Cargando…

Electrochemical modeling and evaluation for textile electrodes to skin

BACKGROUND: With the development of wearable health-monitoring technologies, a variety of textile electrodes have been produced and applied by researchers. However, there are no universal and effective methods even testing platforms for evaluating the skin–electrode electrochemical interface for tex...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Song, Jinzhong, Zhang, Yu, Yang, Yijing, Liu, Hao, Zhou, Tianshu, Zhang, Kui, Li, Fan, Xu, Zhi, Liu, Qingjun, Li, Jingsong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7216351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32393332
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-020-00772-5
_version_ 1783532397379190784
author Song, Jinzhong
Zhang, Yu
Yang, Yijing
Liu, Hao
Zhou, Tianshu
Zhang, Kui
Li, Fan
Xu, Zhi
Liu, Qingjun
Li, Jingsong
author_facet Song, Jinzhong
Zhang, Yu
Yang, Yijing
Liu, Hao
Zhou, Tianshu
Zhang, Kui
Li, Fan
Xu, Zhi
Liu, Qingjun
Li, Jingsong
author_sort Song, Jinzhong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: With the development of wearable health-monitoring technologies, a variety of textile electrodes have been produced and applied by researchers. However, there are no universal and effective methods even testing platforms for evaluating the skin–electrode electrochemical interface for textile electrodes because different human bodies have different skin characteristics. METHODS: An electrochemical modeling and evaluation for textile electrodes to skin was proposed, and two electrochemical evaluation platforms (EEP) were set up based on two simulated skin models (SSM). First, skin–electrode electrochemical interface (SEEI) models for traditional wet electrodes and textile electrodes were analyzed. Based on the SEEI models and YY/T 0196-2005 (Chinese YY/T pharmaceutical industry standard for disposable ECG electrode), three skin–electrode electrochemical characteristics (SEEC), including skin–electrode static impedance (SESI), skin–electrode alternating current impedance (SEAI), and skin–electrode polarization voltage (SEPV), were proposed. Then, three electrochemical evaluation methods for textile electrodes to skin were proposed and analyzed, which were the correlation between SEEC and skin–electrode contact pressure (SECP), skin–electrode relative movement (SERM), and conduction loss of active signals (CLAS). Finally, an electrochemical evaluation platform was set up based on an active simulated skin model (ASSM) and passive simulated skin model (PSSM). RESULTS: 9 feature parameters based on the passive electrochemical evaluation platform (PEEP) and 11 feature parameters based on the active electrochemical evaluation platform (AEEP) were obtained for evaluating textile electrodes. And four kinds of textile electrode characteristics including SEEC, SECP, SERM, and CLAS were quantitatively measured based on the electrochemical evaluation platform, and the testing accuracy and range for these characteristics were measured separately. Finally, correlation between SEEC and SECP for 10 kinds of textile electrode samples was studied, and 14 electrochemical characteristics and four skin–electrode contact pressure characteristics were extracted. Experimental results showed that significant correlations were found between six SEEC characteristics and SECP characteristics, and the correlation coefficient between ACI_3 and USECP was the highest. And the polarization voltages of most dry electrode samples showed a downward trend with the increase of contact pressure. CONCLUSIONS: The electrochemical evaluation platform yielded effective experimental data and could provide strong support for the evaluation and application of textile electrodes, which was also effective in evaluating other bioelectric electrodes such as 3M electrode, stainless steel electrode, dry electrode and microneedle electrode.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7216351
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72163512020-05-18 Electrochemical modeling and evaluation for textile electrodes to skin Song, Jinzhong Zhang, Yu Yang, Yijing Liu, Hao Zhou, Tianshu Zhang, Kui Li, Fan Xu, Zhi Liu, Qingjun Li, Jingsong Biomed Eng Online Research BACKGROUND: With the development of wearable health-monitoring technologies, a variety of textile electrodes have been produced and applied by researchers. However, there are no universal and effective methods even testing platforms for evaluating the skin–electrode electrochemical interface for textile electrodes because different human bodies have different skin characteristics. METHODS: An electrochemical modeling and evaluation for textile electrodes to skin was proposed, and two electrochemical evaluation platforms (EEP) were set up based on two simulated skin models (SSM). First, skin–electrode electrochemical interface (SEEI) models for traditional wet electrodes and textile electrodes were analyzed. Based on the SEEI models and YY/T 0196-2005 (Chinese YY/T pharmaceutical industry standard for disposable ECG electrode), three skin–electrode electrochemical characteristics (SEEC), including skin–electrode static impedance (SESI), skin–electrode alternating current impedance (SEAI), and skin–electrode polarization voltage (SEPV), were proposed. Then, three electrochemical evaluation methods for textile electrodes to skin were proposed and analyzed, which were the correlation between SEEC and skin–electrode contact pressure (SECP), skin–electrode relative movement (SERM), and conduction loss of active signals (CLAS). Finally, an electrochemical evaluation platform was set up based on an active simulated skin model (ASSM) and passive simulated skin model (PSSM). RESULTS: 9 feature parameters based on the passive electrochemical evaluation platform (PEEP) and 11 feature parameters based on the active electrochemical evaluation platform (AEEP) were obtained for evaluating textile electrodes. And four kinds of textile electrode characteristics including SEEC, SECP, SERM, and CLAS were quantitatively measured based on the electrochemical evaluation platform, and the testing accuracy and range for these characteristics were measured separately. Finally, correlation between SEEC and SECP for 10 kinds of textile electrode samples was studied, and 14 electrochemical characteristics and four skin–electrode contact pressure characteristics were extracted. Experimental results showed that significant correlations were found between six SEEC characteristics and SECP characteristics, and the correlation coefficient between ACI_3 and USECP was the highest. And the polarization voltages of most dry electrode samples showed a downward trend with the increase of contact pressure. CONCLUSIONS: The electrochemical evaluation platform yielded effective experimental data and could provide strong support for the evaluation and application of textile electrodes, which was also effective in evaluating other bioelectric electrodes such as 3M electrode, stainless steel electrode, dry electrode and microneedle electrode. BioMed Central 2020-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7216351/ /pubmed/32393332 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-020-00772-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Song, Jinzhong
Zhang, Yu
Yang, Yijing
Liu, Hao
Zhou, Tianshu
Zhang, Kui
Li, Fan
Xu, Zhi
Liu, Qingjun
Li, Jingsong
Electrochemical modeling and evaluation for textile electrodes to skin
title Electrochemical modeling and evaluation for textile electrodes to skin
title_full Electrochemical modeling and evaluation for textile electrodes to skin
title_fullStr Electrochemical modeling and evaluation for textile electrodes to skin
title_full_unstemmed Electrochemical modeling and evaluation for textile electrodes to skin
title_short Electrochemical modeling and evaluation for textile electrodes to skin
title_sort electrochemical modeling and evaluation for textile electrodes to skin
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7216351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32393332
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-020-00772-5
work_keys_str_mv AT songjinzhong electrochemicalmodelingandevaluationfortextileelectrodestoskin
AT zhangyu electrochemicalmodelingandevaluationfortextileelectrodestoskin
AT yangyijing electrochemicalmodelingandevaluationfortextileelectrodestoskin
AT liuhao electrochemicalmodelingandevaluationfortextileelectrodestoskin
AT zhoutianshu electrochemicalmodelingandevaluationfortextileelectrodestoskin
AT zhangkui electrochemicalmodelingandevaluationfortextileelectrodestoskin
AT lifan electrochemicalmodelingandevaluationfortextileelectrodestoskin
AT xuzhi electrochemicalmodelingandevaluationfortextileelectrodestoskin
AT liuqingjun electrochemicalmodelingandevaluationfortextileelectrodestoskin
AT lijingsong electrochemicalmodelingandevaluationfortextileelectrodestoskin