Cargando…

Combination Strategies for Immune-Checkpoint Blockade and Response Prediction by Artificial Intelligence

The therapeutic concept of unleashing a pre-existing immune response against the tumor by the application of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) has resulted in long-term survival in advanced cancer patient subgroups. However, the majority of patients do not benefit from single-agent ICI and therefor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huemer, Florian, Leisch, Michael, Geisberger, Roland, Melchardt, Thomas, Rinnerthaler, Gabriel, Zaborsky, Nadja, Greil, Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7215892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32325898
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21082856
_version_ 1783532293601624064
author Huemer, Florian
Leisch, Michael
Geisberger, Roland
Melchardt, Thomas
Rinnerthaler, Gabriel
Zaborsky, Nadja
Greil, Richard
author_facet Huemer, Florian
Leisch, Michael
Geisberger, Roland
Melchardt, Thomas
Rinnerthaler, Gabriel
Zaborsky, Nadja
Greil, Richard
author_sort Huemer, Florian
collection PubMed
description The therapeutic concept of unleashing a pre-existing immune response against the tumor by the application of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) has resulted in long-term survival in advanced cancer patient subgroups. However, the majority of patients do not benefit from single-agent ICI and therefore new combination strategies are eagerly necessitated. In addition to conventional chemotherapy, kinase inhibitors as well as tumor-specific vaccinations are extensively investigated in combination with ICI to augment therapy responses. An unprecedented clinical outcome with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR-)T cell therapy has led to the approval for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma and B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia whereas response rates in solid tumors are unsatisfactory. Immune-checkpoints negatively impact CAR-T cell therapy in hematologic and solid malignancies and as a consequence provide a therapeutic target to overcome resistance. Established biomarkers such as programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and tumor mutational burden (TMB) help to select patients who will benefit most from ICI, however, biomarker negativity does not exclude responses. Investigating alterations in the antigen presenting pathway as well as radiomics have the potential to determine tumor immunogenicity and response to ICI. Within this review we summarize the literature about specific combination partners for ICI and the applicability of artificial intelligence to predict ICI therapy responses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7215892
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72158922020-05-22 Combination Strategies for Immune-Checkpoint Blockade and Response Prediction by Artificial Intelligence Huemer, Florian Leisch, Michael Geisberger, Roland Melchardt, Thomas Rinnerthaler, Gabriel Zaborsky, Nadja Greil, Richard Int J Mol Sci Review The therapeutic concept of unleashing a pre-existing immune response against the tumor by the application of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) has resulted in long-term survival in advanced cancer patient subgroups. However, the majority of patients do not benefit from single-agent ICI and therefore new combination strategies are eagerly necessitated. In addition to conventional chemotherapy, kinase inhibitors as well as tumor-specific vaccinations are extensively investigated in combination with ICI to augment therapy responses. An unprecedented clinical outcome with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR-)T cell therapy has led to the approval for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma and B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia whereas response rates in solid tumors are unsatisfactory. Immune-checkpoints negatively impact CAR-T cell therapy in hematologic and solid malignancies and as a consequence provide a therapeutic target to overcome resistance. Established biomarkers such as programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and tumor mutational burden (TMB) help to select patients who will benefit most from ICI, however, biomarker negativity does not exclude responses. Investigating alterations in the antigen presenting pathway as well as radiomics have the potential to determine tumor immunogenicity and response to ICI. Within this review we summarize the literature about specific combination partners for ICI and the applicability of artificial intelligence to predict ICI therapy responses. MDPI 2020-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7215892/ /pubmed/32325898 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21082856 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Huemer, Florian
Leisch, Michael
Geisberger, Roland
Melchardt, Thomas
Rinnerthaler, Gabriel
Zaborsky, Nadja
Greil, Richard
Combination Strategies for Immune-Checkpoint Blockade and Response Prediction by Artificial Intelligence
title Combination Strategies for Immune-Checkpoint Blockade and Response Prediction by Artificial Intelligence
title_full Combination Strategies for Immune-Checkpoint Blockade and Response Prediction by Artificial Intelligence
title_fullStr Combination Strategies for Immune-Checkpoint Blockade and Response Prediction by Artificial Intelligence
title_full_unstemmed Combination Strategies for Immune-Checkpoint Blockade and Response Prediction by Artificial Intelligence
title_short Combination Strategies for Immune-Checkpoint Blockade and Response Prediction by Artificial Intelligence
title_sort combination strategies for immune-checkpoint blockade and response prediction by artificial intelligence
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7215892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32325898
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21082856
work_keys_str_mv AT huemerflorian combinationstrategiesforimmunecheckpointblockadeandresponsepredictionbyartificialintelligence
AT leischmichael combinationstrategiesforimmunecheckpointblockadeandresponsepredictionbyartificialintelligence
AT geisbergerroland combinationstrategiesforimmunecheckpointblockadeandresponsepredictionbyartificialintelligence
AT melchardtthomas combinationstrategiesforimmunecheckpointblockadeandresponsepredictionbyartificialintelligence
AT rinnerthalergabriel combinationstrategiesforimmunecheckpointblockadeandresponsepredictionbyartificialintelligence
AT zaborskynadja combinationstrategiesforimmunecheckpointblockadeandresponsepredictionbyartificialintelligence
AT greilrichard combinationstrategiesforimmunecheckpointblockadeandresponsepredictionbyartificialintelligence