Cargando…
Open Rigid Internal Fixation of Low-Neck Condylar Fractures of the Mandible: Mechanical Comparison of 16 Plate Designs
Background: In the literature, no information on plates for low-neck mandibular condylar osteosynthesis can be found, despite the fact that 30 plate designs have already been published. The aim of this study was to compare any dedicated plates for possible use in low-neck condylar fracture osteosynt...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7215721/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32331209 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13081953 |
_version_ | 1783532252856057856 |
---|---|
author | Kozakiewicz, Marcin Zieliński, Rafał Konieczny, Bartłomiej Krasowski, Michał Okulski, Jakub |
author_facet | Kozakiewicz, Marcin Zieliński, Rafał Konieczny, Bartłomiej Krasowski, Michał Okulski, Jakub |
author_sort | Kozakiewicz, Marcin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: In the literature, no information on plates for low-neck mandibular condylar osteosynthesis can be found, despite the fact that 30 plate designs have already been published. The aim of this study was to compare any dedicated plates for possible use in low-neck condylar fracture osteosynthesis. Methods: The force required for 1-mm displacement of the fixed fracture fragments and incidents of screw loosening were recorded on polyurethane mandibles among 16 designs of titanium plates fixed by 6-mm screws in a 2.0 system. Results: Double-straight plate fixation was the mechanical gold standard (15.2 ± 3.5 N), followed by A-shape Condylar Plates (14.9 ± 2.1 N), X-shape Condylar Plates (14.2 ± 1.3 N) and Auto Repositioning Plates (11.8 ± 2.4 N). Screw loosening was uncommon, as a minimum of three screws were placed into the condylar part. Fewer screws were lost from the ramus part of the fixation if the plate was attached to the condylar part by three screws. Often, the stability of the ramus screws was lost when there were only two fixing screws in the condyle (p < 0.001). Conclusions: It is advisable to consider the mechanical advantages as one decides which plate to choose for open rigid internal fixation in low-neck condylar fractures, or to only be aware of the significant differences in mobility within the fracture line after fixation with different dedicated plates. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7215721 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72157212020-05-22 Open Rigid Internal Fixation of Low-Neck Condylar Fractures of the Mandible: Mechanical Comparison of 16 Plate Designs Kozakiewicz, Marcin Zieliński, Rafał Konieczny, Bartłomiej Krasowski, Michał Okulski, Jakub Materials (Basel) Article Background: In the literature, no information on plates for low-neck mandibular condylar osteosynthesis can be found, despite the fact that 30 plate designs have already been published. The aim of this study was to compare any dedicated plates for possible use in low-neck condylar fracture osteosynthesis. Methods: The force required for 1-mm displacement of the fixed fracture fragments and incidents of screw loosening were recorded on polyurethane mandibles among 16 designs of titanium plates fixed by 6-mm screws in a 2.0 system. Results: Double-straight plate fixation was the mechanical gold standard (15.2 ± 3.5 N), followed by A-shape Condylar Plates (14.9 ± 2.1 N), X-shape Condylar Plates (14.2 ± 1.3 N) and Auto Repositioning Plates (11.8 ± 2.4 N). Screw loosening was uncommon, as a minimum of three screws were placed into the condylar part. Fewer screws were lost from the ramus part of the fixation if the plate was attached to the condylar part by three screws. Often, the stability of the ramus screws was lost when there were only two fixing screws in the condyle (p < 0.001). Conclusions: It is advisable to consider the mechanical advantages as one decides which plate to choose for open rigid internal fixation in low-neck condylar fractures, or to only be aware of the significant differences in mobility within the fracture line after fixation with different dedicated plates. MDPI 2020-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7215721/ /pubmed/32331209 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13081953 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Kozakiewicz, Marcin Zieliński, Rafał Konieczny, Bartłomiej Krasowski, Michał Okulski, Jakub Open Rigid Internal Fixation of Low-Neck Condylar Fractures of the Mandible: Mechanical Comparison of 16 Plate Designs |
title | Open Rigid Internal Fixation of Low-Neck Condylar Fractures of the Mandible: Mechanical Comparison of 16 Plate Designs |
title_full | Open Rigid Internal Fixation of Low-Neck Condylar Fractures of the Mandible: Mechanical Comparison of 16 Plate Designs |
title_fullStr | Open Rigid Internal Fixation of Low-Neck Condylar Fractures of the Mandible: Mechanical Comparison of 16 Plate Designs |
title_full_unstemmed | Open Rigid Internal Fixation of Low-Neck Condylar Fractures of the Mandible: Mechanical Comparison of 16 Plate Designs |
title_short | Open Rigid Internal Fixation of Low-Neck Condylar Fractures of the Mandible: Mechanical Comparison of 16 Plate Designs |
title_sort | open rigid internal fixation of low-neck condylar fractures of the mandible: mechanical comparison of 16 plate designs |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7215721/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32331209 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13081953 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kozakiewiczmarcin openrigidinternalfixationoflowneckcondylarfracturesofthemandiblemechanicalcomparisonof16platedesigns AT zielinskirafał openrigidinternalfixationoflowneckcondylarfracturesofthemandiblemechanicalcomparisonof16platedesigns AT koniecznybartłomiej openrigidinternalfixationoflowneckcondylarfracturesofthemandiblemechanicalcomparisonof16platedesigns AT krasowskimichał openrigidinternalfixationoflowneckcondylarfracturesofthemandiblemechanicalcomparisonof16platedesigns AT okulskijakub openrigidinternalfixationoflowneckcondylarfracturesofthemandiblemechanicalcomparisonof16platedesigns |