Cargando…
The Prevention of Implant Surface Alterations in the Treatment of Peri-Implantitis: Comparison of Three Different Mechanical and Physical Treatments
The surgical treatment of peri-implantitis is currently based on the removal of biofilms from the implant surface by primary means of mechanical and physical treatments. However, such approaches often determine some alterations of the implant surface with detrimental effects on re-osseointegration....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7215863/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32290450 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17082624 |
_version_ | 1783532287030198272 |
---|---|
author | Lollobrigida, Marco Fortunato, Lorenzo Serafini, Giorgio Mazzucchi, Giulia Bozzuto, Giuseppina Molinari, Agnese Serra, Emanuele Menchini, Francesca Vozza, Iole De Biase, Alberto |
author_facet | Lollobrigida, Marco Fortunato, Lorenzo Serafini, Giorgio Mazzucchi, Giulia Bozzuto, Giuseppina Molinari, Agnese Serra, Emanuele Menchini, Francesca Vozza, Iole De Biase, Alberto |
author_sort | Lollobrigida, Marco |
collection | PubMed |
description | The surgical treatment of peri-implantitis is currently based on the removal of biofilms from the implant surface by primary means of mechanical and physical treatments. However, such approaches often determine some alterations of the implant surface with detrimental effects on re-osseointegration. This study aims to evaluate the effects of four different mechanical and physical treatments on titanium samples with moderately rough surface. Air powder abrasion (AP) with glycine powder, a titanium brush (TB) and a diode laser at 3 W (L3) and 4 W (L4) were tested. Surface morphology, roughness and chemical composition were then assessed by scanning electron microscope (SEM), white light interferometer and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), respectively. The microscopic analysis revealed significant alterations in surface morphology on TB samples, while AP and L3 had only a minor or null impact. L4 samples revealed signs of overheating due to the excessive power. Nevertheless, the overall roughness of the samples was not significantly altered in terms of roughness parameters. Similarly, surface chemical composition was not significantly affected by the treatments. Among the treatments tested in this study, air powder abrasion with glycine powder and 3 W diode laser had the lowest impact on surface physicochemical properties. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7215863 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72158632020-05-22 The Prevention of Implant Surface Alterations in the Treatment of Peri-Implantitis: Comparison of Three Different Mechanical and Physical Treatments Lollobrigida, Marco Fortunato, Lorenzo Serafini, Giorgio Mazzucchi, Giulia Bozzuto, Giuseppina Molinari, Agnese Serra, Emanuele Menchini, Francesca Vozza, Iole De Biase, Alberto Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The surgical treatment of peri-implantitis is currently based on the removal of biofilms from the implant surface by primary means of mechanical and physical treatments. However, such approaches often determine some alterations of the implant surface with detrimental effects on re-osseointegration. This study aims to evaluate the effects of four different mechanical and physical treatments on titanium samples with moderately rough surface. Air powder abrasion (AP) with glycine powder, a titanium brush (TB) and a diode laser at 3 W (L3) and 4 W (L4) were tested. Surface morphology, roughness and chemical composition were then assessed by scanning electron microscope (SEM), white light interferometer and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), respectively. The microscopic analysis revealed significant alterations in surface morphology on TB samples, while AP and L3 had only a minor or null impact. L4 samples revealed signs of overheating due to the excessive power. Nevertheless, the overall roughness of the samples was not significantly altered in terms of roughness parameters. Similarly, surface chemical composition was not significantly affected by the treatments. Among the treatments tested in this study, air powder abrasion with glycine powder and 3 W diode laser had the lowest impact on surface physicochemical properties. MDPI 2020-04-11 2020-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7215863/ /pubmed/32290450 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17082624 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Lollobrigida, Marco Fortunato, Lorenzo Serafini, Giorgio Mazzucchi, Giulia Bozzuto, Giuseppina Molinari, Agnese Serra, Emanuele Menchini, Francesca Vozza, Iole De Biase, Alberto The Prevention of Implant Surface Alterations in the Treatment of Peri-Implantitis: Comparison of Three Different Mechanical and Physical Treatments |
title | The Prevention of Implant Surface Alterations in the Treatment of Peri-Implantitis: Comparison of Three Different Mechanical and Physical Treatments |
title_full | The Prevention of Implant Surface Alterations in the Treatment of Peri-Implantitis: Comparison of Three Different Mechanical and Physical Treatments |
title_fullStr | The Prevention of Implant Surface Alterations in the Treatment of Peri-Implantitis: Comparison of Three Different Mechanical and Physical Treatments |
title_full_unstemmed | The Prevention of Implant Surface Alterations in the Treatment of Peri-Implantitis: Comparison of Three Different Mechanical and Physical Treatments |
title_short | The Prevention of Implant Surface Alterations in the Treatment of Peri-Implantitis: Comparison of Three Different Mechanical and Physical Treatments |
title_sort | prevention of implant surface alterations in the treatment of peri-implantitis: comparison of three different mechanical and physical treatments |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7215863/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32290450 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17082624 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lollobrigidamarco thepreventionofimplantsurfacealterationsinthetreatmentofperiimplantitiscomparisonofthreedifferentmechanicalandphysicaltreatments AT fortunatolorenzo thepreventionofimplantsurfacealterationsinthetreatmentofperiimplantitiscomparisonofthreedifferentmechanicalandphysicaltreatments AT serafinigiorgio thepreventionofimplantsurfacealterationsinthetreatmentofperiimplantitiscomparisonofthreedifferentmechanicalandphysicaltreatments AT mazzucchigiulia thepreventionofimplantsurfacealterationsinthetreatmentofperiimplantitiscomparisonofthreedifferentmechanicalandphysicaltreatments AT bozzutogiuseppina thepreventionofimplantsurfacealterationsinthetreatmentofperiimplantitiscomparisonofthreedifferentmechanicalandphysicaltreatments AT molinariagnese thepreventionofimplantsurfacealterationsinthetreatmentofperiimplantitiscomparisonofthreedifferentmechanicalandphysicaltreatments AT serraemanuele thepreventionofimplantsurfacealterationsinthetreatmentofperiimplantitiscomparisonofthreedifferentmechanicalandphysicaltreatments AT menchinifrancesca thepreventionofimplantsurfacealterationsinthetreatmentofperiimplantitiscomparisonofthreedifferentmechanicalandphysicaltreatments AT vozzaiole thepreventionofimplantsurfacealterationsinthetreatmentofperiimplantitiscomparisonofthreedifferentmechanicalandphysicaltreatments AT debiasealberto thepreventionofimplantsurfacealterationsinthetreatmentofperiimplantitiscomparisonofthreedifferentmechanicalandphysicaltreatments AT lollobrigidamarco preventionofimplantsurfacealterationsinthetreatmentofperiimplantitiscomparisonofthreedifferentmechanicalandphysicaltreatments AT fortunatolorenzo preventionofimplantsurfacealterationsinthetreatmentofperiimplantitiscomparisonofthreedifferentmechanicalandphysicaltreatments AT serafinigiorgio preventionofimplantsurfacealterationsinthetreatmentofperiimplantitiscomparisonofthreedifferentmechanicalandphysicaltreatments AT mazzucchigiulia preventionofimplantsurfacealterationsinthetreatmentofperiimplantitiscomparisonofthreedifferentmechanicalandphysicaltreatments AT bozzutogiuseppina preventionofimplantsurfacealterationsinthetreatmentofperiimplantitiscomparisonofthreedifferentmechanicalandphysicaltreatments AT molinariagnese preventionofimplantsurfacealterationsinthetreatmentofperiimplantitiscomparisonofthreedifferentmechanicalandphysicaltreatments AT serraemanuele preventionofimplantsurfacealterationsinthetreatmentofperiimplantitiscomparisonofthreedifferentmechanicalandphysicaltreatments AT menchinifrancesca preventionofimplantsurfacealterationsinthetreatmentofperiimplantitiscomparisonofthreedifferentmechanicalandphysicaltreatments AT vozzaiole preventionofimplantsurfacealterationsinthetreatmentofperiimplantitiscomparisonofthreedifferentmechanicalandphysicaltreatments AT debiasealberto preventionofimplantsurfacealterationsinthetreatmentofperiimplantitiscomparisonofthreedifferentmechanicalandphysicaltreatments |