Cargando…
3-D Printed Protective Equipment during COVID-19 Pandemic
While the number of coronavirus cases from 2019 continues to grow, hospitals are reporting shortages of personal protective equipment (PPE) for frontline healthcare workers. Furthermore, PPE for the eyes and mouth, such as face shields, allow for additional protection when working with aerosols. 3-D...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7215430/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32344688 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13081997 |
_version_ | 1783532185418989568 |
---|---|
author | Wesemann, Christian Pieralli, Stefano Fretwurst, Tobias Nold, Julian Nelson, Katja Schmelzeisen, Rainer Hellwig, Elmar Spies, Benedikt Christopher |
author_facet | Wesemann, Christian Pieralli, Stefano Fretwurst, Tobias Nold, Julian Nelson, Katja Schmelzeisen, Rainer Hellwig, Elmar Spies, Benedikt Christopher |
author_sort | Wesemann, Christian |
collection | PubMed |
description | While the number of coronavirus cases from 2019 continues to grow, hospitals are reporting shortages of personal protective equipment (PPE) for frontline healthcare workers. Furthermore, PPE for the eyes and mouth, such as face shields, allow for additional protection when working with aerosols. 3-D printing enables the easy and rapid production of lightweight plastic frameworks based on open-source data. The practicality and clinical suitability of four face shields printed using a fused deposition modeling printer were examined. The weight, printing time, and required tools for assembly were evaluated. To assess the clinical suitability, each face shield was worn for one hour by 10 clinicians and rated using a visual analogue scale. The filament weight (21–42 g) and printing time (1:40–3:17 h) differed significantly between the four frames. Likewise, the fit, wearing comfort, space for additional PPE, and protection varied between the designs. For clinical suitability, a chosen design should allow sufficient space for goggles and N95 respirators as well as maximum coverage of the facial area. Consequently, two datasets are recommended. For the final selection of the ideal dataset to be used for printing, scalability and economic efficiency need to be carefully balanced with an acceptable degree of protection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7215430 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72154302020-05-18 3-D Printed Protective Equipment during COVID-19 Pandemic Wesemann, Christian Pieralli, Stefano Fretwurst, Tobias Nold, Julian Nelson, Katja Schmelzeisen, Rainer Hellwig, Elmar Spies, Benedikt Christopher Materials (Basel) Article While the number of coronavirus cases from 2019 continues to grow, hospitals are reporting shortages of personal protective equipment (PPE) for frontline healthcare workers. Furthermore, PPE for the eyes and mouth, such as face shields, allow for additional protection when working with aerosols. 3-D printing enables the easy and rapid production of lightweight plastic frameworks based on open-source data. The practicality and clinical suitability of four face shields printed using a fused deposition modeling printer were examined. The weight, printing time, and required tools for assembly were evaluated. To assess the clinical suitability, each face shield was worn for one hour by 10 clinicians and rated using a visual analogue scale. The filament weight (21–42 g) and printing time (1:40–3:17 h) differed significantly between the four frames. Likewise, the fit, wearing comfort, space for additional PPE, and protection varied between the designs. For clinical suitability, a chosen design should allow sufficient space for goggles and N95 respirators as well as maximum coverage of the facial area. Consequently, two datasets are recommended. For the final selection of the ideal dataset to be used for printing, scalability and economic efficiency need to be carefully balanced with an acceptable degree of protection. MDPI 2020-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7215430/ /pubmed/32344688 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13081997 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Wesemann, Christian Pieralli, Stefano Fretwurst, Tobias Nold, Julian Nelson, Katja Schmelzeisen, Rainer Hellwig, Elmar Spies, Benedikt Christopher 3-D Printed Protective Equipment during COVID-19 Pandemic |
title | 3-D Printed Protective Equipment during COVID-19 Pandemic |
title_full | 3-D Printed Protective Equipment during COVID-19 Pandemic |
title_fullStr | 3-D Printed Protective Equipment during COVID-19 Pandemic |
title_full_unstemmed | 3-D Printed Protective Equipment during COVID-19 Pandemic |
title_short | 3-D Printed Protective Equipment during COVID-19 Pandemic |
title_sort | 3-d printed protective equipment during covid-19 pandemic |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7215430/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32344688 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13081997 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wesemannchristian 3dprintedprotectiveequipmentduringcovid19pandemic AT pierallistefano 3dprintedprotectiveequipmentduringcovid19pandemic AT fretwursttobias 3dprintedprotectiveequipmentduringcovid19pandemic AT noldjulian 3dprintedprotectiveequipmentduringcovid19pandemic AT nelsonkatja 3dprintedprotectiveequipmentduringcovid19pandemic AT schmelzeisenrainer 3dprintedprotectiveequipmentduringcovid19pandemic AT hellwigelmar 3dprintedprotectiveequipmentduringcovid19pandemic AT spiesbenediktchristopher 3dprintedprotectiveequipmentduringcovid19pandemic |