Cargando…
Short-term outcomes of on- vs off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with left ventricular dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
OBJECTIVES: Does the manipulation of the off-pump CABG (OPCAB) in patient with depressed left ventricular function is better than on-pump CABG (ONCAB) approach in in-hospital mortality and morbidities? Here we undertook a meta-analysis of the best evidence available on the comparison of primary and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7216614/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32393284 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-020-01115-0 |
_version_ | 1783532447540969472 |
---|---|
author | Guan, Zhiyuan Guan, Xiaoqing Gu, Kaiyun Lin, Xuanqi Lin, Jin Zhou, Wenjun Xu, Ming Wan, Fen Zhang, Zhe Song, Chunli |
author_facet | Guan, Zhiyuan Guan, Xiaoqing Gu, Kaiyun Lin, Xuanqi Lin, Jin Zhou, Wenjun Xu, Ming Wan, Fen Zhang, Zhe Song, Chunli |
author_sort | Guan, Zhiyuan |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Does the manipulation of the off-pump CABG (OPCAB) in patient with depressed left ventricular function is better than on-pump CABG (ONCAB) approach in in-hospital mortality and morbidities? Here we undertook a meta-analysis of the best evidence available on the comparison of primary and second clinical outcomes of the off-pump and on-pump CABG. DESIGN: Systematic literature reviewer and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of science and Cochrane Center Registry of Controlled Trials were searched the studies which comparing the use of the off-pump CABG(OPCAB) and on-pump CABG (ONCAB) for patients with LVD during January 1990.1 to January 2018. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: All observation studies and randomized controlled trials comparing on-pump and off-pump as main technique for multi-vessel coronary artery disease (defined as severe stenosis (>70%) in at least 2 major diseased coronary arteries) with left ventricular dysfunction(defined as ejection fraction (EF) 40% or less) were included. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Authors will screen and select the studies extract the following data, first author, year of publication, trial characters, study design, inclusion and exclusion criteria, graft type, clinical outcome, assess the risk of bias and heterogeneity. Study-specific estimates will pool through the modification of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the quality of study and while leave-one-out analysis will be used to detect the impact of individual studies on the robustness of outcomes. RESULTS: Among the 987 screened articles, a total of 16 studies (32,354 patients) were included. A significant relationship between patient risk profile and benefits from OPCAB was found in terms of the 30-day mortality (odds ratio [OR], 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73–0.97; P = 0.02), stroke (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.55–0.86; P = 0.00), myocardial infarction (MI) (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.53–0.96; P = 0.02), renal failure (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.55–0.93; P = 0.01), pulmonary complication (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.52–0.90; P = 0.01), infection (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.49–0.91; P = 0.00),postoperative transfusion (OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.08–0.84; P = 0.02) and reoperation for bleeding (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.41–0.75; P = 0.00). There was no significant difference in atrial fibrillation (AF) (OR, 0.96;95%; CI, 0.78–1.41; P = 0.56) and neurological dysfunction (OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.49–1.57; P = 0.65). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the on-pump CABG with LVD, using the off-pump CABG is a better choice for patients with lower mortality, stroke, MI, RF, pulmonary complication, infection, postoperative transfusion and reoperation for bleeding. Further randomized studies are warranted to corroborate these observational data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7216614 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72166142020-05-18 Short-term outcomes of on- vs off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with left ventricular dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis Guan, Zhiyuan Guan, Xiaoqing Gu, Kaiyun Lin, Xuanqi Lin, Jin Zhou, Wenjun Xu, Ming Wan, Fen Zhang, Zhe Song, Chunli J Cardiothorac Surg Review OBJECTIVES: Does the manipulation of the off-pump CABG (OPCAB) in patient with depressed left ventricular function is better than on-pump CABG (ONCAB) approach in in-hospital mortality and morbidities? Here we undertook a meta-analysis of the best evidence available on the comparison of primary and second clinical outcomes of the off-pump and on-pump CABG. DESIGN: Systematic literature reviewer and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of science and Cochrane Center Registry of Controlled Trials were searched the studies which comparing the use of the off-pump CABG(OPCAB) and on-pump CABG (ONCAB) for patients with LVD during January 1990.1 to January 2018. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: All observation studies and randomized controlled trials comparing on-pump and off-pump as main technique for multi-vessel coronary artery disease (defined as severe stenosis (>70%) in at least 2 major diseased coronary arteries) with left ventricular dysfunction(defined as ejection fraction (EF) 40% or less) were included. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Authors will screen and select the studies extract the following data, first author, year of publication, trial characters, study design, inclusion and exclusion criteria, graft type, clinical outcome, assess the risk of bias and heterogeneity. Study-specific estimates will pool through the modification of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the quality of study and while leave-one-out analysis will be used to detect the impact of individual studies on the robustness of outcomes. RESULTS: Among the 987 screened articles, a total of 16 studies (32,354 patients) were included. A significant relationship between patient risk profile and benefits from OPCAB was found in terms of the 30-day mortality (odds ratio [OR], 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73–0.97; P = 0.02), stroke (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.55–0.86; P = 0.00), myocardial infarction (MI) (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.53–0.96; P = 0.02), renal failure (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.55–0.93; P = 0.01), pulmonary complication (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.52–0.90; P = 0.01), infection (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.49–0.91; P = 0.00),postoperative transfusion (OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.08–0.84; P = 0.02) and reoperation for bleeding (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.41–0.75; P = 0.00). There was no significant difference in atrial fibrillation (AF) (OR, 0.96;95%; CI, 0.78–1.41; P = 0.56) and neurological dysfunction (OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.49–1.57; P = 0.65). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the on-pump CABG with LVD, using the off-pump CABG is a better choice for patients with lower mortality, stroke, MI, RF, pulmonary complication, infection, postoperative transfusion and reoperation for bleeding. Further randomized studies are warranted to corroborate these observational data. BioMed Central 2020-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7216614/ /pubmed/32393284 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-020-01115-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Guan, Zhiyuan Guan, Xiaoqing Gu, Kaiyun Lin, Xuanqi Lin, Jin Zhou, Wenjun Xu, Ming Wan, Fen Zhang, Zhe Song, Chunli Short-term outcomes of on- vs off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with left ventricular dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Short-term outcomes of on- vs off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with left ventricular dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Short-term outcomes of on- vs off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with left ventricular dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Short-term outcomes of on- vs off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with left ventricular dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Short-term outcomes of on- vs off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with left ventricular dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Short-term outcomes of on- vs off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with left ventricular dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | short-term outcomes of on- vs off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with left ventricular dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7216614/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32393284 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-020-01115-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guanzhiyuan shorttermoutcomesofonvsoffpumpcoronaryarterybypassgraftinginpatientswithleftventriculardysfunctionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT guanxiaoqing shorttermoutcomesofonvsoffpumpcoronaryarterybypassgraftinginpatientswithleftventriculardysfunctionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT gukaiyun shorttermoutcomesofonvsoffpumpcoronaryarterybypassgraftinginpatientswithleftventriculardysfunctionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT linxuanqi shorttermoutcomesofonvsoffpumpcoronaryarterybypassgraftinginpatientswithleftventriculardysfunctionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT linjin shorttermoutcomesofonvsoffpumpcoronaryarterybypassgraftinginpatientswithleftventriculardysfunctionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhouwenjun shorttermoutcomesofonvsoffpumpcoronaryarterybypassgraftinginpatientswithleftventriculardysfunctionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT xuming shorttermoutcomesofonvsoffpumpcoronaryarterybypassgraftinginpatientswithleftventriculardysfunctionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wanfen shorttermoutcomesofonvsoffpumpcoronaryarterybypassgraftinginpatientswithleftventriculardysfunctionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhangzhe shorttermoutcomesofonvsoffpumpcoronaryarterybypassgraftinginpatientswithleftventriculardysfunctionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT songchunli shorttermoutcomesofonvsoffpumpcoronaryarterybypassgraftinginpatientswithleftventriculardysfunctionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |