Cargando…
Effects of co-exposure to CS(2) and noise on hearing and balance in rats: continuous versus intermittent CS(2) exposures
BACKGROUND: Carbon disulfide (CS(2)) exacerbates the effect of noise on hearing, and disrupts the vestibular system. The goal of this study was to determine whether these effects are also observed with intermittent CS(2) exposure. METHODS: Rats were exposed for 4 weeks (5 days/week, 6 h/day) to a ba...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7216478/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32426022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12995-020-00260-5 |
_version_ | 1783532418595028992 |
---|---|
author | Chalansonnet, Monique Carreres-Pons, Maria Venet, Thomas Thomas, Aurélie Merlen, Lise Boucard, Stéphane Cosnier, Frédéric Nunge, Hervé Bonfanti, Elodie Llorens, Jordi Campo, Pierre Pouyatos, Benoît |
author_facet | Chalansonnet, Monique Carreres-Pons, Maria Venet, Thomas Thomas, Aurélie Merlen, Lise Boucard, Stéphane Cosnier, Frédéric Nunge, Hervé Bonfanti, Elodie Llorens, Jordi Campo, Pierre Pouyatos, Benoît |
author_sort | Chalansonnet, Monique |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Carbon disulfide (CS(2)) exacerbates the effect of noise on hearing, and disrupts the vestibular system. The goal of this study was to determine whether these effects are also observed with intermittent CS(2) exposure. METHODS: Rats were exposed for 4 weeks (5 days/week, 6 h/day) to a band noise at 106 dB SPL either alone or combined with continuous (63 ppm or 250 ppm) or intermittent (15 min/h or 2 × 15 min/h at 250 ppm) CS(2). Hearing function was assessed by measuring distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs); balance was monitored based on the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR). Functional measurements were performed before, at the end of exposure and 4 weeks later. Histological analyses of the inner ear were also performed following exposure and after the 4-week recovery period. RESULTS: The results obtained here confirmed that CS(2) exposure exerts two differential temporary effects on hearing: (1) it attenuates the noise-induced DPOAE decrease below 6 kHz probably through action on the middle ear reflex when exposure lasts 15 min per hour, and (2) continuous exposure to 250 ppm for 6 h extends the frequency range affected by noise up to 9.6 kHz (instead of 6 kHz with noise alone). With regard to balance, the VOR was reversibly disrupted at the two highest doses of CS(2) (2 × 15 min/h and continuous 250 ppm). No morphological alterations to the inner ear were observed. CONCLUSION: These results reveal that short periods of CS(2) exposure can alter the sensitivity of the cochlea to noise at a dose equivalent to only 10 times the short-term occupational limit value, and intermittent exposure to CS(2) (2 × 15 min/h) can alter the function of the vestibular system. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7216478 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72164782020-05-18 Effects of co-exposure to CS(2) and noise on hearing and balance in rats: continuous versus intermittent CS(2) exposures Chalansonnet, Monique Carreres-Pons, Maria Venet, Thomas Thomas, Aurélie Merlen, Lise Boucard, Stéphane Cosnier, Frédéric Nunge, Hervé Bonfanti, Elodie Llorens, Jordi Campo, Pierre Pouyatos, Benoît J Occup Med Toxicol Research BACKGROUND: Carbon disulfide (CS(2)) exacerbates the effect of noise on hearing, and disrupts the vestibular system. The goal of this study was to determine whether these effects are also observed with intermittent CS(2) exposure. METHODS: Rats were exposed for 4 weeks (5 days/week, 6 h/day) to a band noise at 106 dB SPL either alone or combined with continuous (63 ppm or 250 ppm) or intermittent (15 min/h or 2 × 15 min/h at 250 ppm) CS(2). Hearing function was assessed by measuring distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs); balance was monitored based on the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR). Functional measurements were performed before, at the end of exposure and 4 weeks later. Histological analyses of the inner ear were also performed following exposure and after the 4-week recovery period. RESULTS: The results obtained here confirmed that CS(2) exposure exerts two differential temporary effects on hearing: (1) it attenuates the noise-induced DPOAE decrease below 6 kHz probably through action on the middle ear reflex when exposure lasts 15 min per hour, and (2) continuous exposure to 250 ppm for 6 h extends the frequency range affected by noise up to 9.6 kHz (instead of 6 kHz with noise alone). With regard to balance, the VOR was reversibly disrupted at the two highest doses of CS(2) (2 × 15 min/h and continuous 250 ppm). No morphological alterations to the inner ear were observed. CONCLUSION: These results reveal that short periods of CS(2) exposure can alter the sensitivity of the cochlea to noise at a dose equivalent to only 10 times the short-term occupational limit value, and intermittent exposure to CS(2) (2 × 15 min/h) can alter the function of the vestibular system. BioMed Central 2020-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7216478/ /pubmed/32426022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12995-020-00260-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Chalansonnet, Monique Carreres-Pons, Maria Venet, Thomas Thomas, Aurélie Merlen, Lise Boucard, Stéphane Cosnier, Frédéric Nunge, Hervé Bonfanti, Elodie Llorens, Jordi Campo, Pierre Pouyatos, Benoît Effects of co-exposure to CS(2) and noise on hearing and balance in rats: continuous versus intermittent CS(2) exposures |
title | Effects of co-exposure to CS(2) and noise on hearing and balance in rats: continuous versus intermittent CS(2) exposures |
title_full | Effects of co-exposure to CS(2) and noise on hearing and balance in rats: continuous versus intermittent CS(2) exposures |
title_fullStr | Effects of co-exposure to CS(2) and noise on hearing and balance in rats: continuous versus intermittent CS(2) exposures |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of co-exposure to CS(2) and noise on hearing and balance in rats: continuous versus intermittent CS(2) exposures |
title_short | Effects of co-exposure to CS(2) and noise on hearing and balance in rats: continuous versus intermittent CS(2) exposures |
title_sort | effects of co-exposure to cs(2) and noise on hearing and balance in rats: continuous versus intermittent cs(2) exposures |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7216478/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32426022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12995-020-00260-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chalansonnetmonique effectsofcoexposuretocs2andnoiseonhearingandbalanceinratscontinuousversusintermittentcs2exposures AT carreresponsmaria effectsofcoexposuretocs2andnoiseonhearingandbalanceinratscontinuousversusintermittentcs2exposures AT venetthomas effectsofcoexposuretocs2andnoiseonhearingandbalanceinratscontinuousversusintermittentcs2exposures AT thomasaurelie effectsofcoexposuretocs2andnoiseonhearingandbalanceinratscontinuousversusintermittentcs2exposures AT merlenlise effectsofcoexposuretocs2andnoiseonhearingandbalanceinratscontinuousversusintermittentcs2exposures AT boucardstephane effectsofcoexposuretocs2andnoiseonhearingandbalanceinratscontinuousversusintermittentcs2exposures AT cosnierfrederic effectsofcoexposuretocs2andnoiseonhearingandbalanceinratscontinuousversusintermittentcs2exposures AT nungeherve effectsofcoexposuretocs2andnoiseonhearingandbalanceinratscontinuousversusintermittentcs2exposures AT bonfantielodie effectsofcoexposuretocs2andnoiseonhearingandbalanceinratscontinuousversusintermittentcs2exposures AT llorensjordi effectsofcoexposuretocs2andnoiseonhearingandbalanceinratscontinuousversusintermittentcs2exposures AT campopierre effectsofcoexposuretocs2andnoiseonhearingandbalanceinratscontinuousversusintermittentcs2exposures AT pouyatosbenoit effectsofcoexposuretocs2andnoiseonhearingandbalanceinratscontinuousversusintermittentcs2exposures |