Cargando…
A mixed methods case study investigating how randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are reported, understood and interpreted in practice
BACKGROUND: While randomised controlled trials (RCTs) provide high-quality evidence to guide practice, much routine care is not based upon available RCTs. This disconnect between evidence and practice is not sufficiently well understood. This case study explores this relationship using a novel appro...
Autores principales: | Byrne, Ben E., Rooshenas, Leila, Lambert, Helen S., Blazeby, Jane M. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7216481/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32398100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01009-8 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Equipoise in action: a qualitative investigation across six pragmatic randomised controlled trials (RCTs)
por: Rooshenas, Leila, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Evidence into practice: protocol for a new mixed-methods approach to explore the relationship between trials evidence and clinical practice through systematic identification and analysis of articles citing randomised controlled trials
por: Byrne, Benjamin E, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Development of a framework to improve the process of recruitment to randomised controlled trials (RCTs): the SEAR (Screened, Eligible, Approached, Randomised) framework
por: Wilson, Caroline, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Methods for standardising and monitoring surgical interventions in RCTs
por: Blencowe, Natalie, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
How can pilot work optimally inform surgical RCTs? A review of current evidence
por: Fairhurst, Katherine, et al.
Publicado: (2015)