Cargando…
Reliability and validity of a novel Kinect-based software program for measuring a single leg squat
BACKGROUND: The Single leg squat (SLS) is a movement screening test widely used in clinical settings. The SLS is highly subjective in its nature. Objective measures, such as 3D-motion analyses, are seldom used in daily clinical work. An interactive, Kinect-based 3D-movement analysis system, the Qine...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7216608/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32426141 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-020-00179-8 |
_version_ | 1783532446094983168 |
---|---|
author | Ressman, John Rasmussen-Barr, Eva Grooten, Wilhelmus Johannes Andreas |
author_facet | Ressman, John Rasmussen-Barr, Eva Grooten, Wilhelmus Johannes Andreas |
author_sort | Ressman, John |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Single leg squat (SLS) is a movement screening test widely used in clinical settings. The SLS is highly subjective in its nature. Objective measures, such as 3D-motion analyses, are seldom used in daily clinical work. An interactive, Kinect-based 3D-movement analysis system, the Qinematic™, is proposed to be easily used in clinical settings to assess the SLS. The aim of this study was to establish the test-retest reliability and construct validity of Qinematic™ for assessing the SLS. A further aim was to identify angles of medial knee displacement, to summarise the discriminative ability of the SLS measured by Qinematic™. METHODS: We performed a test-retest reliability study (n = 37) of the SLS using Qinematic™ and a construct validity study, in which Qinematic™ data were compared with visual assessment of video-recorded SLS. RESULTS: Three variables (left knee down, right knee up and down) reached “substantial reliability” (ICC = 0.64–0.69). One variable, “left knee up”, showed a significant difference between the two test occasions (T1–6.34°, T2 0.66°, p = 0.013, ICC = 0.50), and “poor absolute reliability” was seen for all variables (SEM = 9.04–10.66, SDC = 25.06–29.55). A moderate agreement between the visual assessment and Qinematic™ data for various knee angles was shown (Kappa = 0.45–0.58). The best discriminative ability of the SLS was found at a knee angle of 6° (AUC = 0.82, sensitivity = 0.86, specificity = 0.78, PPV = 0.58, NPV = 0.94). CONCLUSIONS: Qinematic™ shows a poor absolute reliability, and a substantial relative reliability, in measuring a SLS at the way down. This indicates that Qinematic™ should not be recommended for the use on an individual level, but it can possibly be used on a group level. The merged results of the construct validity study indicate that Qinematic™ at 6° of medial displacement can identify subjects with a knee over foot position. In summary, the use of the Qinematic™ net trajectory angle, which estimates the “line of best fit” cannot be recommended to assess a knee medial to foot position and should be reconsidered. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7216608 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72166082020-05-18 Reliability and validity of a novel Kinect-based software program for measuring a single leg squat Ressman, John Rasmussen-Barr, Eva Grooten, Wilhelmus Johannes Andreas BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil Research Article BACKGROUND: The Single leg squat (SLS) is a movement screening test widely used in clinical settings. The SLS is highly subjective in its nature. Objective measures, such as 3D-motion analyses, are seldom used in daily clinical work. An interactive, Kinect-based 3D-movement analysis system, the Qinematic™, is proposed to be easily used in clinical settings to assess the SLS. The aim of this study was to establish the test-retest reliability and construct validity of Qinematic™ for assessing the SLS. A further aim was to identify angles of medial knee displacement, to summarise the discriminative ability of the SLS measured by Qinematic™. METHODS: We performed a test-retest reliability study (n = 37) of the SLS using Qinematic™ and a construct validity study, in which Qinematic™ data were compared with visual assessment of video-recorded SLS. RESULTS: Three variables (left knee down, right knee up and down) reached “substantial reliability” (ICC = 0.64–0.69). One variable, “left knee up”, showed a significant difference between the two test occasions (T1–6.34°, T2 0.66°, p = 0.013, ICC = 0.50), and “poor absolute reliability” was seen for all variables (SEM = 9.04–10.66, SDC = 25.06–29.55). A moderate agreement between the visual assessment and Qinematic™ data for various knee angles was shown (Kappa = 0.45–0.58). The best discriminative ability of the SLS was found at a knee angle of 6° (AUC = 0.82, sensitivity = 0.86, specificity = 0.78, PPV = 0.58, NPV = 0.94). CONCLUSIONS: Qinematic™ shows a poor absolute reliability, and a substantial relative reliability, in measuring a SLS at the way down. This indicates that Qinematic™ should not be recommended for the use on an individual level, but it can possibly be used on a group level. The merged results of the construct validity study indicate that Qinematic™ at 6° of medial displacement can identify subjects with a knee over foot position. In summary, the use of the Qinematic™ net trajectory angle, which estimates the “line of best fit” cannot be recommended to assess a knee medial to foot position and should be reconsidered. BioMed Central 2020-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7216608/ /pubmed/32426141 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-020-00179-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ressman, John Rasmussen-Barr, Eva Grooten, Wilhelmus Johannes Andreas Reliability and validity of a novel Kinect-based software program for measuring a single leg squat |
title | Reliability and validity of a novel Kinect-based software program for measuring a single leg squat |
title_full | Reliability and validity of a novel Kinect-based software program for measuring a single leg squat |
title_fullStr | Reliability and validity of a novel Kinect-based software program for measuring a single leg squat |
title_full_unstemmed | Reliability and validity of a novel Kinect-based software program for measuring a single leg squat |
title_short | Reliability and validity of a novel Kinect-based software program for measuring a single leg squat |
title_sort | reliability and validity of a novel kinect-based software program for measuring a single leg squat |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7216608/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32426141 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-020-00179-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ressmanjohn reliabilityandvalidityofanovelkinectbasedsoftwareprogramformeasuringasinglelegsquat AT rasmussenbarreva reliabilityandvalidityofanovelkinectbasedsoftwareprogramformeasuringasinglelegsquat AT grootenwilhelmusjohannesandreas reliabilityandvalidityofanovelkinectbasedsoftwareprogramformeasuringasinglelegsquat |