Cargando…

3-D Printed Protective Equipment during COVID-19 Pandemic

While the number of coronavirus cases from 2019 continues to grow, hospitals are reporting shortages of personal protective equipment (PPE) for frontline healthcare workers. Furthermore, PPE for the eyes and mouth, such as face shields, allow for additional protection when working with aerosols. 3-D...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wesemann, Christian, Pieralli, Stefano, Fretwurst, Tobias, Nold, Julian, Nelson, Katja, Schmelzeisen, Rainer, Hellwig, Elmar, Spies, Benedikt Christopher
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7215430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32344688
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13081997
_version_ 1783532185418989568
author Wesemann, Christian
Pieralli, Stefano
Fretwurst, Tobias
Nold, Julian
Nelson, Katja
Schmelzeisen, Rainer
Hellwig, Elmar
Spies, Benedikt Christopher
author_facet Wesemann, Christian
Pieralli, Stefano
Fretwurst, Tobias
Nold, Julian
Nelson, Katja
Schmelzeisen, Rainer
Hellwig, Elmar
Spies, Benedikt Christopher
author_sort Wesemann, Christian
collection PubMed
description While the number of coronavirus cases from 2019 continues to grow, hospitals are reporting shortages of personal protective equipment (PPE) for frontline healthcare workers. Furthermore, PPE for the eyes and mouth, such as face shields, allow for additional protection when working with aerosols. 3-D printing enables the easy and rapid production of lightweight plastic frameworks based on open-source data. The practicality and clinical suitability of four face shields printed using a fused deposition modeling printer were examined. The weight, printing time, and required tools for assembly were evaluated. To assess the clinical suitability, each face shield was worn for one hour by 10 clinicians and rated using a visual analogue scale. The filament weight (21–42 g) and printing time (1:40–3:17 h) differed significantly between the four frames. Likewise, the fit, wearing comfort, space for additional PPE, and protection varied between the designs. For clinical suitability, a chosen design should allow sufficient space for goggles and N95 respirators as well as maximum coverage of the facial area. Consequently, two datasets are recommended. For the final selection of the ideal dataset to be used for printing, scalability and economic efficiency need to be carefully balanced with an acceptable degree of protection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7215430
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72154302020-05-18 3-D Printed Protective Equipment during COVID-19 Pandemic Wesemann, Christian Pieralli, Stefano Fretwurst, Tobias Nold, Julian Nelson, Katja Schmelzeisen, Rainer Hellwig, Elmar Spies, Benedikt Christopher Materials (Basel) Article While the number of coronavirus cases from 2019 continues to grow, hospitals are reporting shortages of personal protective equipment (PPE) for frontline healthcare workers. Furthermore, PPE for the eyes and mouth, such as face shields, allow for additional protection when working with aerosols. 3-D printing enables the easy and rapid production of lightweight plastic frameworks based on open-source data. The practicality and clinical suitability of four face shields printed using a fused deposition modeling printer were examined. The weight, printing time, and required tools for assembly were evaluated. To assess the clinical suitability, each face shield was worn for one hour by 10 clinicians and rated using a visual analogue scale. The filament weight (21–42 g) and printing time (1:40–3:17 h) differed significantly between the four frames. Likewise, the fit, wearing comfort, space for additional PPE, and protection varied between the designs. For clinical suitability, a chosen design should allow sufficient space for goggles and N95 respirators as well as maximum coverage of the facial area. Consequently, two datasets are recommended. For the final selection of the ideal dataset to be used for printing, scalability and economic efficiency need to be carefully balanced with an acceptable degree of protection. MDPI 2020-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7215430/ /pubmed/32344688 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13081997 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wesemann, Christian
Pieralli, Stefano
Fretwurst, Tobias
Nold, Julian
Nelson, Katja
Schmelzeisen, Rainer
Hellwig, Elmar
Spies, Benedikt Christopher
3-D Printed Protective Equipment during COVID-19 Pandemic
title 3-D Printed Protective Equipment during COVID-19 Pandemic
title_full 3-D Printed Protective Equipment during COVID-19 Pandemic
title_fullStr 3-D Printed Protective Equipment during COVID-19 Pandemic
title_full_unstemmed 3-D Printed Protective Equipment during COVID-19 Pandemic
title_short 3-D Printed Protective Equipment during COVID-19 Pandemic
title_sort 3-d printed protective equipment during covid-19 pandemic
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7215430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32344688
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13081997
work_keys_str_mv AT wesemannchristian 3dprintedprotectiveequipmentduringcovid19pandemic
AT pierallistefano 3dprintedprotectiveequipmentduringcovid19pandemic
AT fretwursttobias 3dprintedprotectiveequipmentduringcovid19pandemic
AT noldjulian 3dprintedprotectiveequipmentduringcovid19pandemic
AT nelsonkatja 3dprintedprotectiveequipmentduringcovid19pandemic
AT schmelzeisenrainer 3dprintedprotectiveequipmentduringcovid19pandemic
AT hellwigelmar 3dprintedprotectiveequipmentduringcovid19pandemic
AT spiesbenediktchristopher 3dprintedprotectiveequipmentduringcovid19pandemic