Cargando…

How do 66 European institutional review boards approve one protocol for an international prospective observational study on traumatic brain injury? Experiences from the CENTER-TBI study

BACKGROUND: The European Union (EU) aims to optimize patient protection and efficiency of health-care research by harmonizing procedures across Member States. Nonetheless, further improvements are required to increase multicenter research efficiency. We investigated IRB procedures in a large prospec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Timmers, Marjolein, van Dijck, Jeroen T. J. M., van Wijk, Roel P. J., Legrand, Valerie, van Veen, Ernest, Maas, Andrew I. R., Menon, David K., Citerio, Giuseppe, Stocchetti, Nino, Kompanje, Erwin J. O.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7216427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32398066
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-00480-8
_version_ 1783532413314400256
author Timmers, Marjolein
van Dijck, Jeroen T. J. M.
van Wijk, Roel P. J.
Legrand, Valerie
van Veen, Ernest
Maas, Andrew I. R.
Menon, David K.
Citerio, Giuseppe
Stocchetti, Nino
Kompanje, Erwin J. O.
author_facet Timmers, Marjolein
van Dijck, Jeroen T. J. M.
van Wijk, Roel P. J.
Legrand, Valerie
van Veen, Ernest
Maas, Andrew I. R.
Menon, David K.
Citerio, Giuseppe
Stocchetti, Nino
Kompanje, Erwin J. O.
author_sort Timmers, Marjolein
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The European Union (EU) aims to optimize patient protection and efficiency of health-care research by harmonizing procedures across Member States. Nonetheless, further improvements are required to increase multicenter research efficiency. We investigated IRB procedures in a large prospective European multicenter study on traumatic brain injury (TBI), aiming to inform and stimulate initiatives to improve efficiency. METHODS: We reviewed relevant documents regarding IRB submission and IRB approval from European neurotrauma centers participating in the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI). Documents included detailed information on IRB procedures and the duration from IRB submission until approval(s). They were translated and analyzed to determine the level of harmonization of IRB procedures within Europe. RESULTS: From 18 countries, 66 centers provided the requested documents. The primary IRB review was conducted centrally (N = 11, 61%) or locally (N = 7, 39%) and primary IRB approval was obtained after one (N = 8, 44%), two (N = 6, 33%) or three (N = 4, 23%) review rounds with a median duration of respectively 50 and 98 days until primary IRB approval. Additional IRB approval was required in 55% of countries and could increase duration to 535 days. Total duration from submission until required IRB approval was obtained was 114 days (IQR 75–224) and appeared to be shorter after submission to local IRBs compared to central IRBs (50 vs. 138 days, p = 0.0074). CONCLUSION: We found variation in IRB procedures between and within European countries. There were differences in submission and approval requirements, number of review rounds and total duration. Research collaborations could benefit from the implementation of more uniform legislation and regulation while acknowledging local cultural habits and moral values between countries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7216427
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72164272020-05-18 How do 66 European institutional review boards approve one protocol for an international prospective observational study on traumatic brain injury? Experiences from the CENTER-TBI study Timmers, Marjolein van Dijck, Jeroen T. J. M. van Wijk, Roel P. J. Legrand, Valerie van Veen, Ernest Maas, Andrew I. R. Menon, David K. Citerio, Giuseppe Stocchetti, Nino Kompanje, Erwin J. O. BMC Med Ethics Research Article BACKGROUND: The European Union (EU) aims to optimize patient protection and efficiency of health-care research by harmonizing procedures across Member States. Nonetheless, further improvements are required to increase multicenter research efficiency. We investigated IRB procedures in a large prospective European multicenter study on traumatic brain injury (TBI), aiming to inform and stimulate initiatives to improve efficiency. METHODS: We reviewed relevant documents regarding IRB submission and IRB approval from European neurotrauma centers participating in the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI). Documents included detailed information on IRB procedures and the duration from IRB submission until approval(s). They were translated and analyzed to determine the level of harmonization of IRB procedures within Europe. RESULTS: From 18 countries, 66 centers provided the requested documents. The primary IRB review was conducted centrally (N = 11, 61%) or locally (N = 7, 39%) and primary IRB approval was obtained after one (N = 8, 44%), two (N = 6, 33%) or three (N = 4, 23%) review rounds with a median duration of respectively 50 and 98 days until primary IRB approval. Additional IRB approval was required in 55% of countries and could increase duration to 535 days. Total duration from submission until required IRB approval was obtained was 114 days (IQR 75–224) and appeared to be shorter after submission to local IRBs compared to central IRBs (50 vs. 138 days, p = 0.0074). CONCLUSION: We found variation in IRB procedures between and within European countries. There were differences in submission and approval requirements, number of review rounds and total duration. Research collaborations could benefit from the implementation of more uniform legislation and regulation while acknowledging local cultural habits and moral values between countries. BioMed Central 2020-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7216427/ /pubmed/32398066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-00480-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Timmers, Marjolein
van Dijck, Jeroen T. J. M.
van Wijk, Roel P. J.
Legrand, Valerie
van Veen, Ernest
Maas, Andrew I. R.
Menon, David K.
Citerio, Giuseppe
Stocchetti, Nino
Kompanje, Erwin J. O.
How do 66 European institutional review boards approve one protocol for an international prospective observational study on traumatic brain injury? Experiences from the CENTER-TBI study
title How do 66 European institutional review boards approve one protocol for an international prospective observational study on traumatic brain injury? Experiences from the CENTER-TBI study
title_full How do 66 European institutional review boards approve one protocol for an international prospective observational study on traumatic brain injury? Experiences from the CENTER-TBI study
title_fullStr How do 66 European institutional review boards approve one protocol for an international prospective observational study on traumatic brain injury? Experiences from the CENTER-TBI study
title_full_unstemmed How do 66 European institutional review boards approve one protocol for an international prospective observational study on traumatic brain injury? Experiences from the CENTER-TBI study
title_short How do 66 European institutional review boards approve one protocol for an international prospective observational study on traumatic brain injury? Experiences from the CENTER-TBI study
title_sort how do 66 european institutional review boards approve one protocol for an international prospective observational study on traumatic brain injury? experiences from the center-tbi study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7216427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32398066
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-00480-8
work_keys_str_mv AT timmersmarjolein howdo66europeaninstitutionalreviewboardsapproveoneprotocolforaninternationalprospectiveobservationalstudyontraumaticbraininjuryexperiencesfromthecentertbistudy
AT vandijckjeroentjm howdo66europeaninstitutionalreviewboardsapproveoneprotocolforaninternationalprospectiveobservationalstudyontraumaticbraininjuryexperiencesfromthecentertbistudy
AT vanwijkroelpj howdo66europeaninstitutionalreviewboardsapproveoneprotocolforaninternationalprospectiveobservationalstudyontraumaticbraininjuryexperiencesfromthecentertbistudy
AT legrandvalerie howdo66europeaninstitutionalreviewboardsapproveoneprotocolforaninternationalprospectiveobservationalstudyontraumaticbraininjuryexperiencesfromthecentertbistudy
AT vanveenernest howdo66europeaninstitutionalreviewboardsapproveoneprotocolforaninternationalprospectiveobservationalstudyontraumaticbraininjuryexperiencesfromthecentertbistudy
AT maasandrewir howdo66europeaninstitutionalreviewboardsapproveoneprotocolforaninternationalprospectiveobservationalstudyontraumaticbraininjuryexperiencesfromthecentertbistudy
AT menondavidk howdo66europeaninstitutionalreviewboardsapproveoneprotocolforaninternationalprospectiveobservationalstudyontraumaticbraininjuryexperiencesfromthecentertbistudy
AT citeriogiuseppe howdo66europeaninstitutionalreviewboardsapproveoneprotocolforaninternationalprospectiveobservationalstudyontraumaticbraininjuryexperiencesfromthecentertbistudy
AT stocchettinino howdo66europeaninstitutionalreviewboardsapproveoneprotocolforaninternationalprospectiveobservationalstudyontraumaticbraininjuryexperiencesfromthecentertbistudy
AT kompanjeerwinjo howdo66europeaninstitutionalreviewboardsapproveoneprotocolforaninternationalprospectiveobservationalstudyontraumaticbraininjuryexperiencesfromthecentertbistudy
AT howdo66europeaninstitutionalreviewboardsapproveoneprotocolforaninternationalprospectiveobservationalstudyontraumaticbraininjuryexperiencesfromthecentertbistudy