Cargando…

Evolution of prostate cancer diagnosis: retrospective analysis of magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided biopsies protocol in routine practice and patients management

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is today strongly recommended in prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis. Therefore, MRI/ultrasound (MRI/US) fusion-guided biopsy is becoming the new standard patients management. METHODS: We report our experience during the last 4 years using this technique, wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Essid, Mohamed Ali, Chakroun, Marouene, Nouhaud, François Xavier, Lair, Michael, Gobet, Françoise, Pfister, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7215024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32420169
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2020.02.02
_version_ 1783532096367624192
author Essid, Mohamed Ali
Chakroun, Marouene
Nouhaud, François Xavier
Lair, Michael
Gobet, Françoise
Pfister, Christian
author_facet Essid, Mohamed Ali
Chakroun, Marouene
Nouhaud, François Xavier
Lair, Michael
Gobet, Françoise
Pfister, Christian
author_sort Essid, Mohamed Ali
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is today strongly recommended in prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis. Therefore, MRI/ultrasound (MRI/US) fusion-guided biopsy is becoming the new standard patients management. METHODS: We report our experience during the last 4 years using this technique, with a protocol of 6 random cores (instead of the most used 12 cores protocol) associated to the target cores (2 to 3 per lesion). Our study involved 236 patients including real life routine practice: biopsy naïve patients (n=107), patients with previous negative standard prostate biopsies (n=67) and patients in PCa active surveillance (n=62). Finally, 76 patients have a robotic radical prostatectomy. RESULTS: Mean age of the population was 66 years. Median PSA was 8.5 ng/mL. Overall and significant cancer detection were respectively 66.6% and 38.5%, with a large difference considering biopsy history: 63.5% in biopsy naïve patient, 53.7% in patient with previous negative biopsies and 82.3% in patients under active surveillance. Targeted biopsies missed 28 cancers among 8 were significant and standard biopsies missed 33 cancers among 14 were significant. Moreover, concordance between biopsy samples and radical prostatectomy specimens was evaluated at 80%. CONCLUSIONS: Comparing to literature data, similar results were observed in our retrospective study, even with reduced random cores, suggesting a real change in patients management in particular in active surveillance group with a reclassification rate of 56.4% using the Epstein criteria.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7215024
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72150242020-05-15 Evolution of prostate cancer diagnosis: retrospective analysis of magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided biopsies protocol in routine practice and patients management Essid, Mohamed Ali Chakroun, Marouene Nouhaud, François Xavier Lair, Michael Gobet, Françoise Pfister, Christian Transl Androl Urol Original Article BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is today strongly recommended in prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis. Therefore, MRI/ultrasound (MRI/US) fusion-guided biopsy is becoming the new standard patients management. METHODS: We report our experience during the last 4 years using this technique, with a protocol of 6 random cores (instead of the most used 12 cores protocol) associated to the target cores (2 to 3 per lesion). Our study involved 236 patients including real life routine practice: biopsy naïve patients (n=107), patients with previous negative standard prostate biopsies (n=67) and patients in PCa active surveillance (n=62). Finally, 76 patients have a robotic radical prostatectomy. RESULTS: Mean age of the population was 66 years. Median PSA was 8.5 ng/mL. Overall and significant cancer detection were respectively 66.6% and 38.5%, with a large difference considering biopsy history: 63.5% in biopsy naïve patient, 53.7% in patient with previous negative biopsies and 82.3% in patients under active surveillance. Targeted biopsies missed 28 cancers among 8 were significant and standard biopsies missed 33 cancers among 14 were significant. Moreover, concordance between biopsy samples and radical prostatectomy specimens was evaluated at 80%. CONCLUSIONS: Comparing to literature data, similar results were observed in our retrospective study, even with reduced random cores, suggesting a real change in patients management in particular in active surveillance group with a reclassification rate of 56.4% using the Epstein criteria. AME Publishing Company 2020-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7215024/ /pubmed/32420169 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2020.02.02 Text en 2020 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Essid, Mohamed Ali
Chakroun, Marouene
Nouhaud, François Xavier
Lair, Michael
Gobet, Françoise
Pfister, Christian
Evolution of prostate cancer diagnosis: retrospective analysis of magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided biopsies protocol in routine practice and patients management
title Evolution of prostate cancer diagnosis: retrospective analysis of magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided biopsies protocol in routine practice and patients management
title_full Evolution of prostate cancer diagnosis: retrospective analysis of magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided biopsies protocol in routine practice and patients management
title_fullStr Evolution of prostate cancer diagnosis: retrospective analysis of magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided biopsies protocol in routine practice and patients management
title_full_unstemmed Evolution of prostate cancer diagnosis: retrospective analysis of magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided biopsies protocol in routine practice and patients management
title_short Evolution of prostate cancer diagnosis: retrospective analysis of magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided biopsies protocol in routine practice and patients management
title_sort evolution of prostate cancer diagnosis: retrospective analysis of magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided biopsies protocol in routine practice and patients management
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7215024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32420169
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2020.02.02
work_keys_str_mv AT essidmohamedali evolutionofprostatecancerdiagnosisretrospectiveanalysisofmagneticresonanceimagingultrasoundfusionguidedbiopsiesprotocolinroutinepracticeandpatientsmanagement
AT chakrounmarouene evolutionofprostatecancerdiagnosisretrospectiveanalysisofmagneticresonanceimagingultrasoundfusionguidedbiopsiesprotocolinroutinepracticeandpatientsmanagement
AT nouhaudfrancoisxavier evolutionofprostatecancerdiagnosisretrospectiveanalysisofmagneticresonanceimagingultrasoundfusionguidedbiopsiesprotocolinroutinepracticeandpatientsmanagement
AT lairmichael evolutionofprostatecancerdiagnosisretrospectiveanalysisofmagneticresonanceimagingultrasoundfusionguidedbiopsiesprotocolinroutinepracticeandpatientsmanagement
AT gobetfrancoise evolutionofprostatecancerdiagnosisretrospectiveanalysisofmagneticresonanceimagingultrasoundfusionguidedbiopsiesprotocolinroutinepracticeandpatientsmanagement
AT pfisterchristian evolutionofprostatecancerdiagnosisretrospectiveanalysisofmagneticresonanceimagingultrasoundfusionguidedbiopsiesprotocolinroutinepracticeandpatientsmanagement