Cargando…

Predictive model using prostate MRI findings can predict candidates for nerve sparing radical prostatectomy among low-intermediate risk prostate cancer patients

BACKGROUND: In order to improve postoperative functional outcome, including urinary continence and erectile function, nerve sparing surgery is recommended for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer (PCa). However, due to poor diagnosis accuracy at the preoperative stage, upstaging occurs...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Song, Gang, Ruan, Mingjian, Wang, He, Lin, Zhiyong, Wang, Xiaoying, Li, Xueying, Li, Peng, Wang, Yandong, Zhou, Binyi, Hu, Xuege, Liu, Hua, Wang, Hao, Guo, Yinglu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7215049/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32420149
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2020.01.28
_version_ 1783532102330875904
author Song, Gang
Ruan, Mingjian
Wang, He
Lin, Zhiyong
Wang, Xiaoying
Li, Xueying
Li, Peng
Wang, Yandong
Zhou, Binyi
Hu, Xuege
Liu, Hua
Wang, Hao
Guo, Yinglu
author_facet Song, Gang
Ruan, Mingjian
Wang, He
Lin, Zhiyong
Wang, Xiaoying
Li, Xueying
Li, Peng
Wang, Yandong
Zhou, Binyi
Hu, Xuege
Liu, Hua
Wang, Hao
Guo, Yinglu
author_sort Song, Gang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In order to improve postoperative functional outcome, including urinary continence and erectile function, nerve sparing surgery is recommended for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer (PCa). However, due to poor diagnosis accuracy at the preoperative stage, upstaging occurs in a considerable proportion of patients. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADS v2) have recently shown excellent performance in diagnosis and staging of PCa. The aim of this study was to develop a predictive model based on PI-RADS v2 for postoperative upstaging in patients with low-intermediate risk PCa. METHODS: The medical records of 314 patients with low-intermediate risk PCa [prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level ≤20 ng/mL, Gleason score (GS) <8, and clinical stage < T3] who underwent preoperative mpMRI and radical prostatectomy in the Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital between January 2012 and July 2019 were reviewed retrospectively. Clinicopathological characteristics were collected. All MRI reports were done at our institution as part of routine clinical practice before prostate biopsy and there was no re-reporting occurred. Using PI-RADS v2, the mpMRI results were assigned to three groups: “negative”, “suspicious”, and “positive”. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to assess factors associated with postoperative pathological upstaging, defined as the presence of pT3 at final pathology. A regression coefficient based model for predicting postoperative upstaging was constructed and internally validated using 1,000 bootstrap resamples. The performance of the model was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). With the optimal cutoff point the performance of the model was assessed through analysis of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. RESULTS: Upstaging was observed in 119 (37.9%) patients. The univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that PSA density, biopsy Gleason grade group (GGG), and mpMRI findings were significantly independent predictors for postoperative upstaging (all P<0.05). A predictive model showing very favorable calibration characteristics and higher accuracy than the single variables was constructed (AUC =0.74; P<0.001). At the optimal cutoff point, the model demonstrated a sensitivity and negative predictive value of 87.4% and 87.0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: PI-RADS v2 assessment proved to be one of the most valuable predictors for postoperative upstaging in patients with low-intermediate risk PCa. The predictive model, based on PI-RADS v2 assessment, PSA density, and biopsy GGG, may help to select suitable candidates for nerve sparing radical prostatectomy among patients with low-intermediate risk PCa.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7215049
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72150492020-05-15 Predictive model using prostate MRI findings can predict candidates for nerve sparing radical prostatectomy among low-intermediate risk prostate cancer patients Song, Gang Ruan, Mingjian Wang, He Lin, Zhiyong Wang, Xiaoying Li, Xueying Li, Peng Wang, Yandong Zhou, Binyi Hu, Xuege Liu, Hua Wang, Hao Guo, Yinglu Transl Androl Urol Original Article BACKGROUND: In order to improve postoperative functional outcome, including urinary continence and erectile function, nerve sparing surgery is recommended for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer (PCa). However, due to poor diagnosis accuracy at the preoperative stage, upstaging occurs in a considerable proportion of patients. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADS v2) have recently shown excellent performance in diagnosis and staging of PCa. The aim of this study was to develop a predictive model based on PI-RADS v2 for postoperative upstaging in patients with low-intermediate risk PCa. METHODS: The medical records of 314 patients with low-intermediate risk PCa [prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level ≤20 ng/mL, Gleason score (GS) <8, and clinical stage < T3] who underwent preoperative mpMRI and radical prostatectomy in the Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital between January 2012 and July 2019 were reviewed retrospectively. Clinicopathological characteristics were collected. All MRI reports were done at our institution as part of routine clinical practice before prostate biopsy and there was no re-reporting occurred. Using PI-RADS v2, the mpMRI results were assigned to three groups: “negative”, “suspicious”, and “positive”. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to assess factors associated with postoperative pathological upstaging, defined as the presence of pT3 at final pathology. A regression coefficient based model for predicting postoperative upstaging was constructed and internally validated using 1,000 bootstrap resamples. The performance of the model was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). With the optimal cutoff point the performance of the model was assessed through analysis of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. RESULTS: Upstaging was observed in 119 (37.9%) patients. The univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that PSA density, biopsy Gleason grade group (GGG), and mpMRI findings were significantly independent predictors for postoperative upstaging (all P<0.05). A predictive model showing very favorable calibration characteristics and higher accuracy than the single variables was constructed (AUC =0.74; P<0.001). At the optimal cutoff point, the model demonstrated a sensitivity and negative predictive value of 87.4% and 87.0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: PI-RADS v2 assessment proved to be one of the most valuable predictors for postoperative upstaging in patients with low-intermediate risk PCa. The predictive model, based on PI-RADS v2 assessment, PSA density, and biopsy GGG, may help to select suitable candidates for nerve sparing radical prostatectomy among patients with low-intermediate risk PCa. AME Publishing Company 2020-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7215049/ /pubmed/32420149 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2020.01.28 Text en 2020 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Song, Gang
Ruan, Mingjian
Wang, He
Lin, Zhiyong
Wang, Xiaoying
Li, Xueying
Li, Peng
Wang, Yandong
Zhou, Binyi
Hu, Xuege
Liu, Hua
Wang, Hao
Guo, Yinglu
Predictive model using prostate MRI findings can predict candidates for nerve sparing radical prostatectomy among low-intermediate risk prostate cancer patients
title Predictive model using prostate MRI findings can predict candidates for nerve sparing radical prostatectomy among low-intermediate risk prostate cancer patients
title_full Predictive model using prostate MRI findings can predict candidates for nerve sparing radical prostatectomy among low-intermediate risk prostate cancer patients
title_fullStr Predictive model using prostate MRI findings can predict candidates for nerve sparing radical prostatectomy among low-intermediate risk prostate cancer patients
title_full_unstemmed Predictive model using prostate MRI findings can predict candidates for nerve sparing radical prostatectomy among low-intermediate risk prostate cancer patients
title_short Predictive model using prostate MRI findings can predict candidates for nerve sparing radical prostatectomy among low-intermediate risk prostate cancer patients
title_sort predictive model using prostate mri findings can predict candidates for nerve sparing radical prostatectomy among low-intermediate risk prostate cancer patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7215049/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32420149
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2020.01.28
work_keys_str_mv AT songgang predictivemodelusingprostatemrifindingscanpredictcandidatesfornervesparingradicalprostatectomyamonglowintermediateriskprostatecancerpatients
AT ruanmingjian predictivemodelusingprostatemrifindingscanpredictcandidatesfornervesparingradicalprostatectomyamonglowintermediateriskprostatecancerpatients
AT wanghe predictivemodelusingprostatemrifindingscanpredictcandidatesfornervesparingradicalprostatectomyamonglowintermediateriskprostatecancerpatients
AT linzhiyong predictivemodelusingprostatemrifindingscanpredictcandidatesfornervesparingradicalprostatectomyamonglowintermediateriskprostatecancerpatients
AT wangxiaoying predictivemodelusingprostatemrifindingscanpredictcandidatesfornervesparingradicalprostatectomyamonglowintermediateriskprostatecancerpatients
AT lixueying predictivemodelusingprostatemrifindingscanpredictcandidatesfornervesparingradicalprostatectomyamonglowintermediateriskprostatecancerpatients
AT lipeng predictivemodelusingprostatemrifindingscanpredictcandidatesfornervesparingradicalprostatectomyamonglowintermediateriskprostatecancerpatients
AT wangyandong predictivemodelusingprostatemrifindingscanpredictcandidatesfornervesparingradicalprostatectomyamonglowintermediateriskprostatecancerpatients
AT zhoubinyi predictivemodelusingprostatemrifindingscanpredictcandidatesfornervesparingradicalprostatectomyamonglowintermediateriskprostatecancerpatients
AT huxuege predictivemodelusingprostatemrifindingscanpredictcandidatesfornervesparingradicalprostatectomyamonglowintermediateriskprostatecancerpatients
AT liuhua predictivemodelusingprostatemrifindingscanpredictcandidatesfornervesparingradicalprostatectomyamonglowintermediateriskprostatecancerpatients
AT wanghao predictivemodelusingprostatemrifindingscanpredictcandidatesfornervesparingradicalprostatectomyamonglowintermediateriskprostatecancerpatients
AT guoyinglu predictivemodelusingprostatemrifindingscanpredictcandidatesfornervesparingradicalprostatectomyamonglowintermediateriskprostatecancerpatients