Cargando…
Combination Strategies for Immune-Checkpoint Blockade and Response Prediction by Artificial Intelligence
The therapeutic concept of unleashing a pre-existing immune response against the tumor by the application of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) has resulted in long-term survival in advanced cancer patient subgroups. However, the majority of patients do not benefit from single-agent ICI and therefor...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7215892/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32325898 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21082856 |
_version_ | 1783532293601624064 |
---|---|
author | Huemer, Florian Leisch, Michael Geisberger, Roland Melchardt, Thomas Rinnerthaler, Gabriel Zaborsky, Nadja Greil, Richard |
author_facet | Huemer, Florian Leisch, Michael Geisberger, Roland Melchardt, Thomas Rinnerthaler, Gabriel Zaborsky, Nadja Greil, Richard |
author_sort | Huemer, Florian |
collection | PubMed |
description | The therapeutic concept of unleashing a pre-existing immune response against the tumor by the application of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) has resulted in long-term survival in advanced cancer patient subgroups. However, the majority of patients do not benefit from single-agent ICI and therefore new combination strategies are eagerly necessitated. In addition to conventional chemotherapy, kinase inhibitors as well as tumor-specific vaccinations are extensively investigated in combination with ICI to augment therapy responses. An unprecedented clinical outcome with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR-)T cell therapy has led to the approval for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma and B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia whereas response rates in solid tumors are unsatisfactory. Immune-checkpoints negatively impact CAR-T cell therapy in hematologic and solid malignancies and as a consequence provide a therapeutic target to overcome resistance. Established biomarkers such as programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and tumor mutational burden (TMB) help to select patients who will benefit most from ICI, however, biomarker negativity does not exclude responses. Investigating alterations in the antigen presenting pathway as well as radiomics have the potential to determine tumor immunogenicity and response to ICI. Within this review we summarize the literature about specific combination partners for ICI and the applicability of artificial intelligence to predict ICI therapy responses. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7215892 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72158922020-05-22 Combination Strategies for Immune-Checkpoint Blockade and Response Prediction by Artificial Intelligence Huemer, Florian Leisch, Michael Geisberger, Roland Melchardt, Thomas Rinnerthaler, Gabriel Zaborsky, Nadja Greil, Richard Int J Mol Sci Review The therapeutic concept of unleashing a pre-existing immune response against the tumor by the application of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) has resulted in long-term survival in advanced cancer patient subgroups. However, the majority of patients do not benefit from single-agent ICI and therefore new combination strategies are eagerly necessitated. In addition to conventional chemotherapy, kinase inhibitors as well as tumor-specific vaccinations are extensively investigated in combination with ICI to augment therapy responses. An unprecedented clinical outcome with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR-)T cell therapy has led to the approval for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma and B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia whereas response rates in solid tumors are unsatisfactory. Immune-checkpoints negatively impact CAR-T cell therapy in hematologic and solid malignancies and as a consequence provide a therapeutic target to overcome resistance. Established biomarkers such as programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and tumor mutational burden (TMB) help to select patients who will benefit most from ICI, however, biomarker negativity does not exclude responses. Investigating alterations in the antigen presenting pathway as well as radiomics have the potential to determine tumor immunogenicity and response to ICI. Within this review we summarize the literature about specific combination partners for ICI and the applicability of artificial intelligence to predict ICI therapy responses. MDPI 2020-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7215892/ /pubmed/32325898 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21082856 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Huemer, Florian Leisch, Michael Geisberger, Roland Melchardt, Thomas Rinnerthaler, Gabriel Zaborsky, Nadja Greil, Richard Combination Strategies for Immune-Checkpoint Blockade and Response Prediction by Artificial Intelligence |
title | Combination Strategies for Immune-Checkpoint Blockade and Response Prediction by Artificial Intelligence |
title_full | Combination Strategies for Immune-Checkpoint Blockade and Response Prediction by Artificial Intelligence |
title_fullStr | Combination Strategies for Immune-Checkpoint Blockade and Response Prediction by Artificial Intelligence |
title_full_unstemmed | Combination Strategies for Immune-Checkpoint Blockade and Response Prediction by Artificial Intelligence |
title_short | Combination Strategies for Immune-Checkpoint Blockade and Response Prediction by Artificial Intelligence |
title_sort | combination strategies for immune-checkpoint blockade and response prediction by artificial intelligence |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7215892/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32325898 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21082856 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huemerflorian combinationstrategiesforimmunecheckpointblockadeandresponsepredictionbyartificialintelligence AT leischmichael combinationstrategiesforimmunecheckpointblockadeandresponsepredictionbyartificialintelligence AT geisbergerroland combinationstrategiesforimmunecheckpointblockadeandresponsepredictionbyartificialintelligence AT melchardtthomas combinationstrategiesforimmunecheckpointblockadeandresponsepredictionbyartificialintelligence AT rinnerthalergabriel combinationstrategiesforimmunecheckpointblockadeandresponsepredictionbyartificialintelligence AT zaborskynadja combinationstrategiesforimmunecheckpointblockadeandresponsepredictionbyartificialintelligence AT greilrichard combinationstrategiesforimmunecheckpointblockadeandresponsepredictionbyartificialintelligence |