Cargando…
How do 66 European institutional review boards approve one protocol for an international prospective observational study on traumatic brain injury? Experiences from the CENTER-TBI study
BACKGROUND: The European Union (EU) aims to optimize patient protection and efficiency of health-care research by harmonizing procedures across Member States. Nonetheless, further improvements are required to increase multicenter research efficiency. We investigated IRB procedures in a large prospec...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7216427/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32398066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-00480-8 |
_version_ | 1783532413314400256 |
---|---|
author | Timmers, Marjolein van Dijck, Jeroen T. J. M. van Wijk, Roel P. J. Legrand, Valerie van Veen, Ernest Maas, Andrew I. R. Menon, David K. Citerio, Giuseppe Stocchetti, Nino Kompanje, Erwin J. O. |
author_facet | Timmers, Marjolein van Dijck, Jeroen T. J. M. van Wijk, Roel P. J. Legrand, Valerie van Veen, Ernest Maas, Andrew I. R. Menon, David K. Citerio, Giuseppe Stocchetti, Nino Kompanje, Erwin J. O. |
author_sort | Timmers, Marjolein |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The European Union (EU) aims to optimize patient protection and efficiency of health-care research by harmonizing procedures across Member States. Nonetheless, further improvements are required to increase multicenter research efficiency. We investigated IRB procedures in a large prospective European multicenter study on traumatic brain injury (TBI), aiming to inform and stimulate initiatives to improve efficiency. METHODS: We reviewed relevant documents regarding IRB submission and IRB approval from European neurotrauma centers participating in the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI). Documents included detailed information on IRB procedures and the duration from IRB submission until approval(s). They were translated and analyzed to determine the level of harmonization of IRB procedures within Europe. RESULTS: From 18 countries, 66 centers provided the requested documents. The primary IRB review was conducted centrally (N = 11, 61%) or locally (N = 7, 39%) and primary IRB approval was obtained after one (N = 8, 44%), two (N = 6, 33%) or three (N = 4, 23%) review rounds with a median duration of respectively 50 and 98 days until primary IRB approval. Additional IRB approval was required in 55% of countries and could increase duration to 535 days. Total duration from submission until required IRB approval was obtained was 114 days (IQR 75–224) and appeared to be shorter after submission to local IRBs compared to central IRBs (50 vs. 138 days, p = 0.0074). CONCLUSION: We found variation in IRB procedures between and within European countries. There were differences in submission and approval requirements, number of review rounds and total duration. Research collaborations could benefit from the implementation of more uniform legislation and regulation while acknowledging local cultural habits and moral values between countries. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7216427 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72164272020-05-18 How do 66 European institutional review boards approve one protocol for an international prospective observational study on traumatic brain injury? Experiences from the CENTER-TBI study Timmers, Marjolein van Dijck, Jeroen T. J. M. van Wijk, Roel P. J. Legrand, Valerie van Veen, Ernest Maas, Andrew I. R. Menon, David K. Citerio, Giuseppe Stocchetti, Nino Kompanje, Erwin J. O. BMC Med Ethics Research Article BACKGROUND: The European Union (EU) aims to optimize patient protection and efficiency of health-care research by harmonizing procedures across Member States. Nonetheless, further improvements are required to increase multicenter research efficiency. We investigated IRB procedures in a large prospective European multicenter study on traumatic brain injury (TBI), aiming to inform and stimulate initiatives to improve efficiency. METHODS: We reviewed relevant documents regarding IRB submission and IRB approval from European neurotrauma centers participating in the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI). Documents included detailed information on IRB procedures and the duration from IRB submission until approval(s). They were translated and analyzed to determine the level of harmonization of IRB procedures within Europe. RESULTS: From 18 countries, 66 centers provided the requested documents. The primary IRB review was conducted centrally (N = 11, 61%) or locally (N = 7, 39%) and primary IRB approval was obtained after one (N = 8, 44%), two (N = 6, 33%) or three (N = 4, 23%) review rounds with a median duration of respectively 50 and 98 days until primary IRB approval. Additional IRB approval was required in 55% of countries and could increase duration to 535 days. Total duration from submission until required IRB approval was obtained was 114 days (IQR 75–224) and appeared to be shorter after submission to local IRBs compared to central IRBs (50 vs. 138 days, p = 0.0074). CONCLUSION: We found variation in IRB procedures between and within European countries. There were differences in submission and approval requirements, number of review rounds and total duration. Research collaborations could benefit from the implementation of more uniform legislation and regulation while acknowledging local cultural habits and moral values between countries. BioMed Central 2020-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7216427/ /pubmed/32398066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-00480-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Timmers, Marjolein van Dijck, Jeroen T. J. M. van Wijk, Roel P. J. Legrand, Valerie van Veen, Ernest Maas, Andrew I. R. Menon, David K. Citerio, Giuseppe Stocchetti, Nino Kompanje, Erwin J. O. How do 66 European institutional review boards approve one protocol for an international prospective observational study on traumatic brain injury? Experiences from the CENTER-TBI study |
title | How do 66 European institutional review boards approve one protocol for an international prospective observational study on traumatic brain injury? Experiences from the CENTER-TBI study |
title_full | How do 66 European institutional review boards approve one protocol for an international prospective observational study on traumatic brain injury? Experiences from the CENTER-TBI study |
title_fullStr | How do 66 European institutional review boards approve one protocol for an international prospective observational study on traumatic brain injury? Experiences from the CENTER-TBI study |
title_full_unstemmed | How do 66 European institutional review boards approve one protocol for an international prospective observational study on traumatic brain injury? Experiences from the CENTER-TBI study |
title_short | How do 66 European institutional review boards approve one protocol for an international prospective observational study on traumatic brain injury? Experiences from the CENTER-TBI study |
title_sort | how do 66 european institutional review boards approve one protocol for an international prospective observational study on traumatic brain injury? experiences from the center-tbi study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7216427/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32398066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-00480-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT timmersmarjolein howdo66europeaninstitutionalreviewboardsapproveoneprotocolforaninternationalprospectiveobservationalstudyontraumaticbraininjuryexperiencesfromthecentertbistudy AT vandijckjeroentjm howdo66europeaninstitutionalreviewboardsapproveoneprotocolforaninternationalprospectiveobservationalstudyontraumaticbraininjuryexperiencesfromthecentertbistudy AT vanwijkroelpj howdo66europeaninstitutionalreviewboardsapproveoneprotocolforaninternationalprospectiveobservationalstudyontraumaticbraininjuryexperiencesfromthecentertbistudy AT legrandvalerie howdo66europeaninstitutionalreviewboardsapproveoneprotocolforaninternationalprospectiveobservationalstudyontraumaticbraininjuryexperiencesfromthecentertbistudy AT vanveenernest howdo66europeaninstitutionalreviewboardsapproveoneprotocolforaninternationalprospectiveobservationalstudyontraumaticbraininjuryexperiencesfromthecentertbistudy AT maasandrewir howdo66europeaninstitutionalreviewboardsapproveoneprotocolforaninternationalprospectiveobservationalstudyontraumaticbraininjuryexperiencesfromthecentertbistudy AT menondavidk howdo66europeaninstitutionalreviewboardsapproveoneprotocolforaninternationalprospectiveobservationalstudyontraumaticbraininjuryexperiencesfromthecentertbistudy AT citeriogiuseppe howdo66europeaninstitutionalreviewboardsapproveoneprotocolforaninternationalprospectiveobservationalstudyontraumaticbraininjuryexperiencesfromthecentertbistudy AT stocchettinino howdo66europeaninstitutionalreviewboardsapproveoneprotocolforaninternationalprospectiveobservationalstudyontraumaticbraininjuryexperiencesfromthecentertbistudy AT kompanjeerwinjo howdo66europeaninstitutionalreviewboardsapproveoneprotocolforaninternationalprospectiveobservationalstudyontraumaticbraininjuryexperiencesfromthecentertbistudy AT howdo66europeaninstitutionalreviewboardsapproveoneprotocolforaninternationalprospectiveobservationalstudyontraumaticbraininjuryexperiencesfromthecentertbistudy |