Cargando…

Relationship between sperm morphology and sperm DNA dispersion

BACKGROUND: The pathogenesis of teratozoospermia (<4% morphologically normal sperm cells) and the relationship between sperm morphological abnormalities and abnormal sperm nuclear DNA fragmentation, which are considered indicators of male fertility, have not been elucidated. Our research was desi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jakubik-Uljasz, Joanna, Gill, Kamil, Rosiak-Gill, Aleksandra, Piasecka, Malgorzata
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7215007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32420146
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2020.01.31
_version_ 1783532092294955008
author Jakubik-Uljasz, Joanna
Gill, Kamil
Rosiak-Gill, Aleksandra
Piasecka, Malgorzata
author_facet Jakubik-Uljasz, Joanna
Gill, Kamil
Rosiak-Gill, Aleksandra
Piasecka, Malgorzata
author_sort Jakubik-Uljasz, Joanna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The pathogenesis of teratozoospermia (<4% morphologically normal sperm cells) and the relationship between sperm morphological abnormalities and abnormal sperm nuclear DNA fragmentation, which are considered indicators of male fertility, have not been elucidated. Our research was designed to determine the prevalence of different sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) levels in men with teratozoospermia and to establish a discriminating threshold value for SDF in assessing sperm morphology. METHODS: Basic semen characteristics and detailed sperm morphological analysis (head, neck, midpiece, and tail defects and excess residual cytoplasm) (WHO, 2010), and the nuclear sperm DNA dispersion test were performed on semen samples obtained from 523 men with teratozoospermia (n=296) and those without teratozoospermia (n=227). RESULTS: Subjects with abnormal sperm morphology had not only lower results for standard sperm characteristics, including detailed sperm morphological abnormalities, but also a higher proportion of sperm cells with SDF vs. men with normal sperm morphology. Moreover, significantly fewer subjects with low SDF levels (≤15%), more subjects with high SDF levels (>30%) and a higher odds ratio (OR) for having high SDF levels were found in the group of men with teratozoospermia vs. men without teratozoospermia. However, the receiving operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis indicated that a SDF >18% was a significant negative predictive value to distinguish between men with normal sperm morphology or men with abnormal sperm morphology. The optimal area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.746. In the group of men with teratozoospermia, a higher incidence of men with >18% SDF and a higher OR for having >18% SDF were observed. SDF negatively correlated with sperm number, morphologically normal sperm cells, sperm motility and sperm vitality but positively correlated with the teratozoospermia index (TZI) and detailed sperm morphological abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: The obtained findings demonstrated that: (I) detailed sperm structural defects coexist with abnormal nuclear sperm DNA dispersion, (II) men with teratozoospermia may have a higher risk for sperm DNA damage, (III) the calculated optimal SDF value of 18% measured by the DNA sperm dispersion test is the best criterion to predict normal and abnormal sperm morphology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7215007
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72150072020-05-15 Relationship between sperm morphology and sperm DNA dispersion Jakubik-Uljasz, Joanna Gill, Kamil Rosiak-Gill, Aleksandra Piasecka, Malgorzata Transl Androl Urol Original Article BACKGROUND: The pathogenesis of teratozoospermia (<4% morphologically normal sperm cells) and the relationship between sperm morphological abnormalities and abnormal sperm nuclear DNA fragmentation, which are considered indicators of male fertility, have not been elucidated. Our research was designed to determine the prevalence of different sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) levels in men with teratozoospermia and to establish a discriminating threshold value for SDF in assessing sperm morphology. METHODS: Basic semen characteristics and detailed sperm morphological analysis (head, neck, midpiece, and tail defects and excess residual cytoplasm) (WHO, 2010), and the nuclear sperm DNA dispersion test were performed on semen samples obtained from 523 men with teratozoospermia (n=296) and those without teratozoospermia (n=227). RESULTS: Subjects with abnormal sperm morphology had not only lower results for standard sperm characteristics, including detailed sperm morphological abnormalities, but also a higher proportion of sperm cells with SDF vs. men with normal sperm morphology. Moreover, significantly fewer subjects with low SDF levels (≤15%), more subjects with high SDF levels (>30%) and a higher odds ratio (OR) for having high SDF levels were found in the group of men with teratozoospermia vs. men without teratozoospermia. However, the receiving operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis indicated that a SDF >18% was a significant negative predictive value to distinguish between men with normal sperm morphology or men with abnormal sperm morphology. The optimal area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.746. In the group of men with teratozoospermia, a higher incidence of men with >18% SDF and a higher OR for having >18% SDF were observed. SDF negatively correlated with sperm number, morphologically normal sperm cells, sperm motility and sperm vitality but positively correlated with the teratozoospermia index (TZI) and detailed sperm morphological abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: The obtained findings demonstrated that: (I) detailed sperm structural defects coexist with abnormal nuclear sperm DNA dispersion, (II) men with teratozoospermia may have a higher risk for sperm DNA damage, (III) the calculated optimal SDF value of 18% measured by the DNA sperm dispersion test is the best criterion to predict normal and abnormal sperm morphology. AME Publishing Company 2020-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7215007/ /pubmed/32420146 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2020.01.31 Text en 2020 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Jakubik-Uljasz, Joanna
Gill, Kamil
Rosiak-Gill, Aleksandra
Piasecka, Malgorzata
Relationship between sperm morphology and sperm DNA dispersion
title Relationship between sperm morphology and sperm DNA dispersion
title_full Relationship between sperm morphology and sperm DNA dispersion
title_fullStr Relationship between sperm morphology and sperm DNA dispersion
title_full_unstemmed Relationship between sperm morphology and sperm DNA dispersion
title_short Relationship between sperm morphology and sperm DNA dispersion
title_sort relationship between sperm morphology and sperm dna dispersion
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7215007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32420146
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2020.01.31
work_keys_str_mv AT jakubikuljaszjoanna relationshipbetweenspermmorphologyandspermdnadispersion
AT gillkamil relationshipbetweenspermmorphologyandspermdnadispersion
AT rosiakgillaleksandra relationshipbetweenspermmorphologyandspermdnadispersion
AT piaseckamalgorzata relationshipbetweenspermmorphologyandspermdnadispersion