST (P < 0.05). GC had faster AT and higher PI than normal gastric wall (P < 0.05); GST had higher PI than normal gastric wall (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the GC group had faster AT and higher PI than the GST group (P < 0.05). In contrast, the difference in BI and peak time (TTP) between the groups was not significant (P > 0.05). Conclusion: AT and PI differ significantly between the GC group and the GST group. As a new method, OC+CEUS has value for the differential diagnosis of GC and GST.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7214801
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72148012020-05-19 Difference in Perfusion Parameters Between Gastric Cancer and Gastric Stromal Tumors: Evaluation With Oral Contrast Plus Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography Wang, Xiaohua Kou, Hongju He, Huiliao Lu, Mingdong Zhou, Lingling Wang, Liang Front Oncol Oncology Objective: To explore the difference of perfusion parameters between gastric cancer (GC) and gastric stromal tumors (GSTs) by using oral contrast plus contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (OC+CEUS). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 149 patients with histologically confirmed gastric lesions (80 patients with GC and 69 patients with GST). OC+CEUS was performed in all patients in the GC group and the GST group before surgery. The cine loops of OC+CEUS of all cases were analyzed. The perfusion parameters including arrival time (AT), time to peak (TTP), basal intensity (BI), and peak intensity (PI) were obtained via a program designed for autotracking contrast quantification (ACQ). The between-group differences in these parameters were compared. Results: According to time-intensity curve (TIC) analysis, high-risk GST had higher PI than low-risk GST (P < 0.05). GC had faster AT and higher PI than normal gastric wall (P < 0.05); GST had higher PI than normal gastric wall (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the GC group had faster AT and higher PI than the GST group (P < 0.05). In contrast, the difference in BI and peak time (TTP) between the groups was not significant (P > 0.05). Conclusion: AT and PI differ significantly between the GC group and the GST group. As a new method, OC+CEUS has value for the differential diagnosis of GC and GST. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7214801/ /pubmed/32432030 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00532 Text en Copyright © 2020 Wang, Kou, He, Lu, Zhou and Wang. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Wang, Xiaohua
Kou, Hongju
He, Huiliao
Lu, Mingdong
Zhou, Lingling
Wang, Liang
Difference in Perfusion Parameters Between Gastric Cancer and Gastric Stromal Tumors: Evaluation With Oral Contrast Plus Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography
title Difference in Perfusion Parameters Between Gastric Cancer and Gastric Stromal Tumors: Evaluation With Oral Contrast Plus Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography
title_full Difference in Perfusion Parameters Between Gastric Cancer and Gastric Stromal Tumors: Evaluation With Oral Contrast Plus Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography
title_fullStr Difference in Perfusion Parameters Between Gastric Cancer and Gastric Stromal Tumors: Evaluation With Oral Contrast Plus Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography
title_full_unstemmed Difference in Perfusion Parameters Between Gastric Cancer and Gastric Stromal Tumors: Evaluation With Oral Contrast Plus Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography
title_short Difference in Perfusion Parameters Between Gastric Cancer and Gastric Stromal Tumors: Evaluation With Oral Contrast Plus Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography
title_sort difference in perfusion parameters between gastric cancer and gastric stromal tumors: evaluation with oral contrast plus contrast-enhanced ultrasonography
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7214801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32432030
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00532
work_keys_str_mv AT wangxiaohua differenceinperfusionparametersbetweengastriccancerandgastricstromaltumorsevaluationwithoralcontrastpluscontrastenhancedultrasonography
AT kouhongju differenceinperfusionparametersbetweengastriccancerandgastricstromaltumorsevaluationwithoralcontrastpluscontrastenhancedultrasonography
AT hehuiliao differenceinperfusionparametersbetweengastriccancerandgastricstromaltumorsevaluationwithoralcontrastpluscontrastenhancedultrasonography
AT lumingdong differenceinperfusionparametersbetweengastriccancerandgastricstromaltumorsevaluationwithoralcontrastpluscontrastenhancedultrasonography
AT zhoulingling differenceinperfusionparametersbetweengastriccancerandgastricstromaltumorsevaluationwithoralcontrastpluscontrastenhancedultrasonography
AT wangliang differenceinperfusionparametersbetweengastriccancerandgastricstromaltumorsevaluationwithoralcontrastpluscontrastenhancedultrasonography