Cargando…

The Prevention of Implant Surface Alterations in the Treatment of Peri-Implantitis: Comparison of Three Different Mechanical and Physical Treatments

The surgical treatment of peri-implantitis is currently based on the removal of biofilms from the implant surface by primary means of mechanical and physical treatments. However, such approaches often determine some alterations of the implant surface with detrimental effects on re-osseointegration....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lollobrigida, Marco, Fortunato, Lorenzo, Serafini, Giorgio, Mazzucchi, Giulia, Bozzuto, Giuseppina, Molinari, Agnese, Serra, Emanuele, Menchini, Francesca, Vozza, Iole, De Biase, Alberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7215863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32290450
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17082624
_version_ 1783532287030198272
author Lollobrigida, Marco
Fortunato, Lorenzo
Serafini, Giorgio
Mazzucchi, Giulia
Bozzuto, Giuseppina
Molinari, Agnese
Serra, Emanuele
Menchini, Francesca
Vozza, Iole
De Biase, Alberto
author_facet Lollobrigida, Marco
Fortunato, Lorenzo
Serafini, Giorgio
Mazzucchi, Giulia
Bozzuto, Giuseppina
Molinari, Agnese
Serra, Emanuele
Menchini, Francesca
Vozza, Iole
De Biase, Alberto
author_sort Lollobrigida, Marco
collection PubMed
description The surgical treatment of peri-implantitis is currently based on the removal of biofilms from the implant surface by primary means of mechanical and physical treatments. However, such approaches often determine some alterations of the implant surface with detrimental effects on re-osseointegration. This study aims to evaluate the effects of four different mechanical and physical treatments on titanium samples with moderately rough surface. Air powder abrasion (AP) with glycine powder, a titanium brush (TB) and a diode laser at 3 W (L3) and 4 W (L4) were tested. Surface morphology, roughness and chemical composition were then assessed by scanning electron microscope (SEM), white light interferometer and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), respectively. The microscopic analysis revealed significant alterations in surface morphology on TB samples, while AP and L3 had only a minor or null impact. L4 samples revealed signs of overheating due to the excessive power. Nevertheless, the overall roughness of the samples was not significantly altered in terms of roughness parameters. Similarly, surface chemical composition was not significantly affected by the treatments. Among the treatments tested in this study, air powder abrasion with glycine powder and 3 W diode laser had the lowest impact on surface physicochemical properties.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7215863
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72158632020-05-22 The Prevention of Implant Surface Alterations in the Treatment of Peri-Implantitis: Comparison of Three Different Mechanical and Physical Treatments Lollobrigida, Marco Fortunato, Lorenzo Serafini, Giorgio Mazzucchi, Giulia Bozzuto, Giuseppina Molinari, Agnese Serra, Emanuele Menchini, Francesca Vozza, Iole De Biase, Alberto Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The surgical treatment of peri-implantitis is currently based on the removal of biofilms from the implant surface by primary means of mechanical and physical treatments. However, such approaches often determine some alterations of the implant surface with detrimental effects on re-osseointegration. This study aims to evaluate the effects of four different mechanical and physical treatments on titanium samples with moderately rough surface. Air powder abrasion (AP) with glycine powder, a titanium brush (TB) and a diode laser at 3 W (L3) and 4 W (L4) were tested. Surface morphology, roughness and chemical composition were then assessed by scanning electron microscope (SEM), white light interferometer and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), respectively. The microscopic analysis revealed significant alterations in surface morphology on TB samples, while AP and L3 had only a minor or null impact. L4 samples revealed signs of overheating due to the excessive power. Nevertheless, the overall roughness of the samples was not significantly altered in terms of roughness parameters. Similarly, surface chemical composition was not significantly affected by the treatments. Among the treatments tested in this study, air powder abrasion with glycine powder and 3 W diode laser had the lowest impact on surface physicochemical properties. MDPI 2020-04-11 2020-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7215863/ /pubmed/32290450 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17082624 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lollobrigida, Marco
Fortunato, Lorenzo
Serafini, Giorgio
Mazzucchi, Giulia
Bozzuto, Giuseppina
Molinari, Agnese
Serra, Emanuele
Menchini, Francesca
Vozza, Iole
De Biase, Alberto
The Prevention of Implant Surface Alterations in the Treatment of Peri-Implantitis: Comparison of Three Different Mechanical and Physical Treatments
title The Prevention of Implant Surface Alterations in the Treatment of Peri-Implantitis: Comparison of Three Different Mechanical and Physical Treatments
title_full The Prevention of Implant Surface Alterations in the Treatment of Peri-Implantitis: Comparison of Three Different Mechanical and Physical Treatments
title_fullStr The Prevention of Implant Surface Alterations in the Treatment of Peri-Implantitis: Comparison of Three Different Mechanical and Physical Treatments
title_full_unstemmed The Prevention of Implant Surface Alterations in the Treatment of Peri-Implantitis: Comparison of Three Different Mechanical and Physical Treatments
title_short The Prevention of Implant Surface Alterations in the Treatment of Peri-Implantitis: Comparison of Three Different Mechanical and Physical Treatments
title_sort prevention of implant surface alterations in the treatment of peri-implantitis: comparison of three different mechanical and physical treatments
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7215863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32290450
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17082624
work_keys_str_mv AT lollobrigidamarco thepreventionofimplantsurfacealterationsinthetreatmentofperiimplantitiscomparisonofthreedifferentmechanicalandphysicaltreatments
AT fortunatolorenzo thepreventionofimplantsurfacealterationsinthetreatmentofperiimplantitiscomparisonofthreedifferentmechanicalandphysicaltreatments
AT serafinigiorgio thepreventionofimplantsurfacealterationsinthetreatmentofperiimplantitiscomparisonofthreedifferentmechanicalandphysicaltreatments
AT mazzucchigiulia thepreventionofimplantsurfacealterationsinthetreatmentofperiimplantitiscomparisonofthreedifferentmechanicalandphysicaltreatments
AT bozzutogiuseppina thepreventionofimplantsurfacealterationsinthetreatmentofperiimplantitiscomparisonofthreedifferentmechanicalandphysicaltreatments
AT molinariagnese thepreventionofimplantsurfacealterationsinthetreatmentofperiimplantitiscomparisonofthreedifferentmechanicalandphysicaltreatments
AT serraemanuele thepreventionofimplantsurfacealterationsinthetreatmentofperiimplantitiscomparisonofthreedifferentmechanicalandphysicaltreatments
AT menchinifrancesca thepreventionofimplantsurfacealterationsinthetreatmentofperiimplantitiscomparisonofthreedifferentmechanicalandphysicaltreatments
AT vozzaiole thepreventionofimplantsurfacealterationsinthetreatmentofperiimplantitiscomparisonofthreedifferentmechanicalandphysicaltreatments
AT debiasealberto thepreventionofimplantsurfacealterationsinthetreatmentofperiimplantitiscomparisonofthreedifferentmechanicalandphysicaltreatments
AT lollobrigidamarco preventionofimplantsurfacealterationsinthetreatmentofperiimplantitiscomparisonofthreedifferentmechanicalandphysicaltreatments
AT fortunatolorenzo preventionofimplantsurfacealterationsinthetreatmentofperiimplantitiscomparisonofthreedifferentmechanicalandphysicaltreatments
AT serafinigiorgio preventionofimplantsurfacealterationsinthetreatmentofperiimplantitiscomparisonofthreedifferentmechanicalandphysicaltreatments
AT mazzucchigiulia preventionofimplantsurfacealterationsinthetreatmentofperiimplantitiscomparisonofthreedifferentmechanicalandphysicaltreatments
AT bozzutogiuseppina preventionofimplantsurfacealterationsinthetreatmentofperiimplantitiscomparisonofthreedifferentmechanicalandphysicaltreatments
AT molinariagnese preventionofimplantsurfacealterationsinthetreatmentofperiimplantitiscomparisonofthreedifferentmechanicalandphysicaltreatments
AT serraemanuele preventionofimplantsurfacealterationsinthetreatmentofperiimplantitiscomparisonofthreedifferentmechanicalandphysicaltreatments
AT menchinifrancesca preventionofimplantsurfacealterationsinthetreatmentofperiimplantitiscomparisonofthreedifferentmechanicalandphysicaltreatments
AT vozzaiole preventionofimplantsurfacealterationsinthetreatmentofperiimplantitiscomparisonofthreedifferentmechanicalandphysicaltreatments
AT debiasealberto preventionofimplantsurfacealterationsinthetreatmentofperiimplantitiscomparisonofthreedifferentmechanicalandphysicaltreatments