Cargando…

EAACI Task force Clinical epidemiology of anaphylaxis: experts’ perspective on the use of adrenaline autoinjectors in Europe

BACKGROUND: Worldwide, guidelines recommend the use of adrenaline autoinjectors (AAIs) for self-medication in patients who experience severe allergic reaction. The European Medical Agency recommends the prescription of two AAIs, which should be carried by patients at all times. The European Academy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kraft, Magdalena, Dölle-Bierke, Sabine, Turner, Paul J., Muraro, Antonella, Fernández-Rivas, Montserrat, Grabenhenrich, Linus, Worm, Margitta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7216364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32426107
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13601-020-00317-y
_version_ 1783532400448372736
author Kraft, Magdalena
Dölle-Bierke, Sabine
Turner, Paul J.
Muraro, Antonella
Fernández-Rivas, Montserrat
Grabenhenrich, Linus
Worm, Margitta
author_facet Kraft, Magdalena
Dölle-Bierke, Sabine
Turner, Paul J.
Muraro, Antonella
Fernández-Rivas, Montserrat
Grabenhenrich, Linus
Worm, Margitta
author_sort Kraft, Magdalena
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Worldwide, guidelines recommend the use of adrenaline autoinjectors (AAIs) for self-medication in patients who experience severe allergic reaction. The European Medical Agency recommends the prescription of two AAIs, which should be carried by patients at all times. The European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology guidelines propose to prescribe a second AAI under some defined conditions. In the present study, we aimed to examine the adherence to these guidelines and prescription behavior of allergy experts regarding the number of AAIs prescribed for a given patient. METHODS: A standardized questionnaire was applied to the participants of the 5th International Conference of the Network of Online Registration for Anaphylaxis (NORA e. V.). Twenty-six experts (medical doctors with at least 2 years of experience in the field of anaphylaxis) answered the questions regarding the number of autoinjectors prescribed and the reasons influencing their decisions. RESULTS: Sixty-eight percent of the experts usually prescribed one AAI, while 32% prescribed two. The pediatricians and physicians with less experience tended to prescribe two autoinjectors more frequently. The experts were more likely to prescribe two adrenaline autoinjectors if the patient was a child, had a previous severe reaction, had mastocytosis, asthma, cardiovascular disease, or high body weight, or lived far from the emergency department. CONCLUSION: Our data confirm the lack of consensus regarding the number of AAIs to prescribe. Despite the European Medical Agency recommendation, the majority of allergy experts prescribed one autoinjector per patient. However, under distinct circumstances (e.g. mastocytosis, asthma, excess body weight, a history of severe anaphylaxis, or restricted access to immediate emergency), experts tended to prescribe more AAIs, which is in accordance with the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology guidelines. [Image: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7216364
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72163642020-05-18 EAACI Task force Clinical epidemiology of anaphylaxis: experts’ perspective on the use of adrenaline autoinjectors in Europe Kraft, Magdalena Dölle-Bierke, Sabine Turner, Paul J. Muraro, Antonella Fernández-Rivas, Montserrat Grabenhenrich, Linus Worm, Margitta Clin Transl Allergy Research BACKGROUND: Worldwide, guidelines recommend the use of adrenaline autoinjectors (AAIs) for self-medication in patients who experience severe allergic reaction. The European Medical Agency recommends the prescription of two AAIs, which should be carried by patients at all times. The European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology guidelines propose to prescribe a second AAI under some defined conditions. In the present study, we aimed to examine the adherence to these guidelines and prescription behavior of allergy experts regarding the number of AAIs prescribed for a given patient. METHODS: A standardized questionnaire was applied to the participants of the 5th International Conference of the Network of Online Registration for Anaphylaxis (NORA e. V.). Twenty-six experts (medical doctors with at least 2 years of experience in the field of anaphylaxis) answered the questions regarding the number of autoinjectors prescribed and the reasons influencing their decisions. RESULTS: Sixty-eight percent of the experts usually prescribed one AAI, while 32% prescribed two. The pediatricians and physicians with less experience tended to prescribe two autoinjectors more frequently. The experts were more likely to prescribe two adrenaline autoinjectors if the patient was a child, had a previous severe reaction, had mastocytosis, asthma, cardiovascular disease, or high body weight, or lived far from the emergency department. CONCLUSION: Our data confirm the lack of consensus regarding the number of AAIs to prescribe. Despite the European Medical Agency recommendation, the majority of allergy experts prescribed one autoinjector per patient. However, under distinct circumstances (e.g. mastocytosis, asthma, excess body weight, a history of severe anaphylaxis, or restricted access to immediate emergency), experts tended to prescribe more AAIs, which is in accordance with the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology guidelines. [Image: see text] BioMed Central 2020-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7216364/ /pubmed/32426107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13601-020-00317-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Kraft, Magdalena
Dölle-Bierke, Sabine
Turner, Paul J.
Muraro, Antonella
Fernández-Rivas, Montserrat
Grabenhenrich, Linus
Worm, Margitta
EAACI Task force Clinical epidemiology of anaphylaxis: experts’ perspective on the use of adrenaline autoinjectors in Europe
title EAACI Task force Clinical epidemiology of anaphylaxis: experts’ perspective on the use of adrenaline autoinjectors in Europe
title_full EAACI Task force Clinical epidemiology of anaphylaxis: experts’ perspective on the use of adrenaline autoinjectors in Europe
title_fullStr EAACI Task force Clinical epidemiology of anaphylaxis: experts’ perspective on the use of adrenaline autoinjectors in Europe
title_full_unstemmed EAACI Task force Clinical epidemiology of anaphylaxis: experts’ perspective on the use of adrenaline autoinjectors in Europe
title_short EAACI Task force Clinical epidemiology of anaphylaxis: experts’ perspective on the use of adrenaline autoinjectors in Europe
title_sort eaaci task force clinical epidemiology of anaphylaxis: experts’ perspective on the use of adrenaline autoinjectors in europe
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7216364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32426107
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13601-020-00317-y
work_keys_str_mv AT kraftmagdalena eaacitaskforceclinicalepidemiologyofanaphylaxisexpertsperspectiveontheuseofadrenalineautoinjectorsineurope
AT dollebierkesabine eaacitaskforceclinicalepidemiologyofanaphylaxisexpertsperspectiveontheuseofadrenalineautoinjectorsineurope
AT turnerpaulj eaacitaskforceclinicalepidemiologyofanaphylaxisexpertsperspectiveontheuseofadrenalineautoinjectorsineurope
AT muraroantonella eaacitaskforceclinicalepidemiologyofanaphylaxisexpertsperspectiveontheuseofadrenalineautoinjectorsineurope
AT fernandezrivasmontserrat eaacitaskforceclinicalepidemiologyofanaphylaxisexpertsperspectiveontheuseofadrenalineautoinjectorsineurope
AT grabenhenrichlinus eaacitaskforceclinicalepidemiologyofanaphylaxisexpertsperspectiveontheuseofadrenalineautoinjectorsineurope
AT wormmargitta eaacitaskforceclinicalepidemiologyofanaphylaxisexpertsperspectiveontheuseofadrenalineautoinjectorsineurope