Cargando…

Airborne Transmission Route of COVID-19: Why 2 Meters/6 Feet of Inter-Personal Distance Could Not Be Enough

The COVID-19 pandemic caused the shutdown of entire nations all over the world. In addition to mobility restrictions of people, the World Health Organization and the Governments have prescribed maintaining an inter-personal distance of 1.5 or 2 m (about 6 feet) from each other in order to minimize t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Setti, Leonardo, Passarini, Fabrizio, De Gennaro, Gianluigi, Barbieri, Pierluigi, Perrone, Maria Grazia, Borelli, Massimo, Palmisani, Jolanda, Di Gilio, Alessia, Piscitelli, Prisco, Miani, Alessandro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7215485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32340347
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17082932
_version_ 1783532198625804288
author Setti, Leonardo
Passarini, Fabrizio
De Gennaro, Gianluigi
Barbieri, Pierluigi
Perrone, Maria Grazia
Borelli, Massimo
Palmisani, Jolanda
Di Gilio, Alessia
Piscitelli, Prisco
Miani, Alessandro
author_facet Setti, Leonardo
Passarini, Fabrizio
De Gennaro, Gianluigi
Barbieri, Pierluigi
Perrone, Maria Grazia
Borelli, Massimo
Palmisani, Jolanda
Di Gilio, Alessia
Piscitelli, Prisco
Miani, Alessandro
author_sort Setti, Leonardo
collection PubMed
description The COVID-19 pandemic caused the shutdown of entire nations all over the world. In addition to mobility restrictions of people, the World Health Organization and the Governments have prescribed maintaining an inter-personal distance of 1.5 or 2 m (about 6 feet) from each other in order to minimize the risk of contagion through the droplets that we usually disseminate around us from nose and mouth. However, recently published studies support the hypothesis of virus transmission over a distance of 2 m from an infected person. Researchers have proved the higher aerosol and surface stability of SARS-COV-2 as compared with SARS-COV-1 (with the virus remaining viable and infectious in aerosol for hours) and that airborne transmission of SARS-CoV can occur besides close-distance contacts. Indeed, there is reasonable evidence about the possibility of SARS-COV-2 airborne transmission due to its persistence into aerosol droplets in a viable and infectious form. Based on the available knowledge and epidemiological observations, it is plausible that small particles containing the virus may diffuse in indoor environments covering distances up to 10 m from the emission sources, thus representing a kind of aerosol transmission. On-field studies carried out inside Wuhan Hospitals showed the presence of SARS-COV-2 RNA in air samples collected in the hospitals and also in the surroundings, leading to the conclusion that the airborne route has to be considered an important pathway for viral diffusion. Similar findings are reported in analyses concerning air samples collected at the Nebraska University Hospital. On March 16th, we have released a Position Paper emphasizing the airborne route as a possible additional factor for interpreting the anomalous COVID-19 outbreaks in northern Italy, ranked as one of the most polluted areas in Europe and characterized by high particulate matter (PM) concentrations. The available information on the SARS-COV-2 spreading supports the hypothesis of airborne diffusion of infected droplets from person to person at a distance greater than two meters (6 feet). The inter-personal distance of 2 m can be reasonably considered as an effective protection only if everybody wears face masks in daily life activities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7215485
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72154852020-05-22 Airborne Transmission Route of COVID-19: Why 2 Meters/6 Feet of Inter-Personal Distance Could Not Be Enough Setti, Leonardo Passarini, Fabrizio De Gennaro, Gianluigi Barbieri, Pierluigi Perrone, Maria Grazia Borelli, Massimo Palmisani, Jolanda Di Gilio, Alessia Piscitelli, Prisco Miani, Alessandro Int J Environ Res Public Health Editorial The COVID-19 pandemic caused the shutdown of entire nations all over the world. In addition to mobility restrictions of people, the World Health Organization and the Governments have prescribed maintaining an inter-personal distance of 1.5 or 2 m (about 6 feet) from each other in order to minimize the risk of contagion through the droplets that we usually disseminate around us from nose and mouth. However, recently published studies support the hypothesis of virus transmission over a distance of 2 m from an infected person. Researchers have proved the higher aerosol and surface stability of SARS-COV-2 as compared with SARS-COV-1 (with the virus remaining viable and infectious in aerosol for hours) and that airborne transmission of SARS-CoV can occur besides close-distance contacts. Indeed, there is reasonable evidence about the possibility of SARS-COV-2 airborne transmission due to its persistence into aerosol droplets in a viable and infectious form. Based on the available knowledge and epidemiological observations, it is plausible that small particles containing the virus may diffuse in indoor environments covering distances up to 10 m from the emission sources, thus representing a kind of aerosol transmission. On-field studies carried out inside Wuhan Hospitals showed the presence of SARS-COV-2 RNA in air samples collected in the hospitals and also in the surroundings, leading to the conclusion that the airborne route has to be considered an important pathway for viral diffusion. Similar findings are reported in analyses concerning air samples collected at the Nebraska University Hospital. On March 16th, we have released a Position Paper emphasizing the airborne route as a possible additional factor for interpreting the anomalous COVID-19 outbreaks in northern Italy, ranked as one of the most polluted areas in Europe and characterized by high particulate matter (PM) concentrations. The available information on the SARS-COV-2 spreading supports the hypothesis of airborne diffusion of infected droplets from person to person at a distance greater than two meters (6 feet). The inter-personal distance of 2 m can be reasonably considered as an effective protection only if everybody wears face masks in daily life activities. MDPI 2020-04-23 2020-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7215485/ /pubmed/32340347 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17082932 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Editorial
Setti, Leonardo
Passarini, Fabrizio
De Gennaro, Gianluigi
Barbieri, Pierluigi
Perrone, Maria Grazia
Borelli, Massimo
Palmisani, Jolanda
Di Gilio, Alessia
Piscitelli, Prisco
Miani, Alessandro
Airborne Transmission Route of COVID-19: Why 2 Meters/6 Feet of Inter-Personal Distance Could Not Be Enough
title Airborne Transmission Route of COVID-19: Why 2 Meters/6 Feet of Inter-Personal Distance Could Not Be Enough
title_full Airborne Transmission Route of COVID-19: Why 2 Meters/6 Feet of Inter-Personal Distance Could Not Be Enough
title_fullStr Airborne Transmission Route of COVID-19: Why 2 Meters/6 Feet of Inter-Personal Distance Could Not Be Enough
title_full_unstemmed Airborne Transmission Route of COVID-19: Why 2 Meters/6 Feet of Inter-Personal Distance Could Not Be Enough
title_short Airborne Transmission Route of COVID-19: Why 2 Meters/6 Feet of Inter-Personal Distance Could Not Be Enough
title_sort airborne transmission route of covid-19: why 2 meters/6 feet of inter-personal distance could not be enough
topic Editorial
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7215485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32340347
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17082932
work_keys_str_mv AT settileonardo airbornetransmissionrouteofcovid19why2meters6feetofinterpersonaldistancecouldnotbeenough
AT passarinifabrizio airbornetransmissionrouteofcovid19why2meters6feetofinterpersonaldistancecouldnotbeenough
AT degennarogianluigi airbornetransmissionrouteofcovid19why2meters6feetofinterpersonaldistancecouldnotbeenough
AT barbieripierluigi airbornetransmissionrouteofcovid19why2meters6feetofinterpersonaldistancecouldnotbeenough
AT perronemariagrazia airbornetransmissionrouteofcovid19why2meters6feetofinterpersonaldistancecouldnotbeenough
AT borellimassimo airbornetransmissionrouteofcovid19why2meters6feetofinterpersonaldistancecouldnotbeenough
AT palmisanijolanda airbornetransmissionrouteofcovid19why2meters6feetofinterpersonaldistancecouldnotbeenough
AT digilioalessia airbornetransmissionrouteofcovid19why2meters6feetofinterpersonaldistancecouldnotbeenough
AT piscitelliprisco airbornetransmissionrouteofcovid19why2meters6feetofinterpersonaldistancecouldnotbeenough
AT mianialessandro airbornetransmissionrouteofcovid19why2meters6feetofinterpersonaldistancecouldnotbeenough