Cargando…

From Complex Modulus E* to Creep Compliance D(t): Experimental and Modeling Study

Creep compliance (D(t)) is a very important input for the thermal cracking resistance in the Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG). The aim of the work presented here is to predict the results of creep compliance D(t) from the result of complex modulus E*(ω). The work plan is divided i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Daoudi, Abdeldjalil, Perraton, Daniel, Dony, Anne, Carter, Alan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7215418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32326170
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13081945
_version_ 1783532182563717120
author Daoudi, Abdeldjalil
Perraton, Daniel
Dony, Anne
Carter, Alan
author_facet Daoudi, Abdeldjalil
Perraton, Daniel
Dony, Anne
Carter, Alan
author_sort Daoudi, Abdeldjalil
collection PubMed
description Creep compliance (D(t)) is a very important input for the thermal cracking resistance in the Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG). The aim of the work presented here is to predict the results of creep compliance D(t) from the result of complex modulus E*(ω). The work plan is divided in two main parts: an experimental part consisting of creep tests, and a modeling part. Three configurations were compared together, namely direct tensile, direct compression and indirect tensile tests. The modelling part consists of using a 2S2P1D model coupled to Kopelman approximation to switch from the frequency domain to the time domain. Additionally, 2S2P1D was used to calibrate the generalized Kelvin–Voigt model and get the creep compliance directly from E* results. The experimental results show that D(t) from direct tensile and direct compression are the same in the viscoelastic domain and are greater than D(t) from the indirect tensile test. The indirect tensile test (IDT) seems to be very difficult to achieve compared to the other two variants. The converted results using the 2S2P1D model coupled to Kopelman approximation and the results from the GKV model describe the experimental points very well.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7215418
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72154182020-05-18 From Complex Modulus E* to Creep Compliance D(t): Experimental and Modeling Study Daoudi, Abdeldjalil Perraton, Daniel Dony, Anne Carter, Alan Materials (Basel) Article Creep compliance (D(t)) is a very important input for the thermal cracking resistance in the Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG). The aim of the work presented here is to predict the results of creep compliance D(t) from the result of complex modulus E*(ω). The work plan is divided in two main parts: an experimental part consisting of creep tests, and a modeling part. Three configurations were compared together, namely direct tensile, direct compression and indirect tensile tests. The modelling part consists of using a 2S2P1D model coupled to Kopelman approximation to switch from the frequency domain to the time domain. Additionally, 2S2P1D was used to calibrate the generalized Kelvin–Voigt model and get the creep compliance directly from E* results. The experimental results show that D(t) from direct tensile and direct compression are the same in the viscoelastic domain and are greater than D(t) from the indirect tensile test. The indirect tensile test (IDT) seems to be very difficult to achieve compared to the other two variants. The converted results using the 2S2P1D model coupled to Kopelman approximation and the results from the GKV model describe the experimental points very well. MDPI 2020-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7215418/ /pubmed/32326170 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13081945 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Daoudi, Abdeldjalil
Perraton, Daniel
Dony, Anne
Carter, Alan
From Complex Modulus E* to Creep Compliance D(t): Experimental and Modeling Study
title From Complex Modulus E* to Creep Compliance D(t): Experimental and Modeling Study
title_full From Complex Modulus E* to Creep Compliance D(t): Experimental and Modeling Study
title_fullStr From Complex Modulus E* to Creep Compliance D(t): Experimental and Modeling Study
title_full_unstemmed From Complex Modulus E* to Creep Compliance D(t): Experimental and Modeling Study
title_short From Complex Modulus E* to Creep Compliance D(t): Experimental and Modeling Study
title_sort from complex modulus e* to creep compliance d(t): experimental and modeling study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7215418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32326170
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13081945
work_keys_str_mv AT daoudiabdeldjalil fromcomplexmodulusetocreepcompliancedtexperimentalandmodelingstudy
AT perratondaniel fromcomplexmodulusetocreepcompliancedtexperimentalandmodelingstudy
AT donyanne fromcomplexmodulusetocreepcompliancedtexperimentalandmodelingstudy
AT carteralan fromcomplexmodulusetocreepcompliancedtexperimentalandmodelingstudy