Cargando…

Model eggs fail to detect egg recognition in host populations after brood parasitism is relaxed

BACKGROUND: Obligate brood parasites exert strong selective pressure on target hosts. In response, hosts typically evolve anti-parasitism strategies, of which egg recognition is one of the most efficient. Generally, host egg-recognition capacity is determined using model eggs. Previous studies have...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Canchao, Wang, Longwu, Cheng, Shun-Jen, Hsu, Yu-Cheng, Møller, Anders Pape, Liang, Wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7216403/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32426018
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12983-020-00362-0
_version_ 1783532409101221888
author Yang, Canchao
Wang, Longwu
Cheng, Shun-Jen
Hsu, Yu-Cheng
Møller, Anders Pape
Liang, Wei
author_facet Yang, Canchao
Wang, Longwu
Cheng, Shun-Jen
Hsu, Yu-Cheng
Møller, Anders Pape
Liang, Wei
author_sort Yang, Canchao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Obligate brood parasites exert strong selective pressure on target hosts. In response, hosts typically evolve anti-parasitism strategies, of which egg recognition is one of the most efficient. Generally, host egg-recognition capacity is determined using model eggs. Previous studies have shown that some host species, which are capable of detecting parasite eggs, do not reject model eggs. However, it is unknown that whether the reaction to model eggs varies among distinct populations of the same host in relation to the degree of parasitism pressure. RESULTS: Here, we compared the rejection frequencies of model eggs and real eggs between mainland and island populations of the plain prinia (Prinia inornata), which are respectively sympatric and allopatric with their brood parasite, the common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus). Our results indicated that the mainland and island populations rejected real eggs at similar rates, but rejected model eggs, which were similar in size to real eggs but heavier, at significantly different rates: the island population rejected fewer model eggs, possibly because the rejection motivation of this population was lower due to absence of parasitism. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicated that some factors affecting the decision to reject, such as rejection motivation, varied according to the degree of parasitism pressure, and thus influenced the frequency of egg rejection. Furthermore, our results suggested that model eggs should be used with caution in comparative studies of egg recognition abilities among species or populations subjected to different intensities of brood parasitism. That is, model eggs may fail to accurately detect egg recognition in host populations with little to no risk of parasitism.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7216403
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72164032020-05-18 Model eggs fail to detect egg recognition in host populations after brood parasitism is relaxed Yang, Canchao Wang, Longwu Cheng, Shun-Jen Hsu, Yu-Cheng Møller, Anders Pape Liang, Wei Front Zool Research BACKGROUND: Obligate brood parasites exert strong selective pressure on target hosts. In response, hosts typically evolve anti-parasitism strategies, of which egg recognition is one of the most efficient. Generally, host egg-recognition capacity is determined using model eggs. Previous studies have shown that some host species, which are capable of detecting parasite eggs, do not reject model eggs. However, it is unknown that whether the reaction to model eggs varies among distinct populations of the same host in relation to the degree of parasitism pressure. RESULTS: Here, we compared the rejection frequencies of model eggs and real eggs between mainland and island populations of the plain prinia (Prinia inornata), which are respectively sympatric and allopatric with their brood parasite, the common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus). Our results indicated that the mainland and island populations rejected real eggs at similar rates, but rejected model eggs, which were similar in size to real eggs but heavier, at significantly different rates: the island population rejected fewer model eggs, possibly because the rejection motivation of this population was lower due to absence of parasitism. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicated that some factors affecting the decision to reject, such as rejection motivation, varied according to the degree of parasitism pressure, and thus influenced the frequency of egg rejection. Furthermore, our results suggested that model eggs should be used with caution in comparative studies of egg recognition abilities among species or populations subjected to different intensities of brood parasitism. That is, model eggs may fail to accurately detect egg recognition in host populations with little to no risk of parasitism. BioMed Central 2020-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7216403/ /pubmed/32426018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12983-020-00362-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Yang, Canchao
Wang, Longwu
Cheng, Shun-Jen
Hsu, Yu-Cheng
Møller, Anders Pape
Liang, Wei
Model eggs fail to detect egg recognition in host populations after brood parasitism is relaxed
title Model eggs fail to detect egg recognition in host populations after brood parasitism is relaxed
title_full Model eggs fail to detect egg recognition in host populations after brood parasitism is relaxed
title_fullStr Model eggs fail to detect egg recognition in host populations after brood parasitism is relaxed
title_full_unstemmed Model eggs fail to detect egg recognition in host populations after brood parasitism is relaxed
title_short Model eggs fail to detect egg recognition in host populations after brood parasitism is relaxed
title_sort model eggs fail to detect egg recognition in host populations after brood parasitism is relaxed
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7216403/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32426018
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12983-020-00362-0
work_keys_str_mv AT yangcanchao modeleggsfailtodetecteggrecognitioninhostpopulationsafterbroodparasitismisrelaxed
AT wanglongwu modeleggsfailtodetecteggrecognitioninhostpopulationsafterbroodparasitismisrelaxed
AT chengshunjen modeleggsfailtodetecteggrecognitioninhostpopulationsafterbroodparasitismisrelaxed
AT hsuyucheng modeleggsfailtodetecteggrecognitioninhostpopulationsafterbroodparasitismisrelaxed
AT mølleranderspape modeleggsfailtodetecteggrecognitioninhostpopulationsafterbroodparasitismisrelaxed
AT liangwei modeleggsfailtodetecteggrecognitioninhostpopulationsafterbroodparasitismisrelaxed