Cargando…
Difference in Perfusion Parameters Between Gastric Cancer and Gastric Stromal Tumors: Evaluation With Oral Contrast Plus Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography
Objective: To explore the difference of perfusion parameters between gastric cancer (GC) and gastric stromal tumors (GSTs) by using oral contrast plus contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (OC+CEUS). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 149 patients with histologically confirmed gastric lesions (80 pati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7214801/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32432030 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00532 |
_version_ | 1783532047285878784 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Xiaohua Kou, Hongju He, Huiliao Lu, Mingdong Zhou, Lingling Wang, Liang |
author_facet | Wang, Xiaohua Kou, Hongju He, Huiliao Lu, Mingdong Zhou, Lingling Wang, Liang |
author_sort | Wang, Xiaohua |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: To explore the difference of perfusion parameters between gastric cancer (GC) and gastric stromal tumors (GSTs) by using oral contrast plus contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (OC+CEUS). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 149 patients with histologically confirmed gastric lesions (80 patients with GC and 69 patients with GST). OC+CEUS was performed in all patients in the GC group and the GST group before surgery. The cine loops of OC+CEUS of all cases were analyzed. The perfusion parameters including arrival time (AT), time to peak (TTP), basal intensity (BI), and peak intensity (PI) were obtained via a program designed for autotracking contrast quantification (ACQ). The between-group differences in these parameters were compared. Results: According to time-intensity curve (TIC) analysis, high-risk GST had higher PI than low-risk GST (P < 0.05). GC had faster AT and higher PI than normal gastric wall (P < 0.05); GST had higher PI than normal gastric wall (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the GC group had faster AT and higher PI than the GST group (P < 0.05). In contrast, the difference in BI and peak time (TTP) between the groups was not significant (P > 0.05). Conclusion: AT and PI differ significantly between the GC group and the GST group. As a new method, OC+CEUS has value for the differential diagnosis of GC and GST. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7214801 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72148012020-05-19 Difference in Perfusion Parameters Between Gastric Cancer and Gastric Stromal Tumors: Evaluation With Oral Contrast Plus Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography Wang, Xiaohua Kou, Hongju He, Huiliao Lu, Mingdong Zhou, Lingling Wang, Liang Front Oncol Oncology Objective: To explore the difference of perfusion parameters between gastric cancer (GC) and gastric stromal tumors (GSTs) by using oral contrast plus contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (OC+CEUS). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 149 patients with histologically confirmed gastric lesions (80 patients with GC and 69 patients with GST). OC+CEUS was performed in all patients in the GC group and the GST group before surgery. The cine loops of OC+CEUS of all cases were analyzed. The perfusion parameters including arrival time (AT), time to peak (TTP), basal intensity (BI), and peak intensity (PI) were obtained via a program designed for autotracking contrast quantification (ACQ). The between-group differences in these parameters were compared. Results: According to time-intensity curve (TIC) analysis, high-risk GST had higher PI than low-risk GST (P < 0.05). GC had faster AT and higher PI than normal gastric wall (P < 0.05); GST had higher PI than normal gastric wall (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the GC group had faster AT and higher PI than the GST group (P < 0.05). In contrast, the difference in BI and peak time (TTP) between the groups was not significant (P > 0.05). Conclusion: AT and PI differ significantly between the GC group and the GST group. As a new method, OC+CEUS has value for the differential diagnosis of GC and GST. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7214801/ /pubmed/32432030 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00532 Text en Copyright © 2020 Wang, Kou, He, Lu, Zhou and Wang. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Wang, Xiaohua Kou, Hongju He, Huiliao Lu, Mingdong Zhou, Lingling Wang, Liang Difference in Perfusion Parameters Between Gastric Cancer and Gastric Stromal Tumors: Evaluation With Oral Contrast Plus Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography |
title | Difference in Perfusion Parameters Between Gastric Cancer and Gastric Stromal Tumors: Evaluation With Oral Contrast Plus Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography |
title_full | Difference in Perfusion Parameters Between Gastric Cancer and Gastric Stromal Tumors: Evaluation With Oral Contrast Plus Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography |
title_fullStr | Difference in Perfusion Parameters Between Gastric Cancer and Gastric Stromal Tumors: Evaluation With Oral Contrast Plus Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography |
title_full_unstemmed | Difference in Perfusion Parameters Between Gastric Cancer and Gastric Stromal Tumors: Evaluation With Oral Contrast Plus Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography |
title_short | Difference in Perfusion Parameters Between Gastric Cancer and Gastric Stromal Tumors: Evaluation With Oral Contrast Plus Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography |
title_sort | difference in perfusion parameters between gastric cancer and gastric stromal tumors: evaluation with oral contrast plus contrast-enhanced ultrasonography |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7214801/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32432030 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00532 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangxiaohua differenceinperfusionparametersbetweengastriccancerandgastricstromaltumorsevaluationwithoralcontrastpluscontrastenhancedultrasonography AT kouhongju differenceinperfusionparametersbetweengastriccancerandgastricstromaltumorsevaluationwithoralcontrastpluscontrastenhancedultrasonography AT hehuiliao differenceinperfusionparametersbetweengastriccancerandgastricstromaltumorsevaluationwithoralcontrastpluscontrastenhancedultrasonography AT lumingdong differenceinperfusionparametersbetweengastriccancerandgastricstromaltumorsevaluationwithoralcontrastpluscontrastenhancedultrasonography AT zhoulingling differenceinperfusionparametersbetweengastriccancerandgastricstromaltumorsevaluationwithoralcontrastpluscontrastenhancedultrasonography AT wangliang differenceinperfusionparametersbetweengastriccancerandgastricstromaltumorsevaluationwithoralcontrastpluscontrastenhancedultrasonography |